Aaron Thomas wrote to Björn Felten <=-
I'm going by what your cousins (the media) are telling me. There's been
a noticeable increase in reported transportation disasters since
Buttigieg became Secretary of Transportation.
I'm going by what your cousins (the media) are telling me. There's be a noticeable increase in reported transportation disasters since Buttigieg became Secretary of Transportation.
Funny thing... The same thing happened in Atlas Shrugged when the Elitists appointed an incompetent to the same position. The book, of course, had more train problems than anything else, but still...
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
It was creepy enough to see all this happening, but now it's even
scarier to know that the leftists potentially had this awful plan on
the back burner for some time.
I'm also scared of the Terminator scenario. What's China gonna do with
all those robots they've got? NOT use them to assassinate absconders?
Joking aside, the Chinese economy is very close to collapse. They won't have the resources to do anything soon.
Which is probably one of the reasons that the Leftists have moved
forward more quickly with their plans.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
I like how you're always thinking positively. That's the way to go. But
we need to be vigilant. China pulls Democrat strings, and Democrats
pull weak-minded American strings.
The globalists have managed to hide massive protests in Panama and in Japan. The protests in Panama were about over-mining and oppression,
and the protests in Japan were about the pandemic treaty. This was
hidden quite well from the American people.
The globalists work as a
team, so what will they hide from us next?
There could be an
android-on-human massacre in China and we'd never know about it. We
could even be manufacturing our own assassins.
Japan. The protests in Panama were about over-mining and oppression, and the protests in Japan were about the pandemic treaty. This was hidden quite well from the American people.
From the American Sheep. The news that I watch reported on those.
This is part of the Elitist plan: They take an institution that people trust, subvert it and start spewing lies from it. The sheeple can't
think for themselves and just accept the propaganda as true.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
There are a few Americans here and there who are catching on, and we
are the ones who should devise a plan to lift others out of the
darkness.
We just need like 1 broadcast TV station. I think that would enable us
to fix everything. It's so easy to prove leftists wrong, but it's so difficult to do it in front of a large audience.
We just need like 1 broadcast TV station. I think that would enable u to fix everything. It's so easy to prove leftists wrong, but it's so difficult to do it in front of a large audience.
Why do you think that the Elitists took over the instutions first?
Fox "News" is obviously Controlled Oppositioni now.
OANN is trying to make it go, but they are getting forced off the cable companies' lineups.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
They really went all-out, and it's paying off for them for the time
being. $3.5 trillion for one gimmick, and $2.2 trillion for another,
and the American people barely even notice that money missing. They
would have never pulled off these heists without having invested in television (and other institutions.)
I had DirecTV Now for a while, and I enjoyed OANN. Senate Democrats
became wise to it and they convinced DirecTV to get rid of OANN, but
yet they still carry Fox News. (Red flag!)
The Propaganda Ministry (aka Mainstream Media) keeps gaslighting us and telling us that what we can see with our own eyes is false.
So the Elitists have taken over the instututions and now the
instutitions are failing because the public no longer trusts them.
Yup. I currently get OANN through the internet. But for a period of
time my cable company actually blocked their DNS entry.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Fox News is probably telling the truth about how they're "the most
watched cable news channel," because people probably think that they
are correcting themselves by making the switch from CNN (for example)
to Fox. The sad part is that they're just going to get propagated in a slightly different way.
I noticed that I can't go to oann.com. It has to be www.oann.com. For
most web admins using Apache2, that's an easy fix, but I wonder if
there's something or someone preventing OANN from setting up that redirection.
Yup. I currently get OANN through the internet. But for a
period of time my cable company actually blocked their DNS entry.
I noticed that I can't go to oann.com. It has to be www.oann.com. For
most web admins using Apache2, that's an easy fix, but I wonder if
there's something or someone preventing OANN from setting up that redirection.
I noticed that I can't go to oann.com. It has to be www.oann.com. For most web admins using Apache2, that's an easy fix, but I wonder if there's something or someone preventing OANN from setting up that redirection.
It is any easy fix. It's apparent the incompetency at that
organization goes deeper than just their reporters and editors.
oann.com does not have an A record in DNS. "www.oann.com" points to cloudflare (which is a SaaS firewall/CDN system)
I noticed that I can't go to oann.com. It has to be www.oann.com.For AT> most web admins using Apache2, that's an easy fix, but I wonder
if AT> there's something or someone preventing OANN from setting up that
redirection.
It is any easy fix. It's apparent the incompetency at that
organization goes deeper than just their reporters and editors.
oann.com does not have an A record in DNS. "www.oann.com" points to
cloudflare (which is a SaaS firewall/CDN system)
Yea, I don't see any way that this is anybody's fault besides their own. They have a great looking website. I don't get why they wouldn't want non www visitors. Visitors will try it without the www, fail to establish a connection, and then never visit the site again.
Yea, I don't see any way that this is anybody's fault besides their o They have a great looking website. I don't get why they wouldn't want www visitors. Visitors will try it without the www, fail to establish connection, and then never visit the site again.
Let's be fair, their target demographic will type "OAN.COM" into the Google search box and click on the first link that pops up.
Yea, I don't see any way that this is anybody's fault besides theiro AT> They have a great looking website. I don't get why they wouldn't
want AT> www visitors. Visitors will try it without the www, fail to
establish AT> connection, and then never visit the site again.
Let's be fair, their target demographic will type "OAN.COM" into the
Google search box and click on the first link that pops up.
Yea it's not a good domain name because the spelling of it isn't straightforward enough. It would be smart for them to own OAN.COM in addition to OANN.COM.
But despite their dumb web admin, they have excellent news reporters.
Both OANN and Newsmax get a "Low/Mixed" rating for factuality by Ad
Fontes Media and Media Bias Fact Check, two very reliable organizations that have incredibly good track records at categorizing news media organizations, both right and left.
Both OANN and Newsmax get a "Low/Mixed" rating for factuality by Ad
Fontes Media and Media Bias Fact Check, two very reliable organizations
that have incredibly good track records at categorizing news media
organizations, both right and left.
It's better to check facts for yourself instead of listening to what private companies have to say. Fact-checking "organizations" serve a very obvious purpose, and that purpose is not to "check facts."
A while back there was a Verizon commercial that said "According to Ruemetrics, Verizon is the most reliable network." The silly thing is that the commercial infers that "Ruemetrics" is some well-known source of information and that people should believe whatever conclusion they concoct. However, nobody ever heard of Ruemetrics then, and now it doesn't even exist anymore.
A while back there was a Verizon commercial that said "According to Ruemetrics, Verizon is the most reliable network." The silly thing is the commercial infers that "Ruemetrics" is some well-known source of information and that people should believe whatever conclusion they concoct. However, nobody ever heard of Ruemetrics then, and now it do even exist anymore.
The problem is you got the name wrong. It's "RootMetrics", a company that's been publishing network data gathered from corowdsourced and independent data gathering groups for over 15 years.
They were bogut by Ookla a few years back, to expand Ookla's extensive
and extremely reliable network/systems monitoring platforms.
You talk about checking facts for yourself, then you make statements that clearly indicate you don't practice what you preach
| Sysop: | deepend |
|---|---|
| Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
| Users: | 253 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 01:31:23 |
| Calls: | 1,647 |
| Files: | 4,003 |
| Messages: | 387,134 |