Kevin McCarthy should be recognized as the GOP speaker of the house who suppor
d child sex trafficking for a whole year, and when he had a chance to put an e
to it, he chose to allow it for at least an additional 45 days.
It would be very stupid for us to believe that the border will be addressed in
5 days. It won't!
It would be very stupid for us to believe that the border will be addres in
5 days. It won't!
It won't, that is true, but I am not sure I understand how letting the government shutdown would have helped it, either. My feelings are that
a goverment shutdown could leave the boarder even less guarded than it
is now.
Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-
It would be very stupid for us to believe that the border will be addressed in 45 days. It won't!
McCarthy reneged on his promises to get elected Speaker, so Gaetz was completely correct in filing the motion to get him removed.
Side note: Has anyone noticed how quickly the Bowman crime has faded from nearly all news sites?
It seems weird that the Democrats voted against McCarthy, but I think it's reve
se psychology at play; the Democrats want us to think that they were opposed to
McCarthy's speakership, when really, they were enjoying it. Surely their votes >gainst McCarthy were ordered by someone above them.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
It seems weird that the Democrats voted against McCarthy, but I think
it's reverse psychology at play; the Democrats want us to think that
they were opposed to McCarthy's speakership, when really, they were enjoying it. Surely their votes against McCarthy were ordered by
someone above them.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
Side note: Has anyone noticed how quickly the Bowman crime has faded from nearly all news sites?
He thought the alarm lever, and not the door handle, would open the
door. The MSM has probably bought that excuse so why cover it? :(
He thought the alarm lever, and not the door handle, would open the door. The MSM has probably bought that excuse so why cover it? :(
I expected it from the MSM. "Just a Democrat performing an insurrection, nothing to see here."
But it also dropped off the alternative news sources too.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
Interesting. Maybe they realized that no one was going to do anything about it so why bother?
Or maybe they, too, are getting paid to cover other things.
Interesting. Maybe they realized that no one was going to do anything about it so why bother?
If that's the case, why bother to report any of the Democrat crimes?
For example, we're still waiting for the Democrat Operatives in Detroit that pulled out unvetted boxes of ballots and ran them through the tabulator - several times - to be charged.
And, yes, this did happen. We have video evidence.
Or maybe they, too, are getting paid to cover other things.
Now that is disturbing.
McCarthy's speakership, when really, they were enjoying it. Surely their >gainst McCarthy were ordered by someone above them.
The only way that'd be true would be if they think they can vote someone in who is even more on their side that you believe McCarthy to have been... and that is likely what we will wind up with.
I think it is all a smoke screen... get rid of McCarthy so MAGA folks
are happy. Meanwhile, until there is a new speaker, they can sit on
their hands and not do anything because, legally, when there is a
speaker vacancy they must elect one before they do anything else.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
That seems real odd since 2016 was all about foreign interferance, yet from the way he tells many clients have not really done much since then
to prevent being hacked.
Or maybe they, too, are getting paid to cover other things.Now that is disturbing.
Indeed, but it is also possible.
I think it is all a smoke screen... get rid of McCarthy so MAGA folks are happy. Meanwhile, until there is a new speaker, they can sit on their hands and not do anything because, legally, when there is a speaker vacancy they must elect one before they do anything else.
But they wouldn't be doing anything anyway. Was McCarthy about to do anything gnificant to our benefit?
That seems real odd since 2016 was all about foreign interferance, yet from the way he tells many clients have not really done much since then to prevent being hacked.
Elitists were never for actually doing something and typically did "crisis management" (i.e. don't do anything until it becomes a crisis) because to do something would draw off resources meant for their pockets.
The whole "foreign interference" in 2016 was just an excuse why Hilary was soundly rejected by the voters. But I do think that was the start of the Elitists looking into how to subvert the voting process.
But they wouldn't be doing anything anyway. Was McCarthy about to do any gnificant to our benefit?
He kept the government running. If the government isn't running, that
(to me) means the border is even less protected than it already is. Is that what we wanted? I don't think so.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
The whole "foreign interference" in 2016 was just an excuse why Hilary was soundly rejected by the voters. But I do think that was the start of the Elitists looking into how to subvert the voting process.
I agree on both counts, but it seems odd (to me) that they are not
really addressing real problems, for potential bad actor interference, that do exist.
You're technically right but we've had gov shutdowns before and from what I un
rstand, essential departments still run during a shutdown. The president doesn
go home without pay during a shut-down, for example. I suspect that border pa
ol is considered essential. Federal prisons are essential; they won't release e prisoners just because of a shut-down.
Right?
The whole "foreign interference" in 2016 was just an excuse why Hilary was soundly rejected by the voters. But I do think that was the start of the Elitists looking into how to subvert the voting process.
I agree on both counts, but it seems odd (to me) that they are not really addressing real problems, for potential bad actor interference, that do exist.
That's because they think that **they** are the bad actor that interferes.
If they addressed the real problems, it would close off more avenues for them to cheat.
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 253 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 13:40:36 |
Calls: | 1,646 |
Files: | 3,994 |
Messages: | 387,901 |