On 06-19-23 09:01, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Ib Joe about Re: Bringing a knife to a <=-
Either way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother talking
to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read
his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
Either way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother talking
to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read
his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
You are stating an opinion that I formed a long time ago -- probably before he dropped his last name from his postings.
Either way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother talking to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read
his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
You are stating an opinion that I formed a long time ago -- probably
before he dropped his last name from his postings.
On 06-20-23 15:42, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Bringing a knife to <=-
Either way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother talking to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
You are stating an opinion that I formed a long time ago -- probably
before he dropped his last name from his postings.
Alan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although he
has in others.
alkingEither way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother
to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
You are stating an opinion that I formed a long time ago -- probably before he dropped his last name from his postings.
Alan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although he
has in others.
I was talking about Ron, not Alan.
On 06-21-23 15:48, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Bringing a knife to <=-
MP> alkingEither way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother
to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
You are stating an opinion that I formed a long time ago -- probably before he dropped his last name from his postings.
Alan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although he
has in others.
I was talking about Ron, not Alan.
Why would Ron's approach that is probably best be not talking to
himself?
Alan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although he
has in others.
I was talking about Ron, not Alan.
Why would Ron's approach that is probably best be not talking to himself?
heAlan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although
has in others.
I was talking about Ron, not Alan.
Why would Ron's approach that is probably best be not talking to
himself?
I read that as "don't even bother talking to him" meaning talking to
Ron. He rarely responds, and even if he does it is not responsive.
I read that as "don't even bother talking to him" meaning talking to
Ron. He rarely responds, and even if he does it is not responsive.
Mike Powell wrote to DALE SHIPP <=-
I read that as "don't even bother talking to him" meaning talking to
Ron. He rarely responds, and even if he does it is not responsive.
He usually responds to me, even if we don't always agree.
I don't respond to Dale because he has nothing worth reading.
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 253 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 02:41:28 |
Calls: | 1,647 |
Files: | 4,003 |
Messages: | 387,134 |