IB Joe wrote to All <=-
I was watching the News and the stupidest thing I have ever heard in my life was before my eyes...
The Democrats want to construct HUGE machines to suck carbon out of the air... SUCK carbon out of the air... Of course it'll cost billions and possibly trillions.
This happens naturally... Trees do it.. take carbon dioxide out of the
air and replaces it with oxygen....
Why can't they just plant some trees.
Structures that suck carbon out of the air...
It's like the idiot who's running Chinada right now... going on about carbon t
es ... Like taxing something is going to fix things... Truth be told... China
does NOT have a huge carbon footprint... in fact the number is negative.... B
AUSE ~80% of the country is empty and full of trees with oceans on 3 sides. B
yet the Liberal government will virtue signal to all the other globalists abo
their carbon tax and the stupidity
Structures that suck carbon out of the air...
I was watching the News and the stupidest thing I have ever heard in my life was before my eyes...
The Democrats want to construct HUGE machines to suck carbon out of the air... SUCK carbon out of the air... Of course it'll cost billions and possibly trillions.
AOC said something? Or was it Biden? :)
Actually, what it will do is funnel billion/trilions of tax dollars into holding companies run by their cronies who will never produce anything.
Standard Democrat Practice.
If we want to reduce the carbon footprint, we can always get rid of all our gov't. The amount of CO2 they generate without any benefit is astounding.
Structures that suck carbon out of the air...
That does sound dumb, but I just read the gender-minotaur post, so this
is only the second-dumbest thing I have read so far this morning. :)
Stupid are the people who fall for it, but smart are the Democrat strategists who invented "global warming" years ago and now "climate change."
Just ask any excitable idiot "Do you like having an earth to live on?"
and the answer is going to be "Yes!" Then ask them if they're gonna vote for the candidate who wants to "save the earth" or the candidate who
wants to "save the money." Excitable idiots will go with the first
option.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Actually, what it will do is funnel billion/trilions of tax dollars into holding companies run by their cronies who will never produce anything.
Standard Democrat Practice.
Yup, that's exactly what I thought... U'd think someone would speak up about this...
Aaron Thomas wrote to IB Joe <=-
Stupid are the people who fall for it, but smart are the Democrat strategists who invented "global warming" years ago and now "climate change."
Just ask any excitable idiot "Do you like having an earth to live on?"
and the answer is going to be "Yes!" Then ask them if they're gonna
vote for the candidate who wants to "save the earth" or the candidate
who wants to "save the money." Excitable idiots will go with the first option.
vote for the candidate who wants to "save the earth" or the candidate who wants to "save the money." Excitable idiots will go with the firs option.
Which demonstrates how the schools have been failing for a long, long
time now.
They produce people who can't think for themselves and blindly defer to the "experts". They cannot question anything - and, really, it makes
them nervous to question the experts.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
"Don't question the experts" is not in my vocabulary. The media are not
an expert at anything besides broadcasting the media.
A real scientist makes his or her own statistics. Doesn't just follow
some narrative that begins with "Studies suggest...". The media makes people think that they don't have to figure anything out, because they want us to believe that "everything is just so obvious" when it's obviously not.
The schools though? All I know is that they're opening kids up to the gender thing a little, but I won't let that distract me from bigger
issues at hand.
The schools though? All I know is that they're opening kids up to the gender thing a little, but I won't let that distract me from bigger issues at hand.
The schools are where it all starts. They need to beat curiosity, critical thinking and logic at an early age to make adults that are compliant.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
In my state, school-age kids are propagated at school, propagated by
the media when they get home, and then if they work for the state when they grow up, they're forced to pay union dues which fund the Democrat party.
And Republicans combat the issue by accepting bribes and by saying
things like "I don't want to normalize impeachment."
My dad was in the Teacher's Union way back when. But many of the
teachers in his school started seeing the corruption and didn't want to fund it. Back then Teachers could leave the Union, but they made it as difficult as possible (small window of time, during the time of year
most people were on vacation, etc.). And even then, they still forced
you to pay some dues because "the Union negotiates on your behalf."
And Republicans combat the issue by accepting bribes and by saying things like "I don't want to normalize impeachment."
Republicans are a sham. They are fake opposition to give us the
illusion that we have choice.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
That's becoming more and more obvious. Republicans have had
opportunities to battle labor unions, but they chose not to. They
should be doing something about labor unions right this minute, but they're more focused on their taglines and cheesy sales pitch than they are on actually defeating tyrants.
I want to start looking in to their sources of funding. I wonder how
many Elitist doners I can find.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
I want to start looking in to their sources of funding. I wonder how
many Elitist doners I can find.
Mike Pence don't get it that nobody (other than the media) likes him. Somebody is "investing" money into his lost cause, but he's as
undesirable as Chris Christie.
Mike Pence don't get it that nobody (other than the media) likes him. Somebody is "investing" money into his lost cause, but he's as undesirable as Chris Christie.
I keep wondering if they are really that clueless (an indication that
they are Elitist since those people have no self-awareness), or are they getting paid as fake opposition to draw support from stronger
candidates, or just to create the illusion that there is choice.
Mike Pence don't get it that nobody (other than the media) likes
Somebody is "investing" money into his lost cause, but he's as undesirable as Chris Christie.
I keep wondering if they are really that clueless (an indication that they are Elitist since those people have no self-awareness), or are th
getting paid as fake opposition to draw support from stronger candidates, or just to create the illusion that there is choice.
The Elitists want us to think that Biden is "polling badly," because phrases like that trigger the liberal "activists" who pop up around election day.
But at the same, they want us to think that Trump is wounded by all the bogus accusations.
With no choice left, they think we'll support some puppet jerk like
Pence or Christie. (It won't work! It's gonna be Biden or Trump!)
I still can't find a single leftist who has anything bad to say about Biden.They could care less, according to some Four Dollar a gallon,
I still can't find a single leftist who has anything bad to say GD> GD> AT> GD> AT> AT> aboutThey could care less, according to some Four Dollar a gallon,
Biden.
You're right not one of these snowflakes mentions anything bad about Biden. There is plenty of subject matter to discuss.
home on a little lake outside the home, not a lake a big pond. It hit
the wire and came up underneath our home, into the...air condition ducts.
"To make a long story short, I almost lost my wife, my 67 Corvette, and
my cat," the president added.
Joe Biden Sending $700 to Maui Fire Victims Sparks Backlash: 'Insulting'
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
The Elitists want us to think that Biden is "polling badly," because phrases like that trigger the liberal "activists" who pop up around election day.
I still can't find a single leftist who has anything bad to say about Biden.
I still can't find a single leftist who has anything bad to say about Biden.
In all truth, I don't know if that's because they don't support Biden any more,
or because they don't have time to post on social media since they have to take
a second job to make ends meet under Bidenomics.
I still can't find a single leftist who has anything bad to say about Biden.
And you probably won't. Those people can't ever admit when they are wrong.
But it's what I **don't** hear that's important. Their "Rah! Rah!
Biden!" drivel has fallen silent.
In all truth, I don't know if that's because they don't support Biden
any more, or because they don't have time to post on social media since they have to take a second job to make ends meet under Bidenomics.
I still can't find a single leftist who has anything bad to say about Biden.
Neither can I! Isn't that amazing?
Mike Powell wrote to RON L. <=-
I suspect most of the rah-rah Biden crowd that I had access to on
social media either unfriended me or put me on some sort of restriction
so I don't see their posts. Or it could just be the FB algorithm.
Most of what I see now are ads and a lot of "shorts" that appear to be women trying to draw attention to an Only Fans site.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Ron L. <=-
It's because the people on TV haven't made up their minds about Biden
yet. The people on TV are considering installation of a new "yes-man,"
and after the TV people make up their minds, they will also have made
up the minds of our leftist pals. (Really it's all up to Jimmy Kimmel.)
aboutI still can't find a single leftist who has anything bad to say
Biden.
Neither can I! Isn't that amazing?
Ha! Biden must be doing something right!
Ha! Biden must be doing something right!
Well, to be honest, he does have some help. From Kamala Harris.
Just imagine the choice he will have to make once he nominates her
to replace a retiring justice on the US Supreme Court.
Ha! Biden must be doing something right!
Well, to be honest, he does have some help. From Kamala Harris.
Just imagine the choice he will have to make once he nominates her
to replace a retiring justice on the US Supreme Court.
The right thing to do would be to let the next president nominate the next supreme court justice, since we're so close to the end of Joe's term.
you remember how awful it was when "tyrant Trump" nominated a supreme court
justice close to the end of his term. It was just despicable, wouldn't you agree?
The right thing to do would be to let the next president nominate LL> AT> the
supreme court justice, since we're so close to the end of Joe's LL> AT> term.
Tell that to Donald Trump. Who did that very thing.
Mitch McConnell gave him the order. Just as he had given that same
order years before to his minions in the Senate to keep Obama's choice from even being given a hearing.
But that's okay. We all know justice and fair play are not part of
your game. Just like it never has been for Mitch McConnell or Donald
Trump or anybody else in MAGA land.
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 253 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 13:45:06 |
Calls: | 1,646 |
Files: | 3,994 |
Messages: | 387,901 |