She doesn't need a new computer...just a real OS.
well, not a new one. a different, better one that is cheap.
she probably won't like linux.
i tried that with my mom
Hello Jas Hud!
** On Thursday 07.04.22 - 00:15, Jas Hud wrote to Sean Dennis:
She doesn't need a new computer...just a real OS.
well, not a new one. a different, better one that is cheap.
she probably won't like linux.
i tried that with my mom
There are distros that attempt to look very much like Windows.
did you try one like that?
--
../|ug
well, not a new one. a different, better one that is cheap.
she probably won't like linux.
i tried that with my mom
There are distros that attempt to look very much like Windows.
did you try one like that?
There is nothing more lame than a Linux system trying to act as if it was another
system. If somebody wants System X he should use System X, not a something entirely
different that just attempts to look like it. You are not fooling anybody by pasing a
windowsy interface on an Unix-like OS.
My position nowadays when somebody asks me for help setting some OS
There are distros that attempt to look very much like
Windows. did you try one like that?
There is nothing more lame than a Linux system trying to
act as if it was another system.
If somebody wants System X he should use System X, not a
something entirely different that just attempts to look
like it. You are not fooling anybody by pasing a windowsy
interface on an Unix-like OS.
My position nowadays when somebody asks me for help setting
some OS installed for a general task is that Linux and BSD
is the only thing I support, and if they want to use
Windows because it is so easy, they can set it up
themselves since it is such an user friendly operating
system.
It is not that I am a Windows hater. I just value my time :-)
Arelor wrote to August Abolins <=-
My position nowadays when somebody asks me for help setting some OS installed for a general task is that Linux and BSD is the only thing I support, and if they want to use Windows because it is so easy, they
can set it up themselves since it is such an user friendly operating system.
It is not that I am a Windows hater. I just value my time :-)
Jas Hud wrote to Arelor <=-
yeah, these windows clone guis make me want to puke. i'd rather
just run the cli. why even use a poor copy.
If you're a paid consultant, Windows could be a goose laying golden
eggs.
You could just run twm with that 16-color background and relive 1995
all over again. You'd get multiple Xterms and no possibility of
mistaking it for a modern UI.
From Newsgroup: Micronet.MIN_CHAT
Jas Hud wrote to Arelor <=-
yeah, these windows clone guis make me want to puke. i'd rather
just run the cli. why even use a poor copy.
You could just run twm with that 16-color background and relive 1995 all over again. You'd get multiple Xterms and no possibility of mistaking it for a modern UI.
Sean Dennis wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
Even better, set up CDE. Living the glory days of UNIX desktop
goodness.
Kurt Weiske wrote to Sean Dennis <=-
I found a pre-packaged kit running Solaris x86 version 2.6 with CDE.
I'm reliving most of my early 2000s, which were spent setting up lots
of BSD or Linux boxes running Apache, Tomcat, and Java environments
with a Oracle database running on Sun hardware.
If I were going to run a retro UI, I think it'd be openbox.
If somebody wants System X he should use System X, not a
something entirely different that just attempts to look
like it. You are not fooling anybody by pasing a windowsy
interface on an Unix-like OS.
Most Windows users aren't even interested in the workings of a
System X. They just want familiarity of a UI that they have
been using.
Arelor wrote to August Abolins <=-
My position nowadays when somebody asks me for help setting some OS installed for a general task is that Linux and BSD is the only thing I support, and if they want to use Windows because it is so easy, they can set it up themselves since it is such an user friendly operating system.
It is not that I am a Windows hater. I just value my time :-)
If you're a paid consultant, Windows could be a goose laying golden eggs.
Sean Dennis wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
Even better, set up CDE. Living the glory days of UNIX desktop goodness.
I found a pre-packaged kit running Solaris x86 version 2.6 with CDE. I'm reliving most of my early 2000s, which were spent setting up lots of BSD or Linux boxes running Apache, Tomcat, and Java environments with a Oracle database running on Sun hardware.
If I were going to run a retro UI, I think it'd be openbox.
... Wait, this is a *scene*?
I use XFCE which is based on CDE as it has a similar feel to it with the way it works. Good enough for me.
-- Sean
Arelor wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
The only Windows machine I have to deal with acts as a controler for a radiodiagnostics unit. It works completelly off-line, no Internet
access. So far it works fine and has never given issue.
Agreed. Those people should be using WIndows because that is what they want to use :-)
From Newsgroup: Micronet.MIN_CHAT
Re: she probably won't like linux
By: Arelor to August Abolins on Wed Apr 13 2022 07:33 am
Agreed. Those people should be using WIndows because that is what they want to use :-)
As Windows evolved, the userbase devolved in lockstep. I feel that Windows users are either really good or exceptionally bad. Although I use Windows for work, my daily drivers are MacOS-based systems or Linux (RHEL, Ubuntu, etc.). My father, as an example, has been using Windows since 3.1. As Windows got more evolved, I swear he got more lost with it. After putting him in front of a Mac, it seems more familiar and easier to use for him.
Personally, just give me a *nix shell and I'm good.
computers are now just appliances.
Re: she probably won't like linux
By: Arelor to August Abolins on Wed Apr 13 2022 07:33 am
Agreed. Those people should be using WIndows because that is what they wa to use :-)
As Windows evolved, the userbase devolved in lockstep. I feel that Windows users are either really good or exceptionally bad. Although I use Windows f work, my daily drivers are MacOS-based systems or Linux (RHEL, Ubuntu, etc.) My father, as an example, has been using Windows since 3.1. As Windows got more evolved, I swear he got more lost with it. After putting him in front a Mac, it seems more familiar and easier to use for him.
Personally, just give me a *nix shell and I'm good.
Brian Klauss <-> Dream Master
Caught in a Dream | caughtinadream.com a Synchronet BBS
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 255 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 152:44:18 |
Calls: | 1,724 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 4,107 |
D/L today: |
10 files (9,986K bytes) |
Messages: | 392,941 |