Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Sunday[...snip...]
hosted a convicted child sex predator on his podcast to defend Russian
president Vladimir Putin.
Kennedy's guest was Scott Ritter, a former United Nations weapons
Ritter, who during the Iraq war gained fame as an outspoken critic of the
Bush administration, is a controversial figure due to his criminal
history and his strong support for the Putin regime. In 2009, Ritter was
arrested after masturbating on a webcam in front of a police officer
posing as a 15-year-old girl. He served jail time for the incident and
was required to register as a sex offender.
Just in the last week or two, someone posted in FIDO POLITICS that the
GOP had been cozying up to Ritter. From what I saw in your post, it
has been Democrats and other third-party folks, not the GOP. Hmmm...
:)
Just in the last week or two, someone posted in FIDO POLITICS that the GOP had been cozying up to Ritter. From what I saw in your post, it has been Democrats and other third-party folks, not the GOP. Hmmm... :)
Don't tell me, it's a particularly annoying Canuckistan native.
The modern liberal is never happy, always finding nonsense to whine about.
Just in the last week or two, someone posted in FIDO POLITICS that the GOP had been cozying up to Ritter. From what I saw in your post, it
has been Democrats and other third-party folks, not the GOP. Hmmm...
:)
Don't tell me, it's a particularly annoying Canuckistan native.
Don't tell me, it's a particularly annoying Canuckistan native.
The modern liberal is never happy, always finding nonsense to whine about.
boutThe modern liberal is never happy, always finding nonsense to whine
Watch out if they can't get their morning Starbucks...
Actually it was not. This was a name I had not seen before until recently, was posted from somewhere south of here (TX or FL) and they never answer
responses.
Especially now that their fellow leftists are protesting Starbucks and managing to close some of them down!
The modern liberal is never happy, always finding nonsense to whine
about.
Especially now that their fellow leftists are protesting Starbucks and managing to close some of them down!
They're unionizing and corporate doesn't like it. Reap what you sow, losers.
Mike Powell wrote to SEAN DENNIS <=-
Correct, and they are picketing to the point where some locations have
had to close. Supposedly, the pickets are not just about unionizing
but also the rumor that corporate had some locations tone down their
pride festivities after the blowback that Bud Light and Target got. :D
I have no problems with those of various "orientations". I don't care what you do in your bedroom but don't shove it down my throat and for all that is good, leave the children alone.
Mike Powell wrote to SEAN DENNIS <=-
That is pretty much my stance. There has been a lot going on that
doesn't bother me, but there have also been several instances where
they appear to crave access to other's children and don't have a good explanation as to why that is important. So most assume the obvious.
I think it is sad that the folks who truely seem to have been gender disphoric and who truely seem happier post-transition are now under
threat by others who seem to have many other problems beyond gender disphoria.
That is pretty much my stance. There has been a lot going on that doesn't bother me, but there have also been several instances where
they appear to crave access to other's children and don't have a good explanation as to why that is important. So most assume the obvious.
I have several gay and lesbian friends who are dead-set against what is
going on, especially with children.
My guess is that they would argue with your gay and lesbian friends.
I have several gay and lesbian friends who are dead-set against what is going on, especially with children.
I know some people who have kids that are somewhere on the rainbow spectrum. For some reason, those parents are the ones that get set off
by every little thing that doesn't fit the narrative. They have regular meltdowns on facebook.
My guess is that they would argue with your gay and lesbian friends.
Mike
My Personal take on Budweiser is they took total advantage of a very vulnerable person for a profit and it backfired horribly. Why they did was abuse and got away with it, I am glad they paid a very big price for someth very stupid all in the name of Social Media and DEI ..
I totally see this view point and do agree both are completely guilty of this dumb stuff. Although either had very different motives. Dylan is obviously in serious need of professional medical help and Budweiser was taking advantage of a opportunity that clearly backfired. Yup, so I agree that point. Both win the dumbfu**ery of the year award.My Personal take on Budweiser is they took total advantage of a very vulnerable person for a profit and it backfired horribly. Why they did abuse and got away with it, I am glad they paid a very big price for s very stupid all in the name of Social Media and DEI ..
Except Budweiser is not totally guilty here as Dylan is not a very vulnerable person. That man has a clear agenda and compelling need to
both objectify and promote the worst stereotypical attributes of women
by way of social media... clearly taking advantage of all the fame and fortune along the way.
Dylan knows exactly what he's doing. He hates women by way of envy.
Nick
So, please understand the hard core noise that is supposed to be on the side
LGBTQ+ rights is not very popular withing the Gay community.
So if your not Gay, or a parent of a Gay, you have no idea what torment theyra
through just to be allowed to love who they wish. The Stare, the smack and
talk. Gay's did not choose to be gay just the same as a straight did nothoo
. It is who they are and who they choose to love. You will almost never seeedica
flaunting flamer". Any the ones that are the Social Media weirdo's need
help.
My Personal take on Budweiser is they took total advantage of a veryulnerabl
person for a profit and it backfired horribly. Why they did was abuse and got ay with it, I am glad they paid a very big price for something very stupidll
n the name of Social Media and DEI ..
I totally see this view point and do agree both are completely guilty of th dumb stuff. Although either had very different motives. Dylan is obviously serious need of professional medical help and Budweiser was taking advantag of a opportunity that clearly backfired. Yup, so I agree that point. Both the dumbfu**ery of the year award.
Thats always been my problem with the LGBTQ+ movement - When the T and the rest of the alphabet was added to LGB, thats when the "problems" started.
Mike Powell wrote to NICK ANDRE <=-
I wonder if they got stuck with them because some left-leaning
politicians lumped them all together.
Thats always been my problem with the LGBTQ+ movement - When the T and the>rest of the alphabet was added to LGB, thats when the "problems" started.
They are also teaching almost exclusively about LGBTQ++ to 5 and 6 year old to the point where heterosexual kids may start to feel like they are wrong to feel the way they do. I can understand at that age teaching that Some families may have 2 mommies or 2 daddies but there should be a line..
Is this where we are heading?..
I have wondered, especially as of late, why the original movement allowed those others to become part of it. I am sure there is overlap, but it sounds like many gay and lesbians really want no part of their crap, and that is not new. One of my friends in college (late 1980's) was bi.
Even back then, she knew that she wanted no part of some of the crazier stuff that was trying to work its way into the movement, and she was not alone.
around us. What is not fine? The school banned ALL books in the school library that had ANY white people in them. My niece, who has black
friends and is not the least bit racist, had brought in a few harmless books of her own that had white people in them and they were confiscated.
They are also teaching almost exclusively about LGBTQ++ to 5 and 6 year olds to the point where heterosexual kids may start to feel like they
are wrong to feel the way they do. I can understand at that age teaching that Some families may have 2 mommies or 2 daddies but there should be a line..
What is not fine? The school banned ALL books in the school> so that I can call and verify this? No offense but this seems bogus. This do
library that had ANY white people in them. My niece, who has black
friends and is not the least bit racist, had brought in a few harmless books of her own that had white people in them and they were confiscated.
Do you have a news article or source? Maybe you can share the name of the sch
They are also teaching almost exclusively about LGBTQ++ to 5 and 6 year olds to the point where heterosexual kids may start to feel like they>mis-characterization. Alas.
are wrong to feel the way they do. I can understand at that age teaching that Some families may have 2 mommies or 2 daddies..
Curious how many classrooms you've sat in and seen this? I also think this is
Nick Andre wrote to Rob Mccart <=-
Its interesting though - The influx of immigrants from third-world countries and specifically those who are Muslim - They are strongly opposed to all of this and will vote it out or at least do not enroll their kids in public school... a mistake I made years ago.
esc wrote to Mike Powell <=-
As someone that has numerous gay and lesbian friends, I
don't notice any of this at all. Granted both of our
experiences are subjective and all we can offer is
conjecture.
esc wrote to Rob Mccart <=-
Do you have a news article or source? Maybe you can share
the name of the school so that I can call and verify this?
No offense but this seems bogus. This does not happen. This
is FUD.
Curious how many classrooms you've sat in and seen this? I
also think this is a mis-characterization. Alas.
Okay, moderator mode on.
Man, this network really feels like a rightwing echochamber. Me asking for p
Well, tbh having people ask you for proof of your claims every time
you post, then go silent when you post the proof, gets old and boring
very fast. Specially if you post some similar claim later and they ask
you for the same proof again.
Well, tbh having people ask you for proof of your claims every time you post then go silent when you post the proof, gets old and boring very fast. Specially if you post some similar claim later and they ask you for the same proof again.
It is natural for people getting bored at it.
osWell, tbh having people ask you for proof of your claims every time you
amthen go silent when you post the proof, gets old and boring very fast. Specially if you post some similar claim later and they ask you for the
proof again.
It is natural for people getting bored at it.
Its a hilarious tactic by a certain individual in a certain other net who clearly has TDS despite living in Canada and that certain US president no longer in office.
Is the education system in BC that much worse than Ontario and other
parts of Canada? :)
Is the education system in BC that much worse than Ontario and other parts of Canada? :)
That same person ghosted Micronet because he doesn't have the balls to say he s leaving unlike former 300/56.
He truly is an Canadian Idiot (apologies to Weird Al).
Today he quoted himself and called the statement BS. :D Too bad most of his posts don't come with such disclaimers.
Mike Powell wrote to SEAN DENNIS <=-
Today he quoted himself and called the statement BS. :D Too bad most
of his posts don't come with such disclaimers.
Today he quoted himself and called the statement BS. :D Too bad most of his posts don't come with such disclaimers.
He also lives in a very desirable part of Canada. THAT takes the cake.
Today he quoted himself and called the statement BS. :D Too bad most of his posts don't come with such disclaimers.
He should be a politician. He's got the perfect personality for it.
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 257 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 34:57:08 |
Calls: | 1,786 |
Files: | 4,163 |
D/L today: |
4 files (3,726K bytes) |
Messages: | 394,793 |