@MSGID: <66CCB963.27627.politicf@capcity2.synchro.net>
I posted a link the other day on someone claiming that the "Would be" Trump assassin was not a loan shooter. He asked compelling questions... Of which I'm sure none of the 3 letter agencies will answer.

There were vets present at the rally. There were 3 interviewed right after th
shooting, they claimed that the shooting came from the tower, not the roof.

Alan, vets have been shot at before and they know when the shots usually are coming from.

There was someone who analyzed the auditory sounds of the shots. There were 8
shots in total, 5 shots sounded the same and had an echo attached to them wher
as 3 sounded louder and no echo associated with them. This could indicate a larger caliber, the louder sound, and the lack of echo could indicate a different position.

I believe that this is mostly conspiracy.

My reasoning is as follows:

1) when the agent who was aiming at the roof shot at the person on the
roof, the shooting stopped.

2) if there were multiple shooters, why didn't any of the others continue shooting until they were either (a) also shot, or (b) successful at hitting/killing Trump?

3) in statements that Trump has himself made, I have never heard him claim
that he or any of his staff believe there was more than one shooter. He instead claimed that the Secret Service sniper got the shooter and helped
save the day.

There could eventually be some concrete evidence that proves otherwise but, until then, I believe there was only one shooter and he is dead.

I am more than a little concerned that we are not hearing much in the news about the presumably still active investigation. Concerned because (1) it makes me wonder if they have hit a dead end, and (2) the lack of news leads
to conspiracy theories.


* SLMR 2.1a * This message protected by DALETECH!!
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)