You know how competitive Trump is... He'll should ask Tucker for a Mulligan and get a new interview... He needs to Make Interviews Great Again!!!
You know how competitive Trump is... He'll should ask Tucker for a Mulligan and get a new interview... He needs to Make Interviews Great Again!!!
I just read on Fox News that Univision interviewed Trump and they were soft on him! And it made the reptilians from the other news agencies angry!
It was a heart-warming story.
I just read on Fox News that Univision interviewed Trump and they were soft on >im! And it made the reptilians from the other news agencies angry!
It was a heart-warming story.
It was a heart-warming story.
I saw a little of that interview ... They are fully on the Trump Train yet... Soon!!!
The Fox News article said something about Univision being under new ownership. Maybe it was purchased by warm-blooded human beings.
I just read on Fox News that Univision interviewed Trump and they were so >im! And it made the reptilians from the other news agencies angry!
It was a heart-warming story.
To this day, I still don't think that anyone has softballed and gushed more over a candidate during an interview than Katie Couric did over HRC.
I don't remember that one, but every time a reporter interviews a Democrat, the
always forget to ask "Why are we changing the demographic?" and "Was it worth
t for 2000 people to die along the border?"
(We know the answers to those questions, but I want them to ask them anyway!)
Someone does need to be asked some hardball questions about the border. One of those people who need to be asked such questions rarely seems to give interviews anymore. That'd be Biden's appointed border czar, Kamala Harris.
She's well protected from questions.
She would have no choice but to either lie or to say "We're replacing whites w
h browns because we think we can manipulate them the same way that we do with e blacks."
To lie, and say something like "This administration is committed to border sec
ity," would be too hard for her to say without cackling. (I wouldn't be able t
say it without laughing either.)
She would have no choice but to either lie or to say "We're replacing wh w
h browns because we think we can manipulate them the same way that we do e blacks."
You would have to ask direct but tactful questions. Asking a question that might result in that answer would instead result in labeling the questioner as racist, something that you'd want to avoid.
Mike Powell wrote to AARON THOMAS <=-
You would have to ask direct but tactful questions. Asking a question that might result in that answer would instead result in labeling the questioner as racist, something that you'd want to avoid.
Instead, you'd want to cite numbers and other facts, and also probably include some questions regarding issues that NYC Mayor Adams has
brought up.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
Right! But my angle is to get the Democrat to admit to how despicable their actions are with this "replacement theory" of theirs.
You would have to ask direct but tactful questions. Asking a question that might result in that answer would instead result in labeling the questioner as racist, something that you'd want to avoid.
It won't make any difference. They will label you a "racist" as soon as they see that they are losing the argument.
Instead, you'd want to cite numbers and other facts, and also probably include some questions regarding issues that NYC Mayor Adams has
brought up.
"... and what makes them [Lefties] tremendously dangerous is that facts that contradict what they believe are simply ignored or evaded." -- Thomas Sowell
| Sysop: | deepend |
|---|---|
| Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
| Users: | 253 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 01:43:47 |
| Calls: | 1,647 |
| Files: | 4,003 |
| Messages: | 387,134 |