Does anyone have a link to Joe Biden's "racial jungle" video?
I'm looking for the one where he says "I don't want my kids going to school in a racial jungle."
I know it's out there somewhere because I watched it on youtube in 2019.
I have a blog and I want to include the video in an article I plan to write regarding Democrats and their extremely racist history.
(But I can't find it anywhere now!)
(But I can't find it anywhere now!)
https://news.yahoo.com/joe-biden-worried-1977-certain-182631643.html
Thanks! I appreciate it. Unfortunately, this video doesn't actually show the footage.
Later on the conspiracies reinforced my thoughts... The timely insurance policies on the buildings.... and whatnot...
Guess what... I went to show my wife and they were all deleted...
Guess what... I went to show my wife and they were all deleted...
Did you find any fragments of the old footage? I think in the case of the missing Biden video, they edited the nasty phrase out of the version that's currently available. (Or I might be wrong and they might be 2 different videos, I couldn't say for sure.)
If you are talking about the twin towers falling faster than gravity... Nope... all gone... There's some idiot explaining how they fell... But I already saw the originals.
About Joe Biden and not wanting to raise his children in an ethnic jungle... Couldn't find that and I seven used Brave, the commies at
google didn't influence the search.
Does anyone have a link to Joe Biden's "racial jungle" video?
I'm looking for the one where he says "I don't want my kids going to school in
racial jungle."
I know it's out there somewhere because I watched it on youtube in 2019.
I have a blog and I want to include the video in an article I plan to write re
rding Democrats and their extremely racist history.
(But I can't find it anywhere now!)
My ideas changed on 911 when I was watching several videos that were narrated
engineers and physicists... They were showing things like the Buildings falli
faster than gravity would allow it... The building(s) were falling faster tha
structures were falling beside it.
BTW, buildings are made to resist gravity not fall down faster than it.
BTW, buildings are made to resist gravity not fall down faster than it.
Buildings damaged by burning jet fuel, and by large chucks of the
interior being damaged by the impact of a jet, are going to fall down. The infrastructure was missing or melting. The weight of the portion of the building above falling onto the rest was going to make them fall
down.
Structures will slowly stop resisting gravity once damaged as those were.
Whatever was inside was probably already falling, giving the outside appearance of everything falling "faster that gravity."
racial jungle."
I know it's out there somewhere because I watched it on youtube in 2019.
I have a blog and I want to include the video in an article I plan to wr re
rding Democrats and their extremely racist history.
(But I can't find it anywhere now!)
You might try rumble.com to find the video. I didn't look but that might be a place it would show up. I would imagine that google, etc., are trying to steer folks away from finding it easily.
Are you on on medical marijuana??
The engineer in the video was showing, what he said, was a controlled demoliti
of a building. For the building to drop faster than the material beside it..
The building needed assistance... Like dynamite taking out the floors beneath d taking out the subsequent....
If you drop a 10 pound ball or a 1000 pound ball at the same time they will dr
and and reach the earth at the same time. Gravity is constants, as per my ph
ics teacher, experts and the Internet.
BTW, it's called The Law of gravity for a reason... Mathematical and doesn't c
nge.
If you drop a 10 pound ball or a 1000 pound ball at the same time
they will dr
and and reach the earth at the same time. Gravity is constants, as
per my ph ics teacher, experts and the Internet.
BTW, it's called The Law of gravity for a reason... Mathematical and
doesn't c nge.
I also learned this in school. I ALSO learned that the Law of Gravity
is not the only force that affects the fall. They only reach the
ground at the same time in a controlled environment where gravity is
the only force acting on them.
For example, if you drop a 10 pound ball and a sheet of paper from a 10-story building, the ball will fall straight down. The paper will
float on whatever wind current is around.
The forces at work in downtown NYC on the morning of 9/11 were hardly restricted to gravity alone.
The forces at work in downtown NYC on the morning of 9/11 were MP>hardlyrestricted to gravity alone.
"Newton's law of universal gravitation" is just the formula that describes how masses attract. (attraction force is proportional to the product of the
mass of the objects, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers)
Technically, gravitational attraction is classified as a scientific theory.
People often misconstrue "theory" for "hyphothesis" or even "idea".
Sometimes I'll remind them that gravity is classified as a theory, and invite them to jump off something tall to test it.
@MSGID: 2:203/2 6590c710
@REPLY: 1:154/30 65904d61
@PID: JamNNTPd/Win32 1
@CHRS: CP437 2
@TZUTC: 0100
@TID: CrashMail II/Win32 0.71
Hello Mike,
[..]
The forces at work in downtown NYC on the morning of 9/11 were MP>hardly
restricted to gravity alone.
"Newton's law of universal gravitation" is just the formula that
describes how masses attract. (attraction force is proportional to the
product of the mass of the objects, and inversely proportional to the
square of the distance between their centers)
Did you write that yourself?
Technically, gravitational attraction is classified as a scientific
theory.
A guess. Whether educated or not, just a guess.
If made by a scientist, it would appear to us as magic.
Even though it is just a guess.
People often misconstrue "theory" for "hyphothesis" or even "idea".
Arthur C. Clarke called it "magic" ...
Sometimes I'll remind them that gravity is classified as a theory, and
invite them to jump off something tall to test it.
MAGA nutjobs do it all the time.
But how many of them land on their feet?
hardly restricted to gravity alone.The forces at work in downtown NYC on the morning of 9/11 were
"Newton's law of universal gravitation" is just the formula that
describes how masses attract. (attraction force is proportional to the
product of the mass of the objects, and inversely proportional to the
square of the distance between their centers)
Did you write that yourself?
I typed it. It was drilled into my head exactly like that many years ago.
Technically, gravitational attraction is classified as a scientific
theory.
A guess. Whether educated or not, just a guess.
If made by a scientist, it would appear to us as magic.
Even though it is just a guess.
That's a hypothesis, then. A theory is backed up by observation, experimentation, and peer review.
People often misconstrue "theory" for "hyphothesis" or even "idea".
Arthur C. Clarke called it "magic" ...
No, that was "technology"
Sometimes I'll remind them that gravity is classified as a theory, and
invite them to jump off something tall to test it.
MAGA nutjobs do it all the time.
But how many of them land on their feet?
Wouldn't matter much if it was tall enough.
| Sysop: | deepend |
|---|---|
| Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
| Users: | 253 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 01:41:55 |
| Calls: | 1,647 |
| Files: | 4,003 |
| Messages: | 387,134 |