On 08-15-23 23:24, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to All about To good not to share <=-
This clip shows the Political Hypocrisy that shows the double
standard. Source: Fox News, Hannity
Before you think it is one sided.
Rachel Madow is caught with her fishy hands in the proverbial cookie
jar. Video does not lie folks...
If that is not bad enough Hillary is right behind Rachel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0Xt7Obpna8
Please try again. All I get from that link is a woman showing how to
knit tiny sandals. Even from the click links I can find nothing about Rachel.
https://tinyurl.com/4tvzwpyt
On 08-17-23 01:20, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: To good not to share <=-
https://tinyurl.com/4tvzwpyt
I did catch part of Hannity's show yesterday where he was talking about the hy
crisy of Democrats complaining about elections being stolen, but when a Republ
an complains, it's handcuffs and mugshots.
an complains, it's handcuffs and mugshots.
Part of the difference could be who they complain to, how they complain, and what actions they take regarding the complaint. Asking someone to "find votes" is not a good way to ask for a recount.
Hilary, and especially her supporters and the talking heads, complained but they were not caught making statements such as those.
I don't seem the harm saying "find the votes."
If you were the Georgia voting official, and he said that to you, how would yo
respond? Would you feel like your job is in danger if you don't do what the pr
ident says? He's got no authority over that employee, he knows it, and the emp
yee knows it too.
Asking someone to "find votes" is not a good way to ask for a MP>recount.
Hilary, and especially her supporters and the talking heads,MP<complained but they were not caught making statements such as MP>those.
I don't seem the harm saying "find the votes."
If you were the Georgia voting official, and he said that to you, how would
you respond?
Would you feel like your job is in danger if you don't do what the president
says?
He's got no authority over that employee, he knows it, and the employee knows it too.
Had he said those words to a military commander, then that would be different.
No, I would not feel like my job was in danger but I also would not feel like he was asking for a recount. I probably would have been wondering what votes he wanted me to find.
Had he said those words to a military commander, then that would be different.
Donald Trump was still commander in chief up to noon on January 20.
But not even a president can force an individual to commit an illegal
act.
On 08-19-23 00:24, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Here it is <=-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY9j0gaf3eI
or https://tinyurl.com/2zetpnms
Time stamp 3:46
On 08-19-23 00:24, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Here it is <=-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY9j0gaf3eI
or https://tinyurl.com/2zetpnms
Time stamp 3:46
You did not quote enough for me to be certain of the statement you had been making, but I have now scanned the referenced videos from Fox news. Hannity is displaying exerpts from MSNBC's Rachael Madow show interview with Hillary Clinton. Hillary is doing most of the talking. It starts before the time stamp you say -- and continues until after 4 minutes. During that time Rachael had about 5 seconds of speaking air time.
I am not at all certain as to what Fox is trying to prove
beHad he said those words to a military commander, then that would
different.
Donald Trump was still commander in chief up to noon on January 20.
But not even a president can force an individual to commit an illegal
act.
It's like if we were in a dry town
and I said "Lee, find the liquor.."
Every town is dry in these parts, temperature being well over
100 degrees for over two weeks without a break.
I am not at all certain as to what Fox is trying to prove -- but then I
never am quite certain as to what Fox is trying to say or prove.
Idiot!Every town is dry in these parts, temperature being well over
100 degrees for over two weeks without a break.
Yikes! That's boiling hot. No wonder all the water is boiled away.
On 08-20-23 13:12, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Here it is <=-
You did not quote enough for me to be certain of the statement you had been making, but I have now scanned the referenced videos from Fox news. Hannity is displaying exerpts from MSNBC's Rachael Madow show interview with Hillary Clinton. Hillary is doing most of the talking. It starts before the time stamp you say -- and continues until after 4 minutes. During that time Rachael had about 5 seconds of speaking air time.
Regardless of Rachael's speaking time within these short clips.
Hannity captures the conversation in a way that shows
Hillary as well as Rachael being Hypocrites.
watching, believing in every word spoken by this lesbian
clown but hold up Mr. Agreeable.
On 08-20-23 15:22, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Here it is <=-
I am not at all certain as to what Fox is trying to prove -- but then I never am quite certain as to what Fox is trying to say or prove.
I think I can sum it up. Madow and HRC were claiming *now* that a
when a defeated candidate, and members of the press, claim that an election is "stolen," it undermines our democracy.
They then included clips of both Madow and HRC, from 2016, where both claimed that the 2016 election was "stolen" and rigged.
So, if it undermines democracy now, why didn't it undermine democracy then?
IMHO, if it does now, it did then, but apparently neither Madow nor
HRC see it that way.
On 08-20-23 15:22, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Here it is <=-
I am not at all certain as to what Fox is trying to prove -- but then I never am quite certain as to what Fox is trying to say or prove.
I think I can sum it up. Madow and HRC were claiming *now* that a when a defeated candidate, and members of the press, claim that an election is "stolen," it undermines our democracy.
They then included clips of both Madow and HRC, from 2016, where both claimed that the 2016 election was "stolen" and rigged.
So, if it undermines democracy now, why didn't it undermine democracy then?
IMHO, if it does now, it did then, but apparently neither Madow nor HRC see it that way.
There is a big difference. For the 2016 election, although HRC had complaints arising from the Russian interference, she quickly conceded
the election to Trump.
For the 2020 election, Trump refused to accept the results nor to
concede. He continued to try to over turn the results by any means possible. Those actions have gotten him indicted in two different juristictions.
Donald Trump was still commander in chief up to noon on January 20.
But not even a president can force an individual to commit an illega
act.
It's like if we were in a dry town
Every town is dry in these parts, temperature being well over
100 degrees for over two weeks without a break. So dry that even
the crops have dried out, leaving nothing left to eat.
and I said "Lee, find the liquor.."
Absinthe! Nectar of the gods!
And the Sazerac! The next best thing!
People who think that democratic elections are all about picking the
right winner, are in dire need of re-education.
Mike Powell wrote to DALE SHIPP <=-
So, if it undermines democracy now, why didn't it undermine democracy then?
They then included clips of both Madow and HRC, from 2016, where both claimed that the 2016 election was "stolen" and rigged.
So, if it undermines democracy now, why didn't it undermine democracy then?
IMHO, if it does now, it did then, but apparently neither Madow nor
HRC see it that way.
There is a big difference. For the 2016 election, although HRC had complaints arising from the Russian interference, she quickly conceded
the election to Trump.
Idiot!
The boiling point of water is 212 degrees Fahrenheit
People who think that democratic elections are all about picking the
right winner, are in dire need of re-education.
Correct! We let the media decide for us.
Idiot!
The boiling point of water is 212 degrees Fahrenheit
You are actually amongst the less than 4% of the Earth's population, that are idiots.
How ironic, that you still stubbornly, as the only country in the world, hang on to the measuring system, that the Empire, that you
revolted against some 250 years ago, gave you. But no longer use. Not
even Canada...
An opinion is not really necessary when you have "the video" of Rachael and Hillary talking from both sides of their faces, from various times of the video record. Dates were also included. I did everything except draw you a map.Regardless of Rachael's speaking time within these short clips. Hannity captures the conversation in a way that shows
Hillary as well as Rachael being Hypocrites.
Your opinion, but not mine -- no surprise there.
Your transcript has almost nothing said by Rachael or Hillory that is
not accepted as true by the majority of the American people.
Why is the fact that Rachael is lesbian have any relevance?You would have to ask Rachael why, but that might be getting into the weeds.
Every town is dry in these parts, temperature being well over
100 degrees for over two weeks without a break.
Yikes! That's boiling hot. No wonder all the water is boiled away.
and I said "Lee, find the liquor.."
Absinthe! Nectar of the gods!
And the Sazerac! The next best thing!
You would *find the liquor* you would not *criticize the thirsty man."
Idiot!
The boiling point of water is 212 degrees Fahrenheit
You are actually amongst the less than 4% of the Earth's population, that are idiots.
How ironic, that you still stubbornly, as the only country in the world, hang on to the measuring system, that the Empire, that you revolted against
some 250 years ago, gave you. But no longer use. Not even Canada...
On 08-21-23 19:04, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Here it is <=-
Why is the fact that Rachael is lesbian have any relevance?
You would have to ask Rachael why, but that might be getting into the weeds.
Mike Powell wrote to DALE SHIPP <=-
The bigger difference is that the press had Hilary's back, and
continued to trumpet the "stolen" election long after she conceded. Gregory's initial point was regarding Rachael Madow, who is a member of that press and who apparently has a short memory.
As an aside, I am not sure why certain members of the press find it necessary to keep trotting Hilary out to give her opinions on such
things.
Here's a wee bit of the education that you missed:
Democracy (from Ancient Greek: demos 'people' and kratos 'rule') is a system of government and form of liberalism in which state power is
vested in the people, or the general population of a state based on principles of liberty and free will.
On 08-21-23 19:04, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Here it is <=-
Why is the fact that Rachael is lesbian have any relevance?
You would have to ask Rachael why, but that might be getting into the weeds.
NO. I asked you why you chose to make a point of it.
On 08-22-23 19:02, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Here it is <=-
Why is the fact that Rachael is lesbian have any relevance?
You would have to ask Rachael why, but that might
be getting into the
weeds.
NO. I asked you why you chose to make a point of it.
All of which I have said previous to the Lesbian Clown comment and
this is what you zero in on?
Idiot!
The boiling point of water is 212 degrees Fahrenheit
You are actually amongst the less than 4% of the Earth's population,
that are idiots.
How ironic, that you still stubbornly, as the only country in the
world, hang on to the measuring system, that the Empire, that you
revolted against some 250 years ago, gave you. But no longer use. Not
even Canada...
There are several points here that are beyond obvious.
First and foremost, I did mention the degree of Fahrenheit in which water boils, which was the fore mentioned degree of 212, and in addition I also included the Celsius of 100 in which water boils.
You're the one who thinks your being cute by removing the FACT that I also included 100 Celsius within the (my) post.
Do you think that by doing so, this makes you appear smart?
I mean seriously anyone can go back and see what I wrote, and they can see your sad attempt to ridicule me as it were.
Second Point, I am not employed by the U.S. Government nor and I employed by
the office of Weights and Measures.
Third Point, and it is quite extraordinary.
FYI: You're information is more than one hundred years out of date.
The Office of Weights and Measures (OWM) is the oldest office at NIST, predating even the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) and the Department of
Commerce. Our function, to "fix the standard of weights and measures," is explicitly mentioned in the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause
5).
https://www.nist.gov/pml/owm/metric-si/metric-policy
Here you will see an image that dates back to 1866.
Known as the Metric Act of 1866 also known as Kasson Act.
I didn't have any problem "with following along" but then again I am of the
Conservative mind set, and I'm dam proud to say so too. That also is obvious.
Why is the fact that Rachael is lesbian have any relevance?
You would have to ask Rachael why, but that might be getting into the weeds.
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 253 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 14:37:48 |
Calls: | 1,646 |
Files: | 3,994 |
Messages: | 387,903 |