• Hillary's nomination

    From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Wed Sep 25 09:52:00 2024
    I get it. The Democrat party can't hold a primary because that equate >RL> AT> to asking their followers questions (not the sexy kind of questions >RL> AT> either.)

    Of course. Remember what they did to Bernie back in 2015. He was going >RL> to get the nomination, but the "super delegates", selected Hillary.

    Bernie probably isn't as much of a team player as Kamala is. Besides, it's probably a good thing that the elite chose not to let the leftists vote in a primary, because they like having their mind made up for them. It saved them time and gas money.

    During the election that Ron mentions, Hillary told the DNC that she'd not
    run unless she had control over the DNC pursestrings. They agreed and,
    IMHO, that was the point where she really became their presumptive nominee
    (and everyone else who was running for nomination became SOL).


    * SLMR 2.1a * What is mind? No matter! What is matter? Never mind!
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Wed Sep 25 15:20:44 2024
    During the election that Ron mentions, Hillary told the DNC that she'd
    not run unless she had control over the DNC pursestrings. They agreed and, IMHO, that was the point where she really became their presumptive nominee (and everyone else who was running for nomination became SOL).

    That's a good example of ignorant elitism. Hillary was a big waste of money for them, and I sense that Kamala might be the same thing.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)