Headline:
Florida voters reject recreational marijuana, ending expensive ballot measure
Mas Headline:
Amendment 4 is rejected by Florida voters, keeping state's 6-week
abortion ban in place, CBS News projects
So, I tried... I voted that abortion should be in the Florida constitution... My votes didn't help...
Aaron Thomas wrote to IB Joe <=-
I like that the voters made that decision. Smoking weed is unhealthy.
This decision helps protect children from developing the harmful habit, and it helps protect adults too.
This should serve as a realty-check for those people who don't
understand that abortion is now regulated at state level. Now we just
have to tell them "it's regulated at state level just look at what happened in Florida."
This should serve as a realty-check for those people who don't
understand that abortion is now regulated at state level. Now we just
have to tell them "it's regulated at state level just look at what happened in Florida."
This should serve as a realty-check for those people who don't understand that abortion is now regulated at state level. Now we just have to tell them "it's regulated at state level just look at what happened in Florida."
Most people know that. The ones making noise live in states where it is not legal. Harris campaigned on making it legal at the national level, which could be done provided that her party had also won both houses, and that they were also capable of crafting (and passing!) a bill that passed Constitutional muster.
Mike Powell wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
This should serve as a realty-check for those people who don't
understand that abortion is now regulated at state level. Now we just
have to tell them "it's regulated at state level just look at what happened in Florida."
Most people know that. The ones making noise live in states where it
is not legal. Harris campaigned on making it legal at the national
level, which could be done provided that her party had also won both houses, and that they were also capable of crafting (and passing!) a
bill that passed Constitutional muster.
I like that the voters made that decision. Smoking weed is unhealthy.
This decision helps protect children from developing the harmful habit, and it helps protect adults too.
This should serve as a realty-check for those people who don't
understand that abortion is now regulated at state level. Now we just
have to tell them "it's regulated at state level just look at what happened in Florida."
Yep - I'm in Tennessee and the ones on the left here like to say we
have some of the most draconian abortion laws in the country. What
they do NOT say is that the majority of the population WANT
restrictions.
Ya... It's funny. I didn't really understand what I was voting for there... I heard the Governor come out and talk on these 2 amendments... The language is important.... Having Abortion enshrined as a "RIGHT"
will allow the left to push the f*&k out of this until they get legal abortions in the 8th, 9th and 10th months. They also wanted to remove certified doctor from the current verbiage to "Health Care Professional" so that anyone can perform and abortion...
Alan Ianson wrote to jimmylogan <=-
Yep - I'm in Tennessee and the ones on the left here like to say we
have some of the most draconian abortion laws in the country. What
they do NOT say is that the majority of the population WANT
restrictions.
That is no true. About 70% of Americans want abortion rights. No body wanted Roe v. Wade overturned.
I doubt if a mojority of the population in your area want it either.
I doubt if a mojority of the population in your area want it either.
No way to know since everyone doesn't vote, but only in small pockets (Memphis and Nashville) do the majority send those that are the most
vocal. The rest of the state sends those that are defending family
and life.
jimmylogan wrote to Mike Powell <=-
Yep - I'm in Tennessee and the ones on the left here like to say we
have some of the most draconian abortion laws in the country. What
they do NOT say is that the majority of the population WANT
restrictions.
IB Joe wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
So, women stop having sex with sperm producing people and men... stop getting people pregnant... Bitches be crazy.
Alan Ianson wrote to jimmylogan <=-
I doubt if a mojority of the population in your area want it either.
No way to know since everyone doesn't vote, but only in small pockets (Memphis and Nashville) do the majority send those that are the most
vocal. The rest of the state sends those that are defending family
and life.
I am not talking about elections. It is a fact, ~70% of people in the
US want women to have health care when they need it, and the right to chose to have a baby or not.
Just because a women chooses today not to have a baby she may choose to
do that at another time.
Ron L. wrote to jimmylogan <=-
jimmylogan wrote to Mike Powell <=-
Yep - I'm in Tennessee and the ones on the left here like to say we
have some of the most draconian abortion laws in the country. What
they do NOT say is that the majority of the population WANT
restrictions.
That's the Elitist mentality that the majority of us voted against.
We have too many people who think that they can run your life better
than you.
We live in a democratic republic - or another way to say it a representative republic.
You can quote a statistic but laws don't change because of that.
If that many people wanted abortion on demand then I believe the lawmakers would have no choice but to make it happen.
The lawmakers in MY state have not made it happen because according to
them they are representing their constiguents. This does NOT translate
to 70% want abortion on demand.
That is no true. About 70% of Americans want abortion rights. No body wanted Roe v. Wade overturned.
I doubt if a mojority of the population in your area want it either.
That is no true. About 70% of Americans want abortion rights. No body wanted Roe v. Wade overturned.
I doubt if a mojority of the population in your area want it either.
No way to know since everyone doesn't vote, but only in small pockets (Memphis and Nashville) do the majority send those that are the most
vocal. The rest of the state sends those that are defending family
and life.
Yea, if there's no law making abortion illegal, then there's no need for
a law "to make it legal." In New York they tricked us with a referendum that "guarantees equal rights for all people." We already had "equal rights for all people," but this trick now gives equal rights to "all people including illegal immigrants." I didn't fall for it but it passed.
I am not talking about elections. It is a fact, ~70% of people in the US want women to have health care when they need it, and the right to chose to have a baby or not.
Just because a women chooses today not to have a baby she may choose to
do that at another time.
Eric S. Raymond had a good one on X on that topic:
I have a message for 4B women from the sane men of America. We fully support your sex strike! And we are especially enthusiastic about the practice you're developing of shaving your heads to signal that you're
not sexually available to men.
This solves a real problem for us. We know two things: (1) sticking your dick in crazy is a really bad idea, and (2) more than 40% of liberal-identifying women of marriageable age have diagnosed mental illnesses.
By adopting abstinence and identifying yourselves in a visible way, you are going a long way towards solving our problem of identifying the crazies so we can avoid even wanting to get entangled with them.
This is excellent. On behalf of the men of America, I thank you, and I hope you will soon persuade all women who feel the way you do to shave their heads. In fact, we would love it if your recognition signal were even less ambiguous. Maybe tattooing a big NO on your foreheads?
Peace, out.
I am not talking about elections. It is a fact, ~70% of people in the US
want women to have health care when they need it, and the right to chose
to have a baby or not.
Just because a women chooses today not to have a baby she may choose to
do that at another time.
What you just said is not true...
the number of 70% comes when people are asked if women can have an abortion in the first trimester... That number drops significantly for late term abortion.
If the Democrats would agree to first-term limits and non-elective late-term they'd have the votes today to codify the abortion laws... but they want unrestricted access and have women chose to have an elective abortion on the day of delivery.
BTW, 60% of the late-term abortions performed were not for health reasons... to save the mother's live... but because she wanted to take a Mulligan.
rights for all people," but this trick now gives equal rights to "all people including illegal immigrants." I didn't fall for it but it pas
They are smart... Look to find some tricky way to pass their agenda
I'm concerned that states like New York will try to shield illegal immigrants from deportation, but Trump said that he will defund
sanctuary cities, so at least I will win one way or the other.
Alan Ianson wrote to jimmylogan <=-
We live in a democratic republic - or another way to say it a representative republic.
Yes, it is. What it is not is a theocracy.
You can quote a statistic but laws don't change because of that.
If that many people wanted abortion on demand then I believe the lawmakers would have no choice but to make it happen.
It's not about abortion on demand. It is about a womans right to
privacy and health care.
Wonen had these rights before the supreme court overturned Roe v Wade.
The lawmakers in MY state have not made it happen because according to
them they are representing their constiguents. This does NOT translate
to 70% want abortion on demand.
I am not sure what the percentage is in your area but I'd bet a dollar
it is similar to that.
Mike Powell wrote to ALAN IANSON <=-
That is no true. About 70% of Americans want abortion rights. No body wanted Roe v. Wade overturned.
I doubt if a mojority of the population in your area want it either.
He meant Tennesseeans. That said:
https://news.vanderbilt.edu/2024/05/22/vanderbilt-poll-majority-of-tenne ssee-
voters-now-pro-choice-gender-gap-developing-on-key-issues/
My guess would be that the result of restrictions that are *too* harsh
has lead residents to rethink how they feel about the issue.
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
What you just said is not true... the number of 70% comes when people
are asked if women can have an abortion in the first trimester... That number drops significantly for late term abortion.
If the Democrats would agree to first-term limits and non-elective late-term they'd have the votes today to codify the abortion laws...
but they want unrestricted access and have women chose to have an
elective abortion on the day of delivery.
BTW, 60% of the late-term abortions performed were not for health reasons... to save the mother's live... but because she wanted to take
a Mulligan.
They also asked vague questions like "do you think we need more common sense gun laws." Who wouldn't agree to 'common sense' - but they wouldn't let me question constitutionality.
BTW, 60% of the late-term abortions performed were not for health reasons... t
save the mother's live... but because she wanted to take a Mulligan.
rights for all people," but this trick now gives equal rights to "all >IJ> AT> people including illegal immigrants." I didn't fall for it but it pas
They are smart... Look to find some tricky way to pass their agenda
I'm concerned that states like New York will try to shield illegal immigrants from deportation, but Trump said that he will defund sanctuary cities, so at least I will win one way or the other.
And what is the result of this 'health care?' Abortion on demand.
BTW, 60% of the late-term abortions performed were not for health reasons... to save the mother's live... but because she wanted to take
a Mulligan.
That's also why I balk at the talk of 'mental health.' Just because you
are depressed that you can't go to parties doesn't mean you should be
able to murder someone else.
Yes, it is. What it is not is a theocracy.
Gonna pull one of your moves.
When did I say it was? LOL
And what is the result of this 'health care?' Abortion on demand.
I am not sure what the percentage is in your area but I'd bet a dollar
it is similar to that.
Then even though it would be a sad day for the unborn, they need to get
out and vote.
But there will very likely be no mass deportations.
Aaron Thomas wrote to IB Joe <=-
I'm concerned that states like New York will try to shield illegal immigrants from deportation, but Trump said that he will defund
sanctuary cities, so at least I will win one way or the other.
Glad you brought that up... Though I'm against ALL of it, I would concede to stopping MOST of it. I think ALL life is precious and all made in the image of God, but I won't sacrifice all when I can save MOST.
But that's a private matter between her and the doctor...
Not my words...
That's also why I balk at the talk of 'mental health.' Just because you are depressed that you can't go to parties doesn't mean you should be
able to murder someone else.
Mike Powell wrote to JIMMYLOGAN <=-
They also asked vague questions like "do you think we need more common sense gun laws." Who wouldn't agree to 'common sense' - but they wouldn't let me question constitutionality.
The problem is that you cannot really legislate common sense.
Alan Ianson wrote to jimmylogan <=-
I am not sure what the percentage is in your area but I'd bet a dollar
it is similar to that.
Then even though it would be a sad day for the unborn, they need to get
out and vote.
What about the women affected? Don't they have any say?
What about the women affected? Don't they have any say?
I'm saying that if the majority want abortion on demand, they need to
get out and vote for it. Since the majority of voters are sending conservatives to my state legislation, the lawmakers are supporting
defendig the unborn.
What does that have to do with the woman? They have votes as well.
Not sure where else you're going with that...
I was watching (by accident, nothing else was on) the Cuomo show
Wednesday night on NewsNation. He had Bill O'Reilly in as a guest. I hate to disappoint anyone expecting Trump to keep his "mass deporations" promise because, as Bill pointed out, once they are on US soil they have
a right to due-process, and due-process for that many illegals is going
to take a while.
Bill pointed out that Trump could still do some things, like suspending new asylum claims until the current mess is accounted for, and also getting with the President of Mexico to have Mexican troops put back on their Southern and Northern borders to help us stem the flow.
But there will very likely be no mass deportations.
I'm concerned that states like New York will try to shield illegal immigrants from deportation, but Trump said that he will defund sanctuary cities, so at least I will win one way or the other.
Take away their free housing, food, money, etc. and most will deport themselves.
In 2021, second and third trimester abortions only accounted for 7% of total abortions in the 41 states (plus New York City) that report their data to the CDC. Only *1%* were in the third trimester.
So, depending on what you mean by "late-term," 60% of 7%, or 1%, is not that many at all.
Take away their free housing, food, money, etc. and most will deport themselves.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
My prediction has somewhat come true already: the hotels might not be closed yet, but NYC mayor Adams announced that he's no longer giving
the migrants the $300 per week prepaid debit cards. (They will have to rape and pillage for their money from here on out.)
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
There is a European country, the name escapes me, that's giving
migrants 35K and a plane ticket home to leave...
jimmylogan wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
What does that have to do with the woman? They have votes as well.
Not sure where else you're going with that...
But there will very likely be no mass deportations.
Mass deportation was an election promise. He will likely make good that promise
in some way.
They also asked vague questions like "do you think we need more common sense >> gun laws." Who wouldn't agree to 'common sense' - but they wouldn't let me >> question constitutionality.
The problem is that you cannot really legislate common sense.
My son says "Common Sense is a superpower!"
Bill pointed out that Trump could still do some things, like suspending new asylum claims until the current mess is accounted for, and also getting with the President of Mexico to have Mexican troops put back on their Southern and Northern borders to help us stem the flow.
But there will very likely be no mass deportations.
I get what you're saying, and for all I know that might be the law. But this isn't something that Trump can quietly walk away from. There are a lot of people counting on him to do something about this. Maybe he can at least incarcerate them, or something.
In 2021, second and third trimester abortions only accounted for 7% of total abortions in the 41 states (plus New York City) that report their data to the CDC. Only *1%* were in the third trimester.
So, depending on what you mean by "late-term," 60% of 7%, or 1%, is not that many at all.
As a compromise in my thinking I said... Abortions in the first trimester... The baby during that time sort of resembles a clump of tissue. Doesn't matter
if you were raped... or you use abortion as a form of birth control. 1st semester.
Abortions after that point can't be elective... Don't get your calculator out and try to minimize the affect... Ooooooohhhh it's only a few 1000 or 10s of thousands... Its smaller than some rounding errors in the Federal budget ... Nancy made more on stock trades in 2024 so far than babies aborted late term.
If their is a woman who wants to abort the baby late-term... She should have a
Cesarean and put the baby up for adoption.
My prediction has somewhat come true already: the hotels might not be closed yet, but NYC mayor Adams announced that he's no longer giving the migrants the $300 per week prepaid debit cards. (They will have t rape and pillage for their money from here on out.)
Oh, ya. Several people opined that simply not giving the illegals free stuff will cause them to deport themselves.
One thing O'Reilly did not mention is how Trump's administration could influence the outcome of said trials, but they do have the right to a
fair trial. I would also point out that I *think* they also share the right of a speedy trial, which they currently are *not* getting.
So unless Trump decides to break the law, there will be no mass deporations. If he decides to break the law, that would set a bad precident as the suspending of due process for these persons could open the door for similar things being done to citizens.
Mike Powell wrote to JIMMYLOGAN <=-
They also asked vague questions like "do you think we need more common sense gun laws." Who wouldn't agree to 'common sense' - but they wouldn't let me question constitutionality.
The problem is that you cannot really legislate common sense.
Alan Ianson wrote to jimmylogan <=-
I am not sure what the percentage is in your area but I'd bet a dollar
it is similar to that.
Then even though it would be a sad day for the unborn, they need to get
out and vote.
What about the women affected? Don't they have any say?
IB Joe wrote to jimmylogan <=-
On 08 Nov 2024, jimmylogan said the following...
Glad you brought that up... Though I'm against ALL of it, I would concede to stopping MOST of it. I think ALL life is precious and all made in the image of God, but I won't sacrifice all when I can save MOST.
I'm pro-life but I feel that we've lost our culture... Young teen girls twerking for money in their fans only page.... How do you put the toothpaste back into the tube...
We need to get a handle on this... The dems love a wedge issue... But
this is getting stupid.
For me personally if they band it tomorrow I'm Okay with it. I just
want them to shut up about being able to kill there babies... There
must be a point somewhere that'll make them happy.
Sort of like a company giving its useless workers a severance package if they choose to leave. Well, sometimes that IS the most cost effective
way of handling things.
But it sounds like something ripe for fraud. Illegal1 calls his family
to come, helps them in, they all get 35K for a few days work.
I would hope that they keep track of the ones who took the payout so
they don't keep coming back. Oh, wait, this is an European country.
They aren't that smart.
Mike Powell wrote to ALAN IANSON <=-
Legally he really cannot in the literal sense. His avenues for keeping that promise in spirit were what I mentioned in my previous message on this thread.
What about the women affected? Don't they have any say?
I'm saying that if the majority want abortion on demand, they need to
get out and vote for it.
Since the majority of voters are sending conservatives to my state legislation, the lawmakers are supporting defendig the unborn.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
That's being a little too optimistic. He (Adams) claims that they're leaving NYC and going to places like upstate NY and/or back to Texas.
Many of these migrants are coming from countries that don't even have anything worth stealing. But here in the states, this is a thief's
dream come true.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
As long as it speeds up the process. And the government just prints
money anyway, it won't cost us a thing.
One thing O'Reilly did not mention is how Trump's administration could influence the outcome of said trials, but they do have the right to a fair trial. I would also point out that I *think* they also share the right of a speedy trial, which they currently are *not* getting.
So unless Trump decides to break the law, there will be no mass deporations. If he decides to break the law, that would set a bad precident as the suspending of due process for these persons could open the door for similar things being done to citizens.
Trump has mentioned something about hiring more Administrative Law Judges. Maybe that's the way to go. Build the wall, hire more judges, and don't let these people hang around until 2030.
aveLegally he really cannot in the literal sense. His avenues for keeping that promise in spirit were what I mentioned in my previous message on this thread.
Donald trump has never been one to let the law, the constitution or common sense get in his way.
This was a campaign promise that he made to his MAGA follwers and he will
to keep it or ...
So unless Trump decides to break the law, there will be no mass deporations. If he decides to break the law, that would set a bad precident as the suspending of due process for these persons could the door for similar things being done to citizens.
Trump has mentioned something about hiring more Administrative Law Judge Maybe that's the way to go. Build the wall, hire more judges, and don't these people hang around until 2030.
That was sort of where I was going with "right of a speedy trial." They currently are not getting that. If, for example, we as citizens were to break the law and had to wait 5 or more years to find out our fates, that would be considered a violation of our rights.
Alan Ianson wrote to jimmylogan <=-
What about the women affected? Don't they have any say?
I'm saying that if the majority want abortion on demand, they need to
get out and vote for it.
There was just a vote for president, but there was no vote for
abortion. Why should/would there be?
Since the majority of voters are sending conservatives to my state legislation, the lawmakers are supporting defendig the unborn.
Actually, since Donald Trump is saying the states are now voting on it maybe there should be a vote. Was there a vote for it in Tennessee.
Why does your beliefs on the matter mean more than the womans?
Ron L. wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
That works until they leave Left-run areas. Rednecks handle thiefs differently.
Sort of like a company giving its useless workers a severance package if they choose to leave. Well, sometimes that IS the most cost effective
way of handling things.
But it sounds like something ripe for fraud. Illegal1 calls his family
to come, helps them in, they all get 35K for a few days work.
I would hope that they keep track of the ones who took the payout so
they don't keep coming back. Oh, wait, this is an European country.
They aren't that smart.
Most abortions (93%) happened in the first trimester.
Throwing a "60% of late term" number out, making it sound like a big number, is inaccurate. It would come out to 4 out of every 100 total abortions, or 4%. If "late term" is third trimester only, it would come out to 1 out of every 200, or 0.5%.
That's the crux of the matter. All of this talk about 'freedom' is
freedom to murder. SMH
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
As long as it speeds up the process. And the government just prints money anyway, it won't cost us a thing.
But it does cost us plenty.
Printing money = Inflation = Tax on everyone's money, even what we have sitting in retirement funds, savings, etc.
Mike Powell wrote to ALAN IANSON <=-
This was a campaign promise that he made to his MAGA follwers and he will have to keep it or ...
... he will risk upsetting them. In this case, I believe the
followers are not going to get exactly what they expected. ;)
jimmylogan wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
There was just a vote for president, but there was no vote for
abortion. Why should/would there be?
Did you read my comments on representative republic? People vote for
and against issues every time they elect a senetor or representative,
or even a school board member or county commissioner.
Since the majority of voters are sending conservatives to my state legislation, the lawmakers are supporting defendig the unborn.
Actually, since Donald Trump is saying the states are now voting on it maybe there should be a vote. Was there a vote for it in Tennessee.
Not on the ballet this year, becasue - again - the majority are conservative because that is what is being sent to the legislature
each year.
Why does your beliefs on the matter mean more than the womans?
It doesn't, but it should matter equally. The unborn hasn't reached
a voting age yet, just like a toddler or teen hasn't. I'm simply expressing my desire that they not be sacrificed.
jimmylogan wrote to Dr. What <=-
This is a good point! Tennessee is a 'gun toting' state. I won't shoot
you in the back for stealing my television, but I will defend myself
and others if you threaten by coming into my house while I am home.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Printing money = Inflation = Tax on everyone's money, even what we have sitting in retirement funds, savings, etc.
Hello @RonL... sarcasm
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
I've heard of the "right to a speedy trial" before, but I don't know if that pertains only to people accused of crimes, or to all people
awaiting trial.
I've heard of the "right to a speedy trial" before, but I don't know that pertains only to people accused of crimes, or to all people awaiting trial.
Under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, criminal defendants have the right to a speedy trial. This right is designed to protect three interests of the accused:
Hello @RonL... sarcasm
That's why we usually mark is **sarcasm**. Verbal cues don't work well via messages.
Most abortions (93%) happened in the first trimester.
Throwing a "60% of late term" number out, making it sound like a big number, is inaccurate. It would come out to 4 out of every 100 total abortions, or 4%. If "late term" is third trimester only, it would come out to 1 out of every 200, or 0.5%.
There's nothing you can do to convince me... It's only 100,000 babies terminated in the later months.
Lets make it law... 1st trimester and any point after that... Cannot be elective and has to be a valid reason to terminate it... and the baby is not viable.
Every time someone brings this up the Democrats go nuts.
This was a campaign promise that he made to his MAGA follwers and he will have to keep it or ...
... he will risk upsetting them. In this case, I believe the
followers are not going to get exactly what they expected. ;)
He promised bloody deportations. I can only hope that doesn't happen.
Why does your beliefs on the matter mean more than the womans?
It doesn't, but it should matter equally. The unborn hasn't reached
a voting age yet, just like a toddler or teen hasn't. I'm simply
expressing my desire that they not be sacrificed.
If I use your percentage - 60% elective after the first trimester - and the percentage of abortions that are not first trimester - 7% - there
has been no year where that would account for 100,000 babies. It would
be less than 4,000 that are elective after the first trimester.
How many of those thousands of kids can I put you down for adopting?
Mike Powell wrote to ALAN IANSON <=-
He promised bloody deportations. I can only hope that doesn't happen.
He can deport them, but not without a trial for each of them first.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
That answers it. The right to a speedy trial is for criminal
defendants. So the guarantee is not extended to migrants seeking
asylum.
But we need to speed those up. I vaguely remember Trump saying at one
of his campaigns that he intends to hire more administrative law judges for this purpose.
Since 1990 abortions performed have decreased by ~ 2/3rds... Shocking, to me anyway. Giving expectant mothers the choice and assistance they seem to go with having the baby.
I say give women the support they need and if they choose to have an abortion have it early on...
If you guys on the left keep pushing unfeathered abortion any time... youigh
be sorry someday as someone might push for the rights of the unborn.
I believe no one should kill a viable and healthy unborn baby... Just hoursr
days before it could be born naturally.
There are people waiting to adopt... They'll be sent out to nice homes. Iur
61 tomorrow. My oldest is ~40 and I have a 14 year old in the house... Shes
1 year younger than my youngest granddaughter and I have a pissed off Lesbian Marxist living in the basement... to boot... I'm shocked she hasn't come up from her room claiming she's joined the 4B movement.
He promised bloody deportations. I can only hope that doesn't happen.
He can deport them, but not without a trial for each of them first.
I don't think Donald's bloody deportation promise included trials.
hUnder the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, criminal defendants have the right to a speedy trial. This right is designed to protect three interests of the accused:
That answers it. The right to a speedy trial is for criminal defendants. So
guarantee is not extended to migrants seeking asylum.
But we need to speed those up. I vaguely remember Trump saying at one of his campaigns that he intends to hire more administrative law judges for this purpose.
This was a campaign promise that he made to his MAGA follwers and he wil
have to keep it or ...
... he will risk upsetting them. In this case, I believe the followers are not going to get exactly what they expected. ;)
He promised bloody deportations. I can only hope that doesn't happen.Why would deportations have to be bloody, and why did you characterize this as bloody? To indicate to us all that you disagree, but why your located in Canada. Why do you care? Just want to be that fly in our ointment, eh?
Gregory Deyss wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
Why would deportations have to be bloody, and why did you characterize this as bloody?
To indicate to us all that you disagree, but why your
located in Canada. Why do you care? Just want to be that fly in our ointment, eh?
Haven't you been paying attention to the details w/ who is going first?
But we need to speed those up. I vaguely remember Trump saying at one of his campaigns that he intends to hire more administrative law judg for this purpose.
The problem is that it takes time to vet these people to see that they
are who they say they are. That's why the "Stay in Mexico" policy was
so successful: The ones truely seeking asylum would go for it, while
thes ones who were just looking for a quick way in didn't.
That answers it. The right to a speedy trial is for criminal defendants.h
guarantee is not extended to migrants seeking asylum.
To be certain, it should apply to those who came in illegally because
they did break the law and their defense is that they are eligible for asylum.
He promised bloody deportations. I can only hope that doesn't happen.Why would deportations have to be bloody, and why did you characterize this as
bloody? To indicate to us all that you disagree, but why your located in Canada. Why do you care? Just want to be that fly in our ointment, eh?
I would assume as a Lesbian she already has most, or all, of those 4Bs covered. :D
You actually bring up an interesting point (between this message and the last one). The women I have noticed who seem to want the fewest restrictions put on abortion are usually in groups (older, lesbian) who are not very likely to be getting pregnant.
Maybe I am wrong there but that is my observation.
He promised bloody deportations. I can only hope that doesn't happen.
Why would deportations have to be bloody,
Gregory Deyss wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
He promised bloody deportations. I can only hope that doesn't happen.
Why would deportations have to be bloody, and why did you characterize this as bloody?
To indicate to us all that you disagree, but why your located in
Canada. Why do you care? Just want to be that fly in our ointment,
eh?
Haven't you been paying attention to the details w/ who is going first? Those illegals who have committed crimes. They have been allowed to overstay as it is.
Violation of U.S. Sovereignty will have meaning again, instead of it
being ignored as was done w/ the Biden Administration.
The wide-eyed clown faced Alejandro Mayorkas will be gone (what a
arrogant SOB he was too..) telling the American people that the border
is secure, when it was the farthest thing from the truth, how could it
be secure w/ 20+ million people here who have illegally crossed the southern border of the United States of America?
Trump apparently did indicate that deportations would be a "bloodyThat's interesting take but you know as well as I do that libs take things out of context all the time. Media Matters does such as a business, they stoke the fire all the time, but this time if different.
story" in his second term. I am not able to link to the article because it is behind a ad/paywall and I cannot verify the context of the statement.
No but they are "screwed" either way - they will be outta here.He promised bloody deportations. I can only hope that doesn't happen.
Why would deportations have to be bloody,
Does fucking deportations involve coitus?
I disagree with the concept of mass deportations. It is a simple as that.
They are eating the dogs, they are eating the cats, they are eating the pets of the people who live there. These are the words of Donald Trump
on the debate stage. It was all lies.
The GOP today has control of the white house, the senate and the house.houl
They can collectively make laws around immigration and execute those laws as they should. I hope they will do that and stop saying that the president
do that/something.
They are eating the dogs, they are eating the cats, they are eating the pets of the people who live there. These are the words of Donald Trump on the debate stage. It was all lies.
You don't know what they've been eating, unless you've been dissecting them and/or analyzing their poop.
Have you been doing that?
Aside from a viral FB post, which the original poster has since
apologized for, there has been no evidence of Haitian migrants eating
pets in Springfield, Ohio.
The lady caught on video after supposedly eating someone's pet was in Canton, was an *American* citizen, and was known to police due to her history of mental issues.
Does fucking deportations involve coitus?
He promised bloody deportations. I can only hope that doesn't happen.
Why would deportations have to be bloody, and why did you characteriz this as bloody?
I didn't make this characterization, Donald Trump did. Many times at his rallies.
That solves one mystery, but there have been other reports of migrants eating livestock. Everybody has to eat something. I know desperate people who eat squirrels and bear meat every day.
If we have Americans who are allowed to work eating squirrels and bear meat every day, what will migrants without visas eat?
I didn't make this characterization, Donald Trump did. Many times at his rallies.
He said mass deportation, not bloody... Well, bloody if some the people are menstruating.
Trump supposedly did say the deportations would be a "bloody story" but I will also note that any references I have found to this have all been
behind ad or pay walls and I cannot access the context of the quote.
Does fucking deportations involve coitus?
Getting into the US might...
If we have Americans who are allowed to work eating squirrels and bear m every day, what will migrants without visas eat?
Squirrel is supposedly good eating. I had a bear steak once and thought it was really tough to chew.
Squirrel is supposedly good eating. I had a bear steak once and thought it was really tough to chew.
My nephew eats this awful stuff because he likes to save money. He was munchin
on a bag of bear meat in my car and it made my car stink for a couple days.
He tried to get me to eat some but I refused.
Trump supposedly did say the deportations would be a "bloody story" but I will also note that any references I have found to this have all been behind ad or pay walls and I cannot access the context of the quote.
Yea. Good point!
It's entering the USA illegally that involves coitus!
It's entering the USA illegally that involves coitus!
The Democrats are all in your face about sex... But they are blind to
the fact that kids and women are sold into sex slavery during this process...
IB Joe wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
The Democrats are all in your face about sex... But they are blind to
the fact that kids and women are sold into sex slavery during this process...
There are over 1,000,000 illegals already adjudicated with deportation papers...
There are MS13 and other gang members and known criminals in the country...
There are people raping and murdering US citizens, as well as other crimes...
There are people eating the cats and dogs in Springfield OH.
When they say "My body, my choice," they're really talking about other peoples' bodies.
Not "blind". "Willfully blind". They choose to ignore the sex
trafficing (mostly because their leaders participate in it).
For anyone whose case has not already been adjudicated, they will need to have a hearing/trial before they can be deported. I have *no* problems with them being deported upon their case being adjudicated. I also have *no* problems with suspending asylum claims until the current mess is worked out.
BTW, I just helped someone with the paperwork to get her Green Card. She got it a week or so ago.
Fill out the paperwork and be legal... or get tossed!!!
Not "blind". "Willfully blind". They choose to ignore the sex trafficing (mostly because their leaders participate in it).
That's true... Wait until P. Diddy trial starts and names are released... Epstein's client list...
We need Matt as AG!!!
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
That's true... Wait until P. Diddy trial starts and names are
released... Epstein's client list...
We need Matt as AG!!!
Good. I have friends that have gone about it the legal way. They get hassled when they visit home and them come back. Not sure why we hassle the legal ones so much while seeming to coddle the ones that are not.
I wouldn't count on Matt releasing the Epstein list. He might just be on it.
I see that we already made Ellen flee the country.
We need Matt as AG!!!
Very much so. He'll be a very busy person for the next 4 years.
When I go to Canada I use my Canadian passport and the same when I go to The US... They get my US passport.
I still get static from time to time... It's like the border guard has nothing better to do.
They don't. Most of our border officers are recent immigrants.
| Sysop: | deepend |
|---|---|
| Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
| Users: | 253 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 14:55:45 |
| Calls: | 1,646 |
| Files: | 3,994 |
| Messages: | 387,903 |