Also interesting is how releasing the identiy of the Biden informant
could endanger the life of the informant. Not so much that, but it makes
you wonder who the informant would be in life-threatening trouble from? I can only think of one family who'd benefit from his/her death.
Then again, that is the FBI's reasoning for not releasing a document to the committee in question. Could be because they just don't want to because it is incriminating for their Boss and themselves.
Also interesting is how releasing the identiy of the Biden informant
could endanger the life of the informant. Not so much that, but it makes you wonder who the informant would be in life-threatening trouble from? I can only think of one family who'd benefit from his/her death.
Then again, that is the FBI's reasoning for not releasing a document to the committee in question. Could be because they just don't want to because it is incriminating for their Boss and themselves.
The document is worthless.
The document is worthless.
We don't really know that yet because very few have seen it.
Unless Alan Ianson of British Columbia, Canada, was one of the few the US
FBI trusted with the info?
My real guess is that Alan says it is worthless because, if it is not, it could be real bad for the Bidens.
The official also admitted to the 278,000 illegal queries into US Citizens, which could be seen as 278,000 attempts at spying on the people. You
jumped right over that nugget.
The document is worthless.
We don't really know that yet because very few have seen it.
Unless Alan Ianson of British Columbia, Canada, was one of the few the US FBI trusted with the info?
This is not new. It's an old story, not evidence of anything.
My real guess is that Alan says it is worthless because, if it is not, it could be real bad for the Bidens.
I say it is worthless because it is garbage. It has no value. Not to me, not
you, not to anyone at all.
The official also admitted to the 278,000 illegal queries into US Citizens, which could be seen as 278,000 attempts at spying on the people. You
jumped right over that nugget.
I don't know what that nugget is, so I can't comment.
I don't know what that nugget is, so I can't comment.
It was in the congressional testimony video I linked to, which means you did not watch it and have no idea what we are even talking about. Yet, you know it is garbage with no knowledge of it.
I guess you are a psychic?
idI don't know what that nugget is, so I can't comment.
It was in the congressional testimony video I linked to, which means you
nownot watch it and have no idea what we are even talking about. Yet, you
it is garbage with no knowledge of it.
I guess you are a psychic?
No, I think you are simply trying to distract.
I don't watch FOX news. The link I provided was not from FOX
news. It was congressional testimony without any editorial commentary.
You chose not to watch it, so don't put your head in the sand then turn around and try to pass yourself off as having any knowledge of the subject at hand.
I chose not to watch or comment on your video.
So what?
No, I think you are simply trying to distract.
The FBI official that was being questioned admitted that the queries had happened.
The hearing was happening because the FBI wanted an extension of
a policy that apparently allows them to do more domestic surveilance.
The congressperson was arguing that they don't deserve such an extension because they made those 278,000 illegal inquiries and cannot be trusted
with more surveilance power.
I don't see a distraction. The FBI wanted something and were asking for
it, and were having a difficult time getting it because they abuse their power.
I don't watch FOX news. The link I provided was not from FOX
news. It was congressional testimony without any editorial commentary.
You chose not to watch it, so don't put your head in the sand then turn
around and try to pass yourself off as having any knowledge of the subject >> > at hand.
I chose not to watch or comment on your video.
So what?
You did comment, multiple times, saying it was garbage. You don't even
know because you "chose not to watch."
For all you know, it is someone discussing how much of a mental giant Alan Ianson is.
I never responded to your original statement about this. It sounds like more garbage and I won't respond about this anymore.
I never responded to your original statement about this. It sounds like
more garbage and I won't respond about this anymore.
You know what that is right, w/ not responding or pulling a disappearing act. Cowardice.
As more information is known about the Biden Bribes and other crimes,
I suspect you will want to Go Ahead and pull a Jeff.
The congressperson was arguing that they don't deserve such an extension because they made those 278,000 illegal inquiries and cannot be trusted with more surveilance power.
Yes, another GOP distraction.
I don't see a distraction. The FBI wanted something and were asking for it, and were having a difficult time getting it because they abuse their power.
I never responded to your original statement about this. It sounds like more
bage and I won't respond about this anymore.
Yes, another GOP distraction.
So, if you found out I made 278,000 illegal inquiries into a government computer system, you would think that was OK for me to be granted
surveilance powers, and that anyone who disagreed was creating a "distraction"?
I don't see a distraction. The FBI wanted something and were asking for >> > it, and were having a difficult time getting it because they abuse their >> > power.
I never responded to your original statement about this. It sounds like more
bage and I won't respond about this anymore.
But you DID. Otherwise, we'd not be having this assinine discussion now.
So, if you found out I made 278,000 illegal inquiries into a government computer system, you would think that was OK for me to be granted surveilance powers, and that anyone who disagreed was creating a "distraction"?
Not at all.
orI never responded to your original statement about this. It sounds like
bage and I won't respond about this anymore.
But you DID. Otherwise, we'd not be having this assinine discussion now.
You can keep talking about if you like but I will not respond.
Not at all.
But it is OK when the FBI does it?
You can keep talking about if you like but I will not respond.
The title of this thread is in regards to the 278,000 illegal inquiries.
It is the only thread with that title, and you didn't start the thread, so you must have *responded* to it. Otherwise, there would be no posts from
you on this thread.
Not only that, but you were the first to respond to the thread.
Mike Powell wrote to ALAN IANSON <=-
But it is OK when the FBI does it?
The title of this thread is in regards to the 278,000 illegal
inquiries. It is the only thread with that title, and you didn't start
the thread, so you must have *responded* to it. Otherwise, there would
be no posts from you on this thread.
Not only that, but you were the first to respond to the thread.
eThe title of this thread is in regards to the 278,000 illegal inquiries.
It is the only thread with that title, and you didn't start the thread, so you must have *responded* to it. Otherwise, there would be no posts from you on this thread.
It was a another distraction you presented that had nothing to do with what
ere talking about.
Not only that, but you were the first to respond to the thread.
I have already told you I would not respond, and I will not.
I am not saying you can't talk about it, I am saying I won't respond and I am jecting your narrative.
But it is OK when the FBI does it?
It's ok when HIS side does it.
Remember: Rules for thee, but not for me.
Not only that, but you were the first to respond to the thread.
Careful about posting facts that counter his beliefs. You might trigger him. 8)
I have already told you I would not respond, and I will not.
I am not saying you can't talk about it, I am saying I won't respond and I am >> jecting your narrative.
And yet you just did again.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
He reminds me of that poor horse on Animal Farm. Keeps going right
along with everything right up until after he's loaded into the glue factory truck. Even then, I don't think he understands that it is the
end for him.
He has claimed again that he won't respond (again!), but I know he
cannot let things go without feeling like he got the last word.
Remember: Rules for thee, but not for me.
I think you need to take your dementia meds, or get on some if you are not already on them.
But it is OK when the FBI does it?
It's ok when HIS side does it.
Remember: Rules for thee, but not for me.
I have no doubt there. He'd be screaming about it if Trump or some "MAGAs"
did it.
That's why I call those people "Ignorant Elitists".
He has claimed again that he won't respond (again!), but I know he cannot let things go without feeling like he got the last word.
Nope. Because he's right - no matter how much you prove him wrong.
He has claimed again that he won't respond (again!), but I know he
cannot let things go without feeling like he got the last word.
Nope. Because he's right - no matter how much you prove him wrong.
He just did it again. I am letting him have the last word. :D
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 253 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 13:48:25 |
Calls: | 1,646 |
Files: | 3,994 |
Messages: | 387,901 |