Mr. Wray is going to give the GOP the document that shows Biden taking bribes.
I think with Joe's last fall the left are going to sink him before the election.
Mr. Wray is going to give the GOP the document that shows Biden taking bribes.
That document contains info received by the FBI, but it is unsubstantiated.
I think with Joe's last fall the left are going to sink him before the election.
I don't think Joe is going to fall on account of unsubstantiated claims with no facts to back them up.
Why would it almost take a would it take charging him with contempt to get them. If they were baseless just say so...
show them the document... show the the work you did to substantiate them as being unsubstantiated... and move on.....
Now, they'll have the document(s). Now they'll ask what the FBI has done to investigate the allegations... They'll now be able to talk to witnesses ... they'll be able to see if the bank records correlate with the allegations
I know why they fought so hard to keep it from the public... There are only 2 CRIMES mentioned in the constitution ...."treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors"... Looks like Joe Briben might have got caught.
I think with Joe's last fall the left are going to sink him before the
election.
I don't think Joe is going to fall on account of unsubstantiated claims
with no facts to back them up.
It shows how weak and old he is, he won't win the election regardless of who he runs against. They're not going to snipe him like they did with JFK, but they'll feed him to the sharks and have him out some time soon.
I know why they fought so hard to keep it from the public...
There are only 2 CRIMES mentioned in the constitution ....
"treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors"...
Looks like Joe Briben might have got caught.
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
Why would it almost take a would it take charging him with contempt to get them. If they were baseless just say so... show them the
document... show them the work you did to substantiate them as being unsubstantiated... and move on.....
I know why they fought so hard to keep it from the public... There are only 2 CRIMES mentioned in the constitution ...."treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors"... Looks like Joe Briben might have got caught.
It shows how weak and old he is, he won't win the election regardless
of who he runs against. They're not going to snipe him like they did
with JFK, but they'll feed him to the sharks and have him out some time soon.
This is all about somewhow/anyhow making Joe look bad because of the upcoming election. It's election interference by the GOP.
I'm almost certain that congress knows full well how and why the FBI
works the way it does.
Hello Joe,
[..]
I know why they fought so hard to keep it from the public...
Do you, Joe? Do you really? Please tell us what you know, Joe ...
Treason. That's one.
Bribery. That's two.
He was sandbagged. Fell flat on his face as a result.
But he survived. Thanks to his training at Beach Delaware.
I'm almost certain that congress knows full well how and why the FBI
works the way it does.
FBI is crockeder than Hillary. This is the same FBI that investigated Trump, Crossfire Hurricane, with made up evidence....
The FBI is corrupt.
Anytime they stonewall or delay something like that, it's basically an admission that 1) yes, it's true and 2) they knew all about it.
I'll only celebrate when the Biden Crime Family is sent to prison -
along with the Clinton Crime Family.
FBI is crockeder than Hillary. This is the same FBI that investigated T Crossfire Hurricane, with made up evidence....
Does any of that surprise you?
The FBI is corrupt.
The FBI is doing their job, just as we expected they would and as they continue to do. It's a bold statement to say "The FBI is corrupt", but
are there any facts to back that up?
Crossfire Hurricane.. Durham report...
Crossfire Hurricane.. Durham report...
What about Crossfire Hurricane and the Durham report?
The Crossfire Hurricane investigation was opened due to George Papadopoulos's assertions of Russians having damaging material on
Hillary.
Trump wasn't under investigation until he fired James Comey and raised suspicions of obstruction of justice which then triggered the Mueller investigation.
The Durham report of course was just a flop.
Trump wasn't under investigation until he fired James Comey and raised suspicions of obstruction of justice which then triggered the Mueller investigation.What makes you believe that The President can not fire the FBI Director.
Trump wasn't under investigation until he fired James Comey and raised
suspicions of obstruction of justice which then triggered the Mueller
investigation.
What makes you believe that The President can not fire the FBI Director.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
If he doesn't step down, or they don't use amendment #25, they'll take
him down hard like they did JFK.
IHMO: we will wait Joe out and let his term expire at this point.
Not even the Ignorant Elitists want Kamala as President - which was Joe's "insurance policy" that he would not be pushed out.
I know they don't want Kamala to be the next...
BUT...
he could stroke out or make some more awesome speeches that make no sense.
The way things are now ANY republican runner can take him down in an election... even Chris Christie.
They'll take him out now, it could get messy, and be in control of who they
replace him with...
The Durham report of course was just a flop.
rump'Trump wasn't under investigation until he fired James Comey and raised suspicions of obstruction of justice which then triggered the Mueller investigation.What makes you believe that The President can not fire the FBI Director. Trump was the President and therefore Jim Comey served at the President
will. You really should of paid attention better in school within your
Social Studies class, when they were covering American Law.
The Durham report of course was just a flop.
"For years, Donald Trump and his supporters pinned their hopes on the investigation by [the special counsel] John Durham, Trump and his allies arguing it would exonerate him from any hint of improper behavior regarding the Russian government's attempts to interfere in the 2016 election.
The report is now here, it has dropped, and it might not have produced everything of what some Republicans hoped for, [but] it is regardless devastating to the FBI and to a degree, it does exonerate Donald Trump."
-- Jake Tapper, CNN <-- Not Fox or OAN or Newsmax
The FBI "failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law"
-- a quote from the Durham report
The FBI used the Steele dossier to secure FISA warrants without revealing
to the court that the primary source for the dossier was the subject of an unresolved FBI counterspy investigation for ties to Russian intelligence, i.e. Igor Danchenko. Part of the reason Danchenko was under investigation was that he asked a coworker, who he thought was about to join the Obama administration, if the coworker would be willing to divulge any classified information he might learn while with the administration in exchange for money.
Instead of completing that investigation, the FBI decided to hire Danchenko as a paid informant for the Trump investigation, gave Danchenko a letter of immunity, and would later claim that Danchenko was never under
investigation.
So the FBI was paying someone, who needed to save their own hide, to
provide information about Trump and Russia.
None of that was ever divulged to the court. Your definition of corrupt might be different than mine, but withholding information in order to
secure warrants is a corrupt action by my definition. As an aside, it is also corrupt by the definition of the investigation into the warrant that lead to the death of Briana Taylor in nearby Louisville, which involved police withholding key information when obtaining said warrant.
The whole Trump Russian collusion "fact" was nothing but a hoax and
left-wing conspiracy theory originated by the Clinton Campaign, the DNC,
and Russian disinformation (via Danchenko), and perpetuated by the FBI and people like Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and the American press.
rump'Trump wasn't under investigation until he fired James Comey and rai suspicions of obstruction of justice which then triggered the Muell investigation.What makes you believe that The President can not fire the FBI Director. Trump was the President and therefore Jim Comey served at the President
will. You really should of paid attention better in school within your Social Studies class, when they were covering American Law.
Alan likely went to school in Canada where they had no such lesson re: American Law.
"For years, Donald Trump and his supporters pinned their hopes on the investigation by [the special counsel] John Durham, Trump and his allies arguing it would exonerate him from any hint of improper behavior regarding the Russian government's attempts to interfere in the 2016 election.
The report is now here, it has dropped, and it might not have produced everything of what some Republicans hoped for, [but] it is regardless devastating to the FBI and to a degree, it does exonerate Donald Trump."
-- Jake Tapper, CNN <-- Not Fox or OAN or Newsmax
Yes, of course. Nevertheless, the Durham report is a flop.
Are you saying that Danchenko is the good guy and the FBI is the bad guy?
The whole Trump Russian collusion "fact" was nothing but a hoax and left-wing conspiracy theory originated by the Clinton Campaign, the DNC, and Russian disinformation (via Danchenko), and perpetuated by the FBI and people like Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and the American press.
Russian interference in the 2016 election is a well documented fact.
Trump didn't "do" that but used it to his advantage.
aTrump wasn't under investigation until he fired James Comey and
uelsuspicions of obstruction of justice which then triggered the
irectorinvestigation.What makes you believe that The President can not fire the FBI
residentTrump was the President and therefore Jim Comey served at the
rump'
will. You really should of paid attention better in school within your Social Studies class, when they were covering American Law.
Alan likely went to school in Canada where they had no such lesson re: American Law.
What do you mean?? Comey serves at the presidents pleasure... He was firedor
ood reason. The Deep State, Democrats and Left-Wingh Nut Jobs used hisismis
l as a segway to activate Mueller... and what did Muller find... nonvolvemen
if there was Trump would have been easily voted out of office.
Comey sat for an interview with MSNBC with Jen Nut Sacky, definitely a left
ning interview... BUT... Comey mentions that he is worried about retribution
his involvement in the Russia hoax.
Yes, of course. Nevertheless, the Durham report is a flop.
It might be a flop to you because it proved the FBI has issues and that
there is no evidence of collusion, which you've spent several years in here claiming there was.
Now, when compared to what Trump expected out of it, I would have to say on that scale it is also a flop.
But it did expose several issues, lapses of judgement, and lapses of
mission in the FBI.
Are you saying that Danchenko is the good guy and the FBI is the bad guy?
Nope, not even close. I was and am saying Danchenko was NOT the good guy the FBI made him out to be when requesting warrants, which makes them also not such good guys.
They were looking out for the political interests of the party that was in charge at the time of the 2016 election (the party of Obama, in case you cannot remember) and not the interests of the country as a whole.
Russian interference in the 2016 election is a well documented fact.
I said collusion was a hoax. Interference in US politics, in general, from Russian sources was aided by the FBI using a Russian informant they knew
was dirty and was apparently feeding them bad information in exchange for
an immunity letter.
Trump didn't "do" that but used it to his advantage.
So have the Democrats, thanks to the FBI, ever since.
It wasn't a flop but when you look online for the Durham Report you can easily see at a glance all of the left leaning websites, all trying to overly convince the reader that the Durham Report wasn't successful or that it was not effective. In truth it was very effective as it provided facts, which most of us on the right have speculated to be true for quite sometime now."For years, Donald Trump and his supporters pinned their hopes on the investigation by [the special counsel] John Durham, Trump and his allie
arguing it would exonerate him from any hint of improper behavior regar
the Russian government's attempts to interfere in the 2016 election. The report is now here, it has dropped, and it might not have produced everything of what some Republicans hoped for, [but] it is regardless devastating to the FBI and to a degree, it does exonerate Donald Trump.
-- Jake Tapper, CNN <-- Not Fox or OAN or Newsmax
Yes, of course. Nevertheless, the Durham report is a flop.
It might be a flop to you because it proved the FBI has issues and that there is no evidence of collusion, which you've spent several years in here claiming there was.
The Durham report was started, now completed.
Trump is completely exonerated, as per the report.
On 06-06-23 09:36, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Mike Powell about Re: FBI <=-
What do you mean?? Comey serves at the presidents
pleasure... He was fired for good reason. The Deep State,
Democrats and Left-Wingh Nut Jobs used his dismissal as a
segway to activate Mueller... and what did Muller find...
no involvement, if there was Trump would have been easily
voted out of office.
Mike Powell wrote to ALAN IANSON <=-
Yes, of course. Nevertheless, the Durham report is a flop.
It might be a flop to you because it proved the FBI has issues and that there is no evidence of collusion, which you've spent several years in here claiming there was.
his involvement in the Russia hoax.
If he is found culpable for some of the FBI misactions, maybe he should receive some legal retribution.
Trump is completely exonerated, as per the report.
Trump was not exonerated. He was acquitted by the Senate.
Impeached by the House. Twice. But never exonerated of anything.
exonerate - to declare or prove blameless
acquit - to clear a person of a charge
Please do note the difference.
What do you mean?? Comey serves at the presidents
pleasure... He was fired for good reason. The Deep State,
Democrats and Left-Wingh Nut Jobs used his dismissal as a
segway to activate Mueller... and what did Muller find...
no involvement, if there was Trump would have been easily
voted out of office.
Your statement is coming from the AG Barr's false synopsis of the
Mueller report. What the Mueller report said was that there was not enough evidence of conspiracy, that collsion is not a criminal term and
so no comment, that there was evidence of cooperation of the Trump campaign with the Russians, and that there is considerable evidence of criminal obstruction of justice by Trump -- but that DOJ policy
prohibits filing criminal charges against a sitting President.
The Director of the FBI serves a 10-year term, having been nominated
by the President and confirmed by the Senate, meaning that he/she does *not* serve at the POTUS pleasure.
I spent several years in here claiming there was?
It is the GOP who now (that Donald Trump is under investigation) want toefun
the FBI, not me.
I don't have any facts to that. I don't know that Durham's report did any ofh
t but if it did we can look at all that.
Are you saying that Danchenko is the good guy and the FBI is the bad guy?
Nope, not even close. I was and am saying Danchenko was NOT the good guy
FBI made him out to be when requesting warrants, which makes them also not such good guys.
They were looking out for the political interests of the party that was in charge at the time of the 2016 election (the party of Obama, in case you cannot remember) and not the interests of the country as a whole.
I don't see that. The FBI is not a political party.
vRussian interference in the 2016 election is a well documented fact.
I said collusion was a hoax. Interference in US politics, in general, from Russian sources was aided by the FBI using a Russian informant they knew was dirty and was apparently feeding them bad information in exchange for an immunity letter.
Trump didn't "do" that but used it to his advantage.
So have the Democrats, thanks to the FBI, ever since.
What exactly are you saying that the democrats have done, thanks to the FBI
since?
Topic: You twisted lefty spin.What do you mean?? Comey serves at the presidents
pleasure... He was fired for good reason. The Deep State,
Democrats and Left-Wingh Nut Jobs used his dismissal as a
segway to activate Mueller... and what did Muller find...
no involvement, if there was Trump would have been easily
voted out of office.
Your statement is coming from the AG Barr's false synopsis of the
Mueller report. What the Mueller report said was that there was not enough evidence of conspiracy, that collsion is not a criminal term and
so no comment, that there was evidence of cooperation of the Trump campaign with the Russians, and that there is considerable evidence of criminal obstruction of justice by Trump -- but that DOJ policy
prohibits filing criminal charges against a sitting President.
On 06-07-23 19:42, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: FBI <=-
Your statement is coming from the AG Barr's false synopsis of the
Mueller report. What the Mueller report said was that there was not enough evidence of conspiracy, that collsion is not a criminal term and
so no comment, that there was evidence of cooperation of the Trump campaign with the Russians, and that there is considerable evidence of criminal obstruction of justice by Trump -- but that DOJ policy
prohibits filing criminal charges against a sitting President.
Topic: You twisted lefty spin.
Source of Truth: The American Bar Association
Website: https://tinyurl.com/437tjaax
"The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the
election, but did NOT find that the Trump campaign, or anyone
associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian
government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump
campaign."
You're so quick with the pointed finger, and you want so
badly to score a impressive home-run as to gracefully take
your victory lap but your missing the point in all of this.
"As far as obstruction, the Mueller report laid out facts
on both sides but did not reach a conclusion. Barr's letter
said that the Special Counsel states that while this report
does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it
also does not exonerate him."
This is NOT where this story ends. There is more to understand, so sit down..
"But Barr said that he and Rosenstein "have concluded that the
evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."
I do not see at all how this could remotely be a
possibility if it has already been established that neither
the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired
or coordinated with the Russian government.
Just as pissing up a robe is unsuccessful, so is this liberal
narrative of yours.
Trump is completely exonerated, as per the report.
Trump was not exonerated. He was acquitted by the Senate.
Impeached by the House. Twice. But never exonerated of anything.
exonerate - to declare or prove blameless
acquit - to clear a person of a charge
Please do note the difference.
He was impeached twice and found not guilty twice...
NOTE the difference.
Had he been found guilty he would not be able to run today...
Now we have MAGA 2.0
The Director of the FBI serves a 10-year term, having been nominated
by the President and confirmed by the Senate, meaning that he/she does
*not* serve at the POTUS pleasure.
Not true
One of Regan FBI directors was fired... So, Comey was the 2nd to be fired.
If you spent 2 seconds on Google you would find out that he can...
Google is a search engine, having no authority whatsoever.
Trump was never shown to be blameless. Just because not enough
Senators voted to remove him from office does not clear his name.
In fact, no defense at all was made on his behalf during the
second trial. What a sad commentary on your beloved Republican
Party, every member knowing he was guilty as sin.
"The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but did NOT find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspiredf
coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple
rts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign."
I do not see at all how this could remotely be a
possibility if it has already been established that neither
the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired
or coordinated with the Russian government.
No one has said that there was conspiracy or coordination.
Google is a search engine, having no authority whatsoever.
I didn't say it was an authority...
BUT it did show that Comey was the second FBI directory to be fired by a president.
And we learned by his own admission and the Durham report that he was directly involved in Russia collusion scam.
He was the one that said in a recent interview with Jen Nutt Scaky that he is worried that Trump will hold them all accountable.
I stated the facts, not liberal nor conservative. You are the oneI am not buying your innocent elixir, or that I am trying to create any such argument. The entirety of lets get Trump on charges is wrong.
trying to create an argument against a narrative that was never stated.
Trump was never shown to be blameless. Just because not enough
Senators voted to remove him from office does not clear his name.
In fact, no defense at all was made on his behalf during the
second trial. What a sad commentary on your beloved Republican
Party, every member knowing he was guilty as sin.
"At the trial, 57 senators voted "guilty", which was less than the two-thirds majority needed (67) to convict Trump, and 43 senators voted "not guilty", resulting in Trump being acquitted of the charges on February
13, 2021.[15]"
Above snippet from WikipediA...
Maybe the facts didn't support the democrats claims...
They presented the evidence and it wasn't enough to convict...
or whatever it was they were trying to do.
Impeach, try to remove someone from office that was no longer in office...
some thing's up...
Now the video tapes, as well as some testimony has been released showing the
powers-to-be more culpable than they claimed Trump ever was... Civil suites
are being filed on the January 6th comity ... the truth always seems to find it's way out.
I do not see at all how this could remotely be a
possibility if it has already been established that neither
the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired
or coordinated with the Russian government.
No one has said that there was conspiracy or coordination.
Maybe you did not, but I know we had at least two regular posters... one who is still posting and one that has disappeared... who claimed that Russian collusion with the Trump campaign was fact.
IIRC, both Adam Schiff (many times) and Nancy Pelosi (at least once) also claimed it was fact.
BUT it did show that Comey was the second FBI directory to be fired b president.
Google is also not a source. For anything. It is just a search
engine. It does exactly what it was designed to do. It searches.
Who is going to hold Trump accountable for his pardon of Paul
Manafort? Certainly not Vladimir Putin and his pals ...
"At the trial, 57 senators voted "guilty", which was less than the two-thirds majority needed (67) to convict Trump, and 43 senators vot "not guilty", resulting in Trump being acquitted of the charges on February
13, 2021.[15]"
It takes two-thirds of those voting to remove a president from
office. Not two-thirds of the entire membership of the Senate.
That is why none of the "crimes" the House had charged him with
mattered. The only question on the ballot was should the bastard
be removed from office? If two-thirds of those voting had said
"yes" it would have been "Bye-Bye".
On 06-08-23 18:40, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: FBI <=-
I do not see at all how this could remotely be a
possibility if it has already been established that neither
the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired
or coordinated with the Russian government.
No one has said that there was conspiracy or coordination.
Maybe you did not, but I know we had at least two regular posters...
one who is still posting and one that has disappeared... who claimed
that Russian collusion with the Trump campaign was fact.
IIRC, both Adam Schiff (many times) and Nancy Pelosi (at least once)
also claimed it was fact.
On 06-09-23 07:51, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: FBI <=-
I stated the facts, not liberal nor conservative. You are the one
trying to create an argument against a narrative that was never stated.
I am not buying your innocent elixir, or that I am trying
to create any such argument.
The entirety of lets get Trump on charges is wrong.
fired bBUT it did show that Comey was the second FBI directory to be
president.
Google is also not a source. For anything. It is just a search
engine. It does exactly what it was designed to do. It searches.
Right, it's not an authority... I used it to search... and I found articles... more than one... that said that Comey wasn't the first FBI director fired from a President, and he shouldn't be the last... I think Wray should be fired for what he's doing.
Google did not act as an authority ... but it did show me some articles that
showed me you were WRONG!!!
IB Joe wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
Google did not act as an authority ... but it did show me some articles that showed me you were WRONG!!!
IB Joe wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
Google did not act as an authority ... but it did show me some articl that showed me you were WRONG!!!
Uh, oh. Lee just got triggered. Nothing infuriates an Ignorant
Elistist as being shown to be wrong.
Google did not act as an authority ... but it did show me some articles that showed me you were WRONG!!!
Uh, oh. Lee just got triggered. Nothing infuriates an Ignorant Elistist as being shown to be wrong.
On 06-09-23 07:51, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: FBI <=-
I stated the facts, not liberal nor conservative. You are the one trying to create an argument against a narrative that was never stated
I am not buying your innocent elixir, or that I am trying
to create any such argument.
The entirety of lets get Trump on charges is wrong.
It is not "lets [sic] get Trump on charges", it is "let's charge and convict those who violate the law".
On 06-11-23 11:25, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: FBI <=-
I stated the facts, not liberal nor conservative. You are the one
trying to create an argument against a narrative
that was never stated
I am not buying your innocent elixir, or that I am trying
to create any such argument.
The entirety of lets get Trump on charges is wrong.
It is not "lets [sic] get Trump on charges", it is "let's charge and convict those who violate the law".
Shouldn't the law apply to everyone equally?
Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 emails from her private
server that was in a broom closet (that she was not
authorized to have in the first place.)
She smashed up blackberries with a hammer, wiped servers clean
(and no not with a cloth or something.)
Using Bleach-bit which is a very expensive process.
Remember what is was that James Comey said?
"No reasonable prosecutor would bring this case."
Sleepy Uncle Joe Biden
Biden had 1850 boxes of classified documents that were
sprawled across numerous states.
Chinatown Washington, D.C.
https://tinyurl.com/2whka6b5
There seems to be a convincing and quite an alarming
Chinese Communist Party connection.
More on this this "Made Man" Antony (wink-wink) Blinken.
URL: https://tinyurl.com/bdd2hzka
want more proof: https://tinyurl.com/2p9c6p8v
Consideration of the above it is now coming into crystal
clear focus as to why Merrit-LESS Garland is going after
Trump.
Garland and many Democrats, in their quest to hold Donald Trump accountable under federal statutes relating to record retention and classified information, are operating under the premise
that Trump can be treated like any other government
employee someone who can be caught up in a legalistic
debate about the possession of documents that are arguably
classified, and their responsibilities associated with
such.
But that's just not the case.
Even if Trump did have documents that were once classified
containing information critical to the nation's security,
documents that he did not readily return to the National
Archives or the DOJ, he may well have violated no criminal
statute.
The President of the United States has unlimited access to all
classified information. Any other government employee who accesses secret or top-secret information must possess the proper
security clearance to do so, which typically entails their
undergoing detailed background checks, polygraphs, and
continuing responsibilities to report any information that
could impact their trustworthiness such as arrests, foreign
contacts, and the like.
But U.S. presidents do not possess any security clearance at all. To
the contrary, the president is the [classification authority]
with the power to determine who can access classified
information, who can be granted security clearances (or
have theirs revoked), and even to determine what is
considered classified in the first place. The president
possesses this power because he is entrusted, among other
things, with both the command of our military forces and
the international relations that we have with other
countries, functions that
obviously require access to information of the highest sensitivity.
A government watchdog is demanding the US attorney probing Hunter Biden inel
are investigate tens of millions in anonymous donations from China to theniv
sity of Pennsylvania, where an academic center is named for his father,resid
t Biden.un
The Ivy League college raked in a total of $54.6 million from 2014 through
2019 in donations from China, including $23.1 million in anonymous giftstart
g in 2016, according to public records.
I read an article the other day... GWP... The FBI posted on Twitter that they
wanted the public to report crimes if they were aware of any being committed.. >HAHAHAHAHA... apparently they were overwhelmed by people reporting crimes they
have committed.... as well as the Biden family and portions of the government....AKA the Deep State!!!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/victor-reacts-fbi-overwhelmed-reports
their-own-crimes/
Wikipedia has this to say about The Gateway Pundit..
The Gateway Pundit is an American far-righ fake news website. The
website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.
Wikipedia has this to say about The Gateway Pundit..
The Gateway Pundit is an American far-righ fake news website. The
website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy
theories.
Wikipedia is a far-left, liberal website, with ties to big tech. They changed the definition of "vaccine" after the Democrat-developed virus was released.
They suppress conservative ideas in favor of leftist narratives.
All media outlets are known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories. Try to name one news outlet that hasn't been guilty of selling fake news.
Wikipedia is a far-left, liberal website, with ties to big tech. They changed the definition of "vaccine" after the Democrat-developed virus
was released.
I read an article the other day... GWP... The FBI posted on Twitter that
they
wanted the public to report crimes if they were aware of any being
committed..
HAHAHAHAHA... apparently they were overwhelmed by people reporting crimes
they
have committed.... as well as the Biden family and portions of the
government....AKA the Deep State!!!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/victor-reacts-fbi-overwhelmed-reports
their-own-crimes/
Wikipedia has this to say about The Gateway Pundit..
The Gateway Pundit is an American far-righ fake news website. The website is
known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.
So why do you follow and publish this kind of nonsense?
Wikipedia has this to say about The Gateway Pundit..
The Gateway Pundit is an American far-righ fake news website. The
website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy
theories.
Wikipedia is a far-left, liberal website, with ties to big tech. They changed the definition of "vaccine" after the Democrat-developed
virus was released.
They suppress conservative ideas in favor of leftist narratives.
All media outlets are known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.
Try to name one news outlet that hasn't been guilty of selling fake
news.
Wikipedia is a far-left, liberal website, with ties to big tech. They AI> > ch
the definition of "vaccine" after the Democrat-developed virus was AI> > relea
Wikipedia is neither left or right and they don't define anything.
they also have all sorts of meta articles about handling your feelings when people make edits to wiki pages you don't like or don't follow the rules.
imagine having an echo where we exchanged tips about how not to let
posts in political echos hurt our feelings..
Wikipedia is a far-left, liberal website, with ties to big tech. LL> AT> LL> AT> They
changed the definition of "vaccine" after the Democrat-developed virus was released.
Despite your dislike for Wikipedia, how does that change the fact
about Alan's claim about The Gateway Pundit being "an American
far-right fake news website that is known for pulishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories"?
Wikipedia is a far-left, liberal website, with ties to big tech. They changed e definition of "vaccine" after the Democrat-developed virus was released.
Wikipedia has this to say about The Gateway Pundit..
The Gateway Pundit is an American far-righ fake news website. The
website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy
theories.
That's just bullshit.
imagine having an echo where we exchanged tips about how not to let
posts in political echos hurt our feelings..
Wikipedia has this to say about The Gateway Pundit..
The Gateway Pundit is an American far-righ fake news website. The
website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.
So why do you follow and publish this kind of nonsense?
I know for fact that, although Al used Wikipedia as his source here, if you use it to prove Al is wrong he won't buy what is said there, either.
The Gateway Pundit is an American far-righ fake news website. The
website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy
theories.
So why do you follow and publish this kind of nonsense?
Well, I don't put much credence to Wikipedia much... and the GWP happens to be ranked #1 in online news source... I go to other places as well...
Wikipedia is a far-left, liberal website, with ties to big tech.
changed the definition of "vaccine" after the Democrat-developedThey
virus was released.
Despite your dislike for Wikipedia, how does that change the fact
about Alan's claim about The Gateway Pundit being "an American
far-right fake news website that is known for pulishing falsehoods,
hoaxes, and conspiracy theories"?
I've never even heard of The Gateway Pundit.
Only leftist lunatics know about it,
because it (probably) propagates the idea that "conservatives
dumb, and they believe stupid things."
But you and I both know that all media outlets are full of it.
You were just agreeing with me on that 2 quarts ago.
Only leftist lunatics know about it,
You said "all media outlets" - barring none. I reckon that
includes Fox Propaganda channel? My, my ...
Aaron Thomas wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
Fox News is near the top of the list of fake news. They're
propagandists.
Currently, they want everyone to be scared of AI so that
the Democrats can pass a bill relating to it.
Should of been here back in 2016 before the election, when there was a whole
of Donald Trump will never be President, that was fun.
I heard about the crying rooms at liberal universities w/ coloring books and hot chocolate as well to help them cope w/ reality that Trump was the President.Should of been here back in 2016 before the election, when there was a wh
of Donald Trump will never be President, that was fun.
And then, when he was elected, most of them switched to "he isn't my President."
"and the GWP happens to be ranked #1 in online news source..."
Where did you see that?
The gateway pundit is just another disinformation machine.
The gateway pundit is just another disinformation machine.
I think Wikipedia... I did NOT ask you top read their opinion... I said watch
the video at the end where you can see a man talking and answering with his ow >words expressing his own opinion ... You didn't have to take GWP opinion on th
man speaking... look at the video and form your own.
Currently, they want everyone to be scared of AI so that
the Democrats can pass a bill relating to it.
Which would be the standard play.
1. Demonize something.
2. Wait for their minions to yell that the gov't needs to "do something". 3. Pass yet another unconstitutional law that gives them more power.
I'll take a few minutes to read/understand your views whether I agree or not but I am not a follower of TGP because it is a well known garbage dump.
I'll take a few minutes to read/understand your views whether I agree or
not but I am not a follower of TGP because it is a well known garbage
dump.
It's not well known for that..
Anyway, baby steps....
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Biden might get re-elected for saving America from the "dangers of AI" just like how he "saved us all from the dangers of white supremacists."
oAnd then, when he was elected, most of them switched to "he isn't my President."I heard about the crying rooms at liberal universities w/ coloring books and
chocolate as well to help them cope w/ reality that Trump was the President.
It is part of the right wing disinformation machine.
It is part of the right wing disinformation machine.
And you're too busy with the left wing disinformation machines to need any competition....
I understand
But I can see the gov't requiring their approval for putting some sort
of AI in your product.
Remember: The goal here is control. The Elitists get to decide the winners and losers. And you can bet that a plebe won't be a winner.
And you're too busy with the left wing disinformation machines to need a competition....
What disinformation is that? Talk of whistleblowers?
What disinformation is that? Talk of whistleblowers?
Rachel Maddow, Joy Ried, CNN, MSNBC and the like!!! I'm glad you brought whistleblowers in.... Like the ones from the FBI, IRS and other facets of the government that are testifying against the Biden Crime family.
Rachel Maddow and Joy Ried are not whistleblowers.
Rachel Maddow and Joy Ried are not whistleblowers.
Conspiracy Theorists
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
Rachel Maddow and Joy Ried are not whistleblowers.
Conspiracy Theorists
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
Rachel Maddow and Joy Ried are not whistleblowers.
Conspiracy Theorists
No. Propagandists.
| Sysop: | deepend |
|---|---|
| Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
| Users: | 253 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 14:04:06 |
| Calls: | 1,646 |
| Files: | 3,994 |
| Messages: | 387,903 |