Breaking news: Democrats, who want anyone for president but Trump, tried to kill him today at a rally in Pennsylvania.
This is another way that Democrats differ from Republicans; When Democrats wan
someone out of their way, they'll kill them.
At this point the shooter has been identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks,
a registered republican.
Nice try by the MAGA idiots. Trying to make the convicted felon a martyr. It was a really good shot, by the way.
At least the archbishop of Ethiopia wasn't killed, just one of the fanatics behind him.
Breaking news: Democrats, who want anyone for president but Trump, tried to
kill him today at a rally in Pennsylvania.
This is another way that Democrats differ from Republicans; When Democrats want someone out of their way, they'll kill them.
Breaking news: Democrats, who want anyone for president but Trump, tried to
kill him today at a rally in Pennsylvania.
Wrong.
This is another way that Democrats differ from Republicans; When Democrats
want someone out of their way, they'll kill them.
At this point the shooter has been identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks, a registered republican.
This is another way that Democrats differ from Republicans; When Democrats
someone out of their way, they'll kill them.
At this point the shooter has been identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks, a re
Supposedly only conservatives believe in conspiracies but, so far, we have this and we have several non-conservatives in other venues claiming it was a hoax and no one was shot or killed.
Stupid is as stupid does.
At this point the shooter has been identified as Thomas Matthew
Crooks, a registered republican.
Nice try by the MAGA idiots. Trying to make the convicted felon a martyr. It
was a really good shot, by the way.
At least the archbishop of Ethiopia wasn't killed, just one of the fanatics
behind him.
Breaking news: Democrats, who want anyone for president but Trump, tried to kill him today at a rally in Pennsylvania.
Wrong.
This is another way that Democrats differ from Republicans; When Democrats wan
someone out of their way, they'll kill them.
At this point the shooter has been identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks, a registered republican.
His state registration doesn't mean anything. He also donated to a Democrat PAC. I can't say with certainty obviously what someone else's political ideology is, but if he is a Democrat out to get rid of Trump,
DemocratsThis is another way that Democrats differ from Republicans; When
someone out of their way, they'll kill them.
At this point the shooter has been identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks,a re
His state registration doesn't mean anything.
He also donated to a Democrat PAC.
I can't say with certainty obviously what someone else's political ideology is,
but if he is a Democrat
out to get rid of Trump, he's a moron.
All shooting him does is give him even more support.
So what makes this archbishop of Ethiopia so special?
Breaking news: Democrats, who want anyone for president but Trump, tr to kill him today at a rally in Pennsylvania.
This is another way that Democrats differ from Republicans; When Democrats want someone out of their way, they'll kill them.
There are a lot of questions...
Facebook feed full of a lot of lefties mad because the shooter missed.
So what makes this archbishop of Ethiopia so special?
Only those who have watched Shooter (2007) with Mark Wahlberg will understand that.
The more I see the more I believe the Secret Service was involved. The difference with JFK's assassination an the one that they tried on Trump nwas that there were 40,000 cameras at Trump's and is there ever a sh!t load of evidence to plow through.
The director of the Secret Service was appointed by Biden 2 years ago. She's a former agent so she probably has a pretty good idea about how to cover things up.
I'd like to hear what you friend Dan Bongino (Spelling)has to say.
There is a report out... more than 1 source... Local cop confronts shooter, shooter points gun at cop... cop retreats off the roof. kid shoots at Trump.
What the... Every time something like this goes down they always make
the shooter out to be a lone gunman.
I haven't heard about that, but I don't doubt it. Democrats are big,
big, big spenders. They wouldn't just invest in some 20 year old kid. They'd go big. They'd invest in the secret service, 2 or 3 police departments, and a 20 year old kid.
I'd like know what his social media posts were like... I'd like to hear what friends and family think.
From what I can see, from the news and social media, there are videos of peo telling the authorities about a man on the roof with a gun.
What the... Every time something like this goes down they always make the shooter out to be a lone gunman.
I think that the Elitists know they dodged a bullet (along with Trump) because if the attempt on Trump had succeeded, it would have started a hot civil war and the Elitist operatives would have been very high on the list of ones do go next.
But do we even have people on our side who are willing to more than just cast a ballot? All we ever do is vote, while the leftists are controlling the airwaves, infiltrating government agencies, mis-educating the kids, and emptying jails.
I doubt that the secret service is struggling with incompetence. It's more likely that they're serving the world's elite and trying to kill Trump. They don't seem to have any problem protecting Obama or Bush.
This story about a local cop is fishy, as I said I have heard this from more than 1 source. Then to boot... The FBI, who usually say they
cannot comment on this because of an on going investigation....
Commented.
You have to be careful with those, though. Some of them were clearly filmed after the assassin had already been killed but are being passed
off as before. Others are a bunch of sound but the picture is not of anything but the ground. --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
Until they find evidence to the contrary, he is a lone gunman.
What was the FBI comment about? All I can find is just a few minor
details on their website.
Of course I don't trust the FBI either. Not after Jim Comey, and not
after Obama.
What was the FBI comment about? All I can find is just a few minor details on their website.
Of course I don't trust the FBI either. Not after Jim Comey, and not after Obama.
The FBI denied that a local cop went on the roof and confronted the shooter... Her did nothing and retreated back down to the ground.
The only way they could make that determination would be if that police department uses bodycams and if they shared the footage with the FBI.
Could this be another case of "Don't question the experts?"
The only way they could make that determination would be if that poli department uses bodycams and if they shared the footage with the FBI.
Could this be another case of "Don't question the experts?"
I'm okay to wait and see the evidence... I would prefer to see a congressional hearing, it needs to be public.
From what I can see, from the news and social media, there are videos of
peope telling the authorities about a man on the roof with a gun.
You have to be careful with those, though. Some of them were clearly filmed
after the assassin had already been killed but are being passed off as before.
Others are a bunch of sound but the picture is not of anything but the ground.
Until they find evidence to the contrary, he is a lone gunman.
There is supposedly a large percentage of gun owners, who one could imagine believe in 2A rights, that are not even registered to vote. So they are not even casting ballots. There is at least one Trump
supporter in BBS land (who posts frequently on Dovenet) who recently bragged about not being registered to vote.
I would not even count on people on your side to even cast ballots.
The Secret Service that was present at the rally did their job. The detail that came up with the initial security plan, which didn't include someone on that nearby roof, are the ones whose methods are coming into question from both Democrat and Republican congresspeople.
"The Democrat party tried to kill Trump" is just as bad as the conspiracy theory that "there was no shooter (or there was and he was a MAGA
martyr) and the Trump team faked it all." If they were trying to kill him, they really goofed when they shot the shooter dead.
It means a lot to the registrar of voters. And to those who work
the polls. Fact is, he is a card-carrying Republican. To your own embarrassment.
You have to be careful with those, though. Some of them were clearly filmed after the assassin had already been killed but are being passed off as before. Others are a bunch of sound but the picture is not of anything but the ground. --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
I am fully suspicious of anything the DOJ/FBI/CIA have to say about anything. >think we'll never get the full truth from them anyway. Once we get a "NORMAL" >government in we can explore any failures and hold some people accountable.
I'm okay to wait and see the evidence... I would prefer to see a congressional >hearing, it needs to be public.
I agree. It needs to be public, and people need to know that there is reasonable speculation of Democrat involvement.
Prior to the J6 investigation the minority always got to choose their representatives.
We need a bipartisan open and public investigation.
It means a lot to the registrar of voters. And to those who work
the polls. Fact is, he is a card-carrying Republican. To your own
embarrassment.
Way to miss the point ;)
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
Democrats in my state made some changes pertaining to who can buy a
gun, but I didn't hear anyone complaining about it. I think we're more riled up about other stuff.
Democrats in my state made some changes pertaining to who can buy a gun, but I didn't hear anyone complaining about it. I think we're mor riled up about other stuff.
Standard Elitist Play: Distract everyone to focus on Topic 1, while you quietly pass legislation on Topic 2 so no one will notice or complain.
More so than Republicans, supposedly. Chicago is a Democrat party stronghold and they have strict restrictions. I think your own home state is/was considering bans and restrictions.
Democrats in my state made some changes pertaining to who can buy a gun, but I
didn't hear anyone complaining about it. I think we're more riled up about other stuff.
I saw that one. You cannot tell whether or not it was before or after the shooting. Since there are no shots being fired, I would assume it was after but who knows.
I will revisit this thread with a link to the video when I find it..
But I thought it showed the gunman alive and on top of the roof, followed by a
woman shouting to officers that there's "someone on the roof," (after we just saw him alive and on the roof.)
If so many rallygoers saw a gunman beforehand, why weren't any of them yelling at Trump to get off stage? Or were they in on it, too?
In the video, it's just a lady who saw the guy on the roof, but this lady was close to the gunman and far away from the president.
The media doesn't provide much coverage of things that happen in the New York >government. We woke up one day to discover that bail was reformed and that the >jails were literally being emptied as a result. And we never saw it coming >until it was too late. The state's legislature did it all while we were >sleeping, in one night.
IB Joe mentioned a rumor that the gunman was confronted on the roof by a local policeman. Although the report didn't mention "on the roof," it
did say that a LEO did confront the gunman and then retreated.
The report also said that the current head of the Secret Service was taking responsibility for what happened, but would not step down.
In the video, it's just a lady who saw the guy on the roof, but this lad close to the gunman and far away from the president.
There is something odd about that. It sounds like there were some people "wandering around" either just inside of, or just outside of, the
security perimeter that were able to see the gunman. I wonder why they were allowed to be there if they really were not a part of the rally?
until it was too late. The state's legislature did it all while we were >sleeping, in one night.
Chances are that your state legislature has a website where you can keep track of what bills are proposed, up for vote, etc. You local media will mention some of them during newscasts but other news, like about what Trump has said or done today, etc., will push more boring stories about the legislature out of the news cycle.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Standard Elitist Play: Distract everyone to focus on Topic 1, while you quietly pass legislation on Topic 2 so no one will notice or complain.
The media doesn't provide much coverage of things that happen in the
New York government. We woke up one day to discover that bail was
reformed and that the jails were literally being emptied as a result.
And we never saw it coming until it was too late. The state's
legislature did it all while we were sleeping, in one night.
The report also said that the current head of the Secret Service was taking responsibility for what happened, but would not step down.
So far, it looks like a mistake was made by local police (whoever those officers near the shooter are.) But the narrative coming from Washington is that "it's the head of the secret service's fault." Somebody is definitely creating a distraction here, but I can't tell who it is for sure.
Yea obviously the people who were anywhere near the shooter were not people wh
were screened.
I'm not a security expert either, but I agree with you that unchecked spectators, 300 yards away or whatever, is a bad idea. They should stick with indoor rallies.
| Sysop: | deepend |
|---|---|
| Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
| Users: | 253 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 14:21:08 |
| Calls: | 1,646 |
| Files: | 3,994 |
| Messages: | 387,903 |