From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to All on Mon May 27 17:08:04 2024
I was reading an article from AP about the "Pandemic Treaty" and I came across this paragraph:
"Health officials are racing to get the world to agree to new ways to prepare for and fight an inevitable future pandemic. COVID-19 is fading into history as elections and crises like climate change and war compete for the public's attention."
How many things are wrong with this paragraph?
1) Why are health officials more concerned about controlling people than
they are about finding the biolabs and covid origins?
2) Why do they say that a future pandemic is inevitable? Covid wasn't inevitable, it was biolabs at work.
3) Why are they "racing?" What's the big rush? Somebody got a new virus in their pocket?
4) Why do they say that Covid-19 is fading into history? It's not! It's still around, and still killing people.
5) Who's distracted by elections? What sick things are they gonna do while we're watching the debates?
6) Which "sane" person is concerned about climate change while there are biolabs, 30 million illegal immigrants, and unprecedented deficit spending?
6) Why would anyone "compete for my attention?"
That's just 1 paragraph. Just imagine what the whole article can do to weak minded people!