• Re: 2nd Presidential Deba

    From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Wed Sep 27 07:49:21 2023
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    The "polling" joke should be a red flag for people. People hear the
    word "poll" and they think that it's a message from God.

    Yes, it should be a red flag. This is another place where the Elitists warped the language for their own purpose.

    Most people are conditioned to believe that a poll is a representative slice of the population, so a poll would (at least fairly) accurately represent the public. The facts are that the polls are highly skewed in favor of whoever is producing them (usually Elitist Propaganda organizations).

    We need to always look at the "who" behind any study/poll/etc. so that we can see the bias.

    Hutchinson would make a great president, but surely the RNC isn't
    looking for "greatness."

    No. The last thing the Uniparty wants is someone who will shake them off.


    ... You will be told about it tomorrow. Go home and prepare
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/200 to Ron L. on Wed Sep 27 08:45:38 2023
    word "poll" and they think that it's a message from God.

    Yes, it should be a red flag. This is another place where the Elitists warped the language for their own purpose.

    Most people are conditioned to believe that a poll is a representative slice of the population, so a poll would (at least fairly) accurately represent the public. The facts are that the polls are highly skewed in favor of whoever is producing them (usually Elitist Propaganda organizations).

    Every time I hear on the news "According to a recent poll..." I just want them to stop right there and explain how the poll was conducted, and I want names and addresses of the poll's participants. They can't honestly say "we randomly selected participants from around the USA" because obviously it's illegal to call people randomly to ask them questions. (DONOTCALL.GOV)

    Maybe this "poll" gimmick made more sense in the 80s, prior to the modern laws that prevent people from making those phonecalls. But it's hard to teach an old brainwashed zombie new tricks.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Dale Shipp@1:261/1466 to Ron L. on Thu Sep 28 01:32:00 2023
    On 09-27-23 07:49, Ron L. <=-
    spoke to Aaron Thomas about Re: 2nd Presidential Deba <=-

    the public. The facts are that the polls are highly skewed in favor of whoever is producing them (usually Elitist Propaganda organizations).

    We need to always look at the "who" behind any study/poll/etc. so that
    we can see the bias.

    You are speaking truth. The group making the poll can easily influence
    the bias by the wording in their questions and even by their selection
    of the population they are polling.

    The national poll numbers are weighted averages of many polls from
    groups with all sorts of biases. That makes them a "little" bit more
    reliable, but even so they are only a temporary snapshot in time.

    Dale Shipp
    fido_261_1466 (at) verizon (dot) net
    (1:261/1466)


    ... Shipwrecked in Silver Spring, Maryland. 01:36:08, 28 Sep 2023
    ___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

    --- Maximus/NT 3.01
    * Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Gregory Deyss on Thu Sep 28 07:55:31 2023
    Gregory Deyss wrote to Dr. What <=-

    I could beat Old-man Asa, Pence Dispense and Double Quarter Pounder w/ Cheese Christie.

    But that's not saying too much. A rock has more personality than most of those "candidates" and it more trustworthy.


    ... If it screams, it's not food, yet....
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Thu Sep 28 07:55:31 2023
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    Every time I hear on the news "According to a recent poll..." I just
    want them to stop right there and explain how the poll was conducted,
    and I want names and addresses of the poll's participants.

    That goes for "studies" and "research" as well.

    They can't
    honestly say "we randomly selected participants from around the USA" because obviously it's illegal to call people randomly to ask them questions. (DONOTCALL.GOV)

    Sadly, the do-not-call-list doesn't apply to political calls. I'm not sure about general poll calls. I'm sure about telemarketer cold calls (not that it stops anyone based on the number I still get).

    Maybe this "poll" gimmick made more sense in the 80s, prior to the
    modern laws that prevent people from making those phonecalls. But it's hard to teach an old brainwashed zombie new tricks.

    Calling it a "gimmick" is correct. That's just what it is: Propaganda to make the gullible think that "everyone" is thinking a certain way.


    ... Women were meant to be loved, not understood.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)