You may want to grab a bottle of Aquavit and may I recommend straw.
It's 306 pages long.
Why ask if I have read it, when you have the opportunity to do so?You may want to grab a bottle of Aquavit and may I recommend straw. It's 306 pages long.
Oh, I've read it. Personally. My question to you Trump fanatics was:
"Have you?"
And the answer still seems to be:
Why ask if I have read it, when you have the opportunity to do so?
The weekend is approaching, I do plan on reading the Durham Report this weekend.
Why ask if I have read it, when you have the opportunity to do so?
I wasn't the one with the outlandish claim that Trump was right. Or the claims that you made.
The weekend is approaching, I do plan on reading the Durham Report this
weekend.
I told y'all so. Haven't read it, only parroted someone else's claim.
You may want to grab a bottle of Aquavit and may I recommend straw.
It's 306 pages long.
Oh, I've read it. Personally. My question to you Trump fanatics was:
"Have you?"
And the answer still seems to be:
"No, but I've had it explained to me by an expert on TRUTH Social."
Oh, I've read it. Personally. My question to you Trump fanatics was:
"Have you?"
He said he's getting around to it. This weekend. If he has time.
Oh, I've read it. Personally. My question to you Trump fanatics was:
"Have you?"
He said he's getting around to it. This weekend. If he has time.
If he even understands what he is reading.
Remember: most people look up to people that are smarter then they.
Can you imagine a nincompoop like Trump trying to understand any document at
all?
Well, and then imagine all those millions of worshippers, that obviously are
even less smart. Holy Cow!
Now you have a Putin style society served on a platter.
Tribute to Fox News, and its transformation of the US media. And the GOP and
its decades long transformation of the US educational system.
Remember: most people look up to people that are smarter then they.
Please. Tell me who Donald Trump looks up to.
I wasn't the one with the outlandish claim that Trump was right. OrIt's not outlandish if believe in a man who was speaking the truth all along. That's the very point of the Durham Report, it's a big fat I Told You So.
the claims that you made.
I told y'all so. Haven't read it, only parroted someone else's claim.Let's say I did take the time to read this massive document of 306 pages.
It's not outlandish if believe in a man who was speaking the truth all along.
That's the very point of the Durham Report, it's a big fat I Told
You So.
I told y'all so. Haven't read it, only parroted someone else's claim.
Let's say I did take the time to read this massive document of 306 pages.
What would be lesson? Would it be that I was truthful, honest and quite accurate in my previous posts here within the Politics echo in Fidonet?
If that is the case then naturally by default the reverse would also be true that you and all the rest of you liberal nut-cases are quite quantified and certified as delusional.
Remember: most people look up to people that are smarter then they.
Please. Tell me who Donald Trump looks up to.
That's easy, he's told us over and over again: Putin, Xi and Jong-un (whom he loves).
All three of them plays him like a fiddle, while laughing behind his back.
And, yet again, you have not even read the report! So how are you
able to "big fat tell" anyone? Do you really not see how totally
illogical that is?
LOL! Typical megalomaniac reaction. You are superior to the rest ofThat is illogical and unwise to fact check me. I am already on top of the mountain, from my vantage point I've had a President in Mr. Trump that raised everyone up, Blacks, Asians, Hispanics and all Americans, the real truth is that he was and currently still is far superior to Joe Biden.
us, so if we fact check you, we are nothing but Euro Trash Pacifist Shit Pig Pussies (actual quote from another superior guy), right?
Compute thisIf that is the case then naturally by default the reverse would also b
true that you and all the rest of you liberal nut-cases are quite quantified and certified as delusional.
BEEP! BEEP! BEEP! ERROR: Severe logical error, please recompute, with reliable input data.
I wasn't the one with the outlandish claim that Trump was right. BF>Orthe claims that you made.
It's not outlandish if believe in a man who was speaking the truth all along. That's the very point of the Durham Report, it's a big fat I Told You So.
The same is of course true with this statement.
Just as I do not need to be present to see a Rotten Dead Tree fall, to know
that it has in fact fallen.
I told y'all so. Haven't read it, only parroted someone else's BF>claim.
Let's say I did take the time to read this massive document of 306 pages. What would be lesson?
Would it be that I was truthful, honest and quite accurate in my previous posts here within the Politics echo in Fidonet?
If that is the case then naturally by default the reverse would also be true
that you and all the rest of you liberal nut-cases are quite quantified and
certified as delusional.
And, yet again, you have not even read the report! So how are you
able to "big fat tell" anyone? Do you really not see how totally
illogical that is?
Do you question the reports as well as the statements made from the liberal
media (better known as lies) when it comes to Donald Trump?
I think not, why should I do any different.
You're acting like you have Royal Flush when you have nothing,
Fold Now. Before I eat your lunch.
LOL! Typical megalomaniac reaction. You are superior to the BF>rest ofus, so if we fact check you, we are nothing but Euro BF>Trash Pacifist Shit
Pig Pussies (actual quote from another BF>superior guy), right?
That is illogical and unwise to fact check me.
I am already on top of the mountain, from my vantage point I've had a President in Mr. Trump that raised everyone up, Blacks, Asians, Hispanics and all Americans, the real truth is that he was and currently still is far
superior to Joe Biden.
Hillary Clinton is still standing, alive and well. So is Bill.
Hunter Biden is still standing, alive and well. So is Joe.
We only have one elected president at a time. The current elected president is Joe Biden, who beat the pants off the other guy by overOther then winning with these numbers.
seven million popular votes, and with a huge majority of electoral
college votes. Certified by the Congress to make it official.
On 05-22-23 21:05, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Durham Report explain <=-
Go ahead I am offering you a big opportunity here and now.
What has Joe Biden done that is positive.
Get your popcorn now, as this should prove to be interesting.
Has Biden Unite All Americans like he said he would?
Biden stopped nearly completely all the drilling for oil
only to beg like for dog, to foreign lands for energy.
Inflation continues to rise, and not rise but sky-rocket.
Speaking of the sky and for that matter rockets, Biden let
a Chinese Spy Balloon traverse across the United States
that appeared up largely in the news over Montana and then
it was it was not shot down until South Carolina.
What has Joe Biden done that is positive.
What has Joe Biden done that is positive.
What has he done that is *not* positive?
Biden did *not* lead an attempted coup.
Biden did *not* call dead soldiers 'losers'.
Biden was *not* found liable for sexual abuse.
Biden was *not* credibly accused of rape and sexual harassment by 26 women.
Biden did *not* add $7.8 to the debt.
Biden did *not* say 'There are good people on both sides' in Charlottesville.
Biden was *not* responsible for 1,000,000 Covid deaths.
Biden did *not* call for the termination of the Constitution.
Biden has *not* repeatedly praised Putin.
Biden did *not* tell 30,000 lies or falsehoods while in office.
I never called for anybody to lock her up (Hillary Clinton).
I never called for anybody to lock him up (Hunter Biden).
I never called for anybody to lock 'em all up (Republicans'
perceived enemies). Neither has Björn or any other "liberal"
that I know of. Both in and outside of this echo.
Please. Tell me what charges were filed by the special counsel.
Can't think of any? Neither can I (or anybody else).
And there won't be during this administration, DOJ is corrupt.
Given what we know Hillary et al. should be on trial, just with the stuff that was made public.
We should also find out why the Clinton Foundation investigation was
dropped, if it was dropped inappropriately, reinstate it.
We should have an honest review of Hunter's laptop and earnest credit to the whistle blowers in the FBI and IRS that have evidence of malfeasances they say they have on the Biden family.
We heard whistle blowers on a perfect and beautiful conversation Trump had with a sketchy world leader who NOW receives billions of dollars in tax
payer money...
Where, now, president son was taking MILLIONS of dollars for something he wasn't qualified to do.
I think every elected official should be investigated for insider trading, whatever party, and explain their shady transaction ... Mrs. Pelosi, worst offender.... Every-single-one of those little bitches should be exposed and shown as the frauds they are.
If the US survives this presidency first term, with the constitution intact,
we should gut these agencies that are not in the constitution... CIA, FBI, NSA, IRS... The EPA... the list goes on and on. Find out a way to have
them work for the people and in no way for political purposes.
Interesting fact, I don't have the exact numbers in front of me... in 2022 (I think)... congress passed some 130 new laws, it was more than 130 but less that 135. BUT... the unelected 4rth branch of government, AKA The Deep State, passed over 3000, this was done in regulations...., Interesting...
This 4rth unconstitutional branch of government is more powerful than the 3 constitutional branches combined.
Lets pray we survive ...
And there won't be during this administration, DOJ is corrupt.
That's a bold statement. Based on what?
The DOJ has not acted badly at all.
Hillary was investigated inside out and no charges were made.
If there ever was anything on Hunter's laptop it is lost because of the chain of custody.
Beautiful conversation? It was extortion. That world leader does not recieve any taxpayer money.
President son didn't take anything. He was paid for his time/service.
The US is doing well and the constitution holds.
Gut the CIA, FBI, NSA, the EPA? Why? Because Donald Trump is being investigated for his crimes?
There is no deep state. That's just a QAnon conspiracy theory.
As far as laws and regulations that's just normal. Laws and regulations are meant to make things better for everyone.
Remember all that talk about the "crime of the century" that Durham was going to investigate?
The DOJ has not acted badly at all.
Yes it has... It was part of the group who acted and knew about the Russia Hokes.
It was part of the group who acted in and knew about Hunter's laptop.
They are the same group who acted and knew about the IRS/FBI knowledge of Joe Biden taking bribes while he was a VP. Unless deep state gets tired of Joe... he'll float through this... If they do... the leaks will start and his end will come swift.
Hillary was investigated inside out and no charges were made.
Hillary was not fully investigated... investigation dropped... Current GOP is pushing the FBI to expand on this...
If there ever was anything on Hunter's laptop it is lost because of the
chain of custody.
There are ways to authenticate things.... HAHAHA...
they even have one of the prostitutes coming in to testify.
Apparently with her testimony and bank records they can prove Joe paid her $30,000.00 to have sex with his son...
and there are photos to prove it. It's also easy to authenticate the emails and whatnot... electronic finger prints on the emails and they can just talk to the recipients and ask them if they received that email from hunter.
Beautiful conversation? It was extortion. That world leader does not
recieve any taxpayer money.
It was a beautiful conversation... I read the transcript..
If you're going to send billions of dollars to a world leader why not ask a few questions.
Trump sent the money on time, no restrictions, and was found innocent of all wrong doings.
President son didn't take anything. He was paid for his time/service.
Funny, what was his expertise... Hunter said in an interview that he had no clue about the oil and gas industry, or anything about Ukraine... or did he even speak the language... He was just paid millions and owed the big guy 10%
The US is doing well and the constitution holds.
The US is not doing well...
Major recession, possible depression, is not too far away.
Gut the CIA, FBI, NSA, the EPA? Why? Because Donald Trump is being
investigated for his crimes?
No, not because they are investigating The Donald... All are unconstitutional
and all are working in someway to undermined the citizens in someway. We need to get back to our roots... Small federal government where
the states have more power and more rights than the feds do.
There is no deep state. That's just a QAnon conspiracy theory.
There is a deep state... those are the ones sooooooooo worried about Trump getting in and exposing them even more than he already has.
As far as laws and regulations that's just normal. Laws and regulations
are meant to make things better for everyone.
That may be "normal" to you... but having the deep state regulate their way of thinking and forcing people act in accordance is unconstitutional
Article 1 Section 1., All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and
House of Representatives.
Nowhere does it say pull new laws out of your ass with unelected officials.
Remember all that talk about the "crime of the century" that Durham was
going to investigate?
Durham pointed things out... let congress take things from there.
Once they get rid of the partisan DOJ... let the evidence go where it takes it and throw some of these real scum bags to jail
Biden did *not* lead an attempted coup.
Biden did *not* call dead soldiers 'losers'.
Biden was *not* found liable for sexual abuse.
Biden was *not* credibly accused of rape and sexual harassment by 26
women.
Biden did *not* add $7.8T to the debt.
Biden did *not* say 'There are good people on both sides' in
Charlottesville.
Biden was *not* responsible for 1,000,000 Covid deaths.
Biden did *not* call for the termination of the Constitution.
Biden has *not* repeatedly praised Putin.
Biden did *not* tell 30,000 lies or falsehoods while in office.
Many of these if not every single one of them are baseless statements, without facts to support these as true.
Durham pointed things out... let congress take things from there.
The Durham report pointed what out?
It was not a hoax. The Mueller report did not charge Donald Trump with anything, it was never going to. It didn't exonerate him either.
https://youtu.be/HMp9_f-jxDw
They are the same group who acted and knew about the IRS/FBI knowledge o Biden taking bribes while he was a VP. Unless deep state gets tired of Joe... he'll float through this... If they do... the leaks will start an end will come swift.
That is a lie.
There is nothing to expand on. Hillary was investigated and no charges were made.
A protitude is coming in to testify? ;)
Passed a large bi-partisan infrastructure bill.
Passed another bill that will do much for the economy, for the
environment, and also more infrastructure.
Was that the drilling in places where permits should never have been
issued, perhaps because of severe damage to the economy.
Inflation continues to rise, and not rise but sky-rocket.
Inflation rate has declined.
Unemployment rate is lower than it has been for half a century.
Tell us why it was not shot down over mid-America? What might have been
the result?
I did not say Mueller ... The Durham report, just released, said Trump had nothing to do with Russia...
It claims the whole thing was setup by Hillary, and perpetuated by the FBI, CIA, media and the power structure of the government.
I watched Mueller testify and he has about the same amount of
Alzheimer's as Joe has...
They are the same group who acted and knew about the IRS/FBI knowledge o >> > Biden taking bribes while he was a VP. Unless deep state gets tired of
Joe... he'll float through this... If they do... the leaks will start an >> > end will come swift.
That is a lie.
This is not a lie... they are currently trying to investigate this now... FBI whistle blowers gave document numbers to the GOP house investigators... FBI said they had those documents but aren't releasing them.
DOJ should be the ones to in force the document request... but they are part of the problem.
There is nothing to expand on. Hillary was investigated and no charges
were made.
Do you not watch the news?? It's been shown that Hillary's investigation was dropped suddenly without being completed. GOP are saying they'll cut the FBI' funding if they can't explain this...
A protitude is coming in to testify? ;)
MTG, says this lady is coming in to give sworn testimony... and has a bank account transfer of $30,000.00 from Joe Biden. Apparently she's seen the smoking gun.
I know that I'm a bit of a news hound.... Things are happening... you have to be not looking at things purposefully in order to see what you want to see.
On 05-23-23 15:37, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Durham Report explai <=-
Was that the drilling in places where permits should never have been
issued, perhaps because of severe damage to the economy.
Damage whose economy? The OPEC countries? Venezuela? China?
Certainly not ours.
Inflation continues to rise, and not rise but sky-rocket.
Inflation rate has declined.
Unemployment rate is lower than it has been for half a century.
People who get so discouraged they stop looking for work stop counting
as unemployed.
Tell us why it was not shot down over mid-America? What might have been
the result?
Do you mean once they waited until it was over populated mid-America,
or do you mean if they'd done it while it was over areas that are
barely populated?
On 05-23-23 15:37, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Alan Ianson about Re: Durham Report explain <=-
The US is doing well and the constitution holds.
On the news this morning, they mentioned that US business are going bankrupt at rate not seen since the 2008 Recession, and that market analysts expect business to continue to do so, pushing the rate beyond that seen in 2008.
News in this case = local and not FOX or any other news channel.
I would not call that doing well.
I did not say Mueller ... The Durham report, just released, said Trump h nothing to do with Russia...
Is that what it says?
No, that was the claim that Durham was charged with investigating.
After all those years at the conclusion there are still no charges.
I don't know Meuller aside from the fact that his report does not exonerate Donald Trump.
What "document" is requested?
MTG says there is a prostitute is coming in to give sworn testimony?
Durham started his investigation to show the origins of the Russia Hokes... and they found that Trump had no connection to Russia as it was presented in the 2016 election and 2020 not so. Durham found that
Hillary made up a story of Trump's connection to Russia. She in turn
used the FBI, CIA and the like to perpetuate this lie. FBI & CIA sold this to a willing media who never spent any time vetting the stories.
The report showed that Obama and Biden had been briefed on what Hillary was up to, yet said nothing....
So, you too obviously have *not* read the report. Just more hearsay. Why do y'all keep doing this, when it's so obvious for anyone that *has* read the report?
I have
and all the major news outlets here are reporting all the things
I have spoken about thus far.... Moreover I follow a few legal channels
on Youtube that have broken it down in the same manner that it's being reported, no one thus far is deviating from what is being reported...
except you... Funny...
The WH press secretary runs away when asked a
question on the Durham report...
if there was a leg to stand on or an
argument to make she would have made it already.
if there was a leg to stand on or an
argument to make she would have made it already.
Why? How is it her job to debunk all the crazy talk, based on hearsay?
I don't know Meuller aside from the fact that his report does not
exonerate Donald Trump.
Why do you keep bringing up Meuller... Knowing what we know from the Durham report Meuller should not have even investigated anything. Durham concluded it was all lies and it was Durham that concluded Trump had nothing to do with it.
What "document" is requested?
There are some documents, apparently not classified, that shows, and proves, that Joe Biden has been bribed from other countries and foreign players. The
GOP requested these documents, constitutionally they have oversight authority, >the FBI snubbed them with a 6 page letter. This may end up in court... But th
GOP lead House may restrict the FBI's funding if they don't produce said documents.
This is currently in the NEWS....
MTG says there is a prostitute is coming in to give sworn testimony?
Yes, she's part of the committee looking into the Biden IRS mess. The GOP was
given financial information on the Biden's a few months back, these were the ones that the Feds flagged as suspicious, I think 150 transaction in total. During the preliminary part of the investigation it was found at least
$10,000,000.00 from adversarial countries were paid out to the 9 Bidens... Som
of these people we know... Hunter, Jim, Jill... BUT some of that even when to the Biden grandchildren.
WTF, 30K... The Bidens need to read Trump's book, The Art of The Deal, and negotiate a better price for Hunter's prostitutes.
You were talking about hokes. It's the Mueller that the right keeps calling a hoax. The Durham "investigation" was going to blow it all up.
It didn't.
Not only did the Durham Report find fault with the FBIs investigation into allegations of ties between Russia and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, it also debunked various claims made by leading Democrats in the first two years of Trump's presidency.
BTW, Congressman Adam Schift maybe in the process of being removed because of what did during the Russia Hokes and what the Durham report said specifically about him, and his staffers were trying to intimidate the investigators.
At some point you might want to look at the evidence and come to a different conclusion.
What claims were debunked?
BTW, Congressman Adam Schift maybe in the process of being removed becau what did during the Russia Hokes and what the Durham report said specifi about him, and his staffers were trying to intimidate the investigators.
That would be news, if there is any truth in it.
That would be news, if there is any truth in it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkKmo_B6j9U https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_gEV-u32ec
Just a few...
Was that the drilling in places where permits should never have been issued, perhaps because of severe damage to the economy.
Damage whose economy? The OPEC countries? Venezuela? China?
Certainly not ours.
Mea Culpa -- I meant to say "to the environment".
Inflation continues to rise, and not rise but sky-rocket.
Inflation rate has declined.
Unemployment rate is lower than it has been for half a century.
People who get so discouraged they stop looking for work stop counting as unemployed.
Is there a count of such people? I really do not know.
Tell us why it was not shot down over mid-America? What might have been the result?
Do you mean once they waited until it was over populated mid-America,
or do you mean if they'd done it while it was over areas that are
barely populated?
Did they know about it then?
On the news this morning, they mentioned that US business are going bankrupt at rate not seen since the 2008 Recession, and that market analysts expect business to continue to do so, pushing the rate beyond that seen in 2008.
What were the conditions that would have caused that to happen? Perhaps
they were talking about what will happen if the Speaker does not agree
to pass a clean bill raising the debt ceiling as has always been done.
But he has supported several coup d'état from all over the world and has been influential in other countries affairs with the clearest quid pro quo ever seen.What has Joe Biden done that is positive.What has he done that is *not* positive?
Biden did *not* lead an attempted coup.
- Biden did *not* call dead soldiers 'losers'.Biden did use the term Dog-faced pony soldier to a female American voter. Source of Truth: https://tinyurl.com/bdd3pb9y
- Biden was *not* found liable for sexual abuse.A former neighbor of Reade's named Lynda LaCasse told NPR a conversation the two had approximately 25 years ago regarding the alleged assault.
- Biden was *not* credibly accused of rape and sexual harassment by 26 women.same story as above and if that is not damming enough Biden stole another man's women. When Jill had affair with Joe Biden while she was still married.
- Biden did *not* add $7.8 to the debt.Facts: Biden Brags About Deficit Reduction While Adding Nearly $10 Trillion Source of Truth : https://tinyurl.com/yz3p79wd
- Biden did *not* say 'There are good people on both sides' in Charlottesville.Joe Biden Says "Poor Kids Are Just as Bright as White Kids."
- Biden was *not* responsible for 1,000,000 Covid deaths.Covid-19 Deaths under Biden Surpass Deaths during Trump Administration
- Biden did *not* call for the termination of the Constitution.You are deliberately twisting this.. You can't get your facts straight..
- Biden has *not* repeatedly praised Putin.
- Biden did *not* tell 30,000 lies or falsehoods while in office.Who can tell what Biden is saying half the time with him mumbling with questionable words and slaughtering and stammering attempting to speak.
On 05-24-23 12:41, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Alan Ianson about Re: Durham Report explain <=-
BTW, Congressman Adam Schift maybe in the process of being
removed because of what did during the Russia Hokes and
what the Durham report said specifically about him, and his
staffers were trying to intimidate the investigators.
Pages 96, 233 and page 291On 05-24-23 12:41, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Alan Ianson about Re: Durham Report explain <=-
BTW, Congressman Adam Schift maybe in the process of being
removed because of what did during the Russia Hokes and
what the Durham report said specifically about him, and his
staffers were trying to intimidate the investigators.
Where does the Duram report show any involvement by Adam Schiff? Page number please.
Durham pointed things out... let congress take things from there.
The Durham report pointed what out?
Once they get rid of the partisan DOJ... let the evidence go where it takes
it and throw some of these real scum bags to jail
The DOJ/FBI is not partisan, it's not even a political party.
On 23 May 2023, Alan Ianson said the following...
It was not a hoax. The Mueller report did not charge Donald Trumpwith
anything, it was never going to. It didn't exonerate him either.
https://youtu.be/HMp9_f-jxDw
I did not say Mueller ... The Durham report, just released, said Trump had nothing to do with Russia... It claims the whole thing was setup by Hillary, and perpetuated by the FBI, CIA, media and the power structure of the government. I watched Mueller testify and he has about the same amount
of Alzheimer's as Joe has...
This is not a lie... they are currently trying to investigate this now... FBI whistle blowers gave document numbers to the GOP house investigators...
FBI said they had those documents but aren't releasing them.
DOJ should be the ones to in force the document request... but they are part
of the problem.
There is nothing to expand on. Hillary was investigated and no charges
were made.
Do you not watch the news?? It's been shown that Hillary's investigation was dropped suddenly without being completed. GOP are saying they'll cut the FBI's funding if they can't explain this...
A protitude is coming in to testify? ;)
MTG, says this lady is coming in to give sworn testimony... and has a bank account transfer of $30,000.00 from Joe Biden. Apparently she's seen the smoking gun.
I know that I'm a bit of a news hound.... Things are happening... you have
to be not looking at things purposefully in order to see what you want to see.
I did not say Mueller ... The Durham report, just released, said Trump had
nothing to do with Russia...
Is that what it says?
It claims the whole thing was setup by Hillary, and perpetuated by the FBI,
CIA, media and the power structure of the government.
No, that was the claim that Durham was charged with investigating.
After all those years at the conclusion there are still no charges.
I watched Mueller testify and he has about the same amount of
Alzheimer's as Joe has...
I don't know Meuller aside from the fact that his report does not exonerate
Donald Trump.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkKmo_B6j9U https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_gEV-u32ec
That would be news, if there was any truth to it.
Adam schiff never held the economy hostage. If Keven McCarthy doesn't change course he (and his GOP supporters) are going to tank the economy.
It'll be an American first.
On 05-24-23 12:41, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Alan Ianson about Re: Durham Report explain <=-
Where does the Duram report show any involvement by Adam Schiff? Page number please.
On 05-24-23 12:41, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Alan Ianson about Re: Durham Report explain <=-
Where does the Duram report show any involvement by Adam Schiff? Page number please.
Pages 96, 233 and page 291
Congress is, or has, tabled a $16,000.000.00 sanction against Schift... Even if he does get booted out be said he's running for senate in 2024... He'll more than likely get the seat because of his loyalty the Deep State.
Adam schiff never held the economy hostage. If Keven McCarthy doesn'tIt's not an American first...
change course he (and his GOP supporters) are going to tank the economy.
It'll be an American first.
Constitution says ....
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 7 contains two clauses: The Appropriations Clause
and the Statement and Accounts Clause: "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time."
Every single time the debt celling was raised it was done by congress and was negotiated with the WH, every time. GOP is simply saying, we'll raise the debt celling but you'll have to cut back a little on your discretionary spending...
like... stop leaving $80 BILLION dollars in military equipment to our enemy, ISIS.
The US can't just print money forever willy nilly... Congress needs to pass a budget and the WH needs to suck it up...
Congress is, or has, tabled a $16,000.000.00 sanction against Schift... if he does get booted out be said he's running for senate in 2024... He' more than likely get the seat because of his loyalty the Deep State.
Who tabled that? I haven't heard of this though it sounds like a MTG stunt.
Good luck with that!
There's a thing called the constitution...
Constitution says ....
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 7 contains two clauses: The Appropriations C
and the Statement and Accounts Clause: "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regula Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Mon shall be published from time to time."
I am not sure what you are quoting there but the constitution also says this.
"The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for
services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."
The above is simple and clear.
I have
Liar liar, pants on fire.
and all the major news outlets here are reporting all the things
I have spoken about thus far.... Moreover I follow a few legal channels
on Youtube that have broken it down in the same manner that it's being
reported, no one thus far is deviating from what is being reported...
And you don't realize that all the above equates to hearsay?
What was first, the chicken or the egg?
except you... Funny...
What have I reported? All I'm saying is that you really should read the report before you start presenting other people's interpretation of it, as facts.
The WH press secretary runs away when asked a
question on the Durham report...
Says who? TRUTH Social?
if there was a leg to stand on or an
argument to make she would have made it already.
Why? How is it her job to debunk all the crazy talk, based on hearsay?
I have the Durham report ready, it's search it to verify your position...
Now waiting to hear facts... please help me understand your point of view.
What charges have been filed against Hillary Clinton?
What charges have been filed against Hunter Biden?
What charges have been filed against other Republicans'
perceived enemies?
Pages 96, 233 and page 291
The Dunning-Kruger effect in a nutshell, this is how some people try
to appear smarter than they'll ever be.
On 05-25-23 07:27, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Durham Report explai <=-
BTW, Congressman Adam Schift maybe in the process of being
removed because of what did during the Russia Hokes and
what the Durham report said specifically about him, and his
staffers were trying to intimidate the investigators.
Where does the Durham report show any involvement by Adam Schiff? Page number please.
Pages 96, 233 and page 291
On 05-25-23 10:04, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Durham Report explai <=-
Adam Schift maybe in the process of being removed, I personally don't support this, none the less it may have traction. The same
congress woman who started, requested, his removal has also
requested a $16,000,000.00 sanction be levied to Mr. Schift
his involvement with this Russia Russia business...
On 05-25-23 10:45, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Durham Report explai <=-
Where does the Duram report show any involvement by Adam Schiff? Page number please.
Page 227
Adam Schiff was mentioned a few times in the report. The report said
In the above quoted sections of the report Adam Schiff's
staff were intimidating researchers into the topic ... This
was one of the things mention in the letters to have him
removed.
On 05-25-23 14:35, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Alan Ianson about Re: Durham Report explain <=-
Recent history... recall back in the day when the Democrats lowered
the threshold for 60 to simple majority to cram through some
Obama appointees... remember?? and what did we say then...
don't do it because someday you won't be in power and you
might regret it.... and then you changed the rules to
appoint federal Judges from a 60 vote to simple majority...
and we said don't do that because someday you won't be in
power and you may regret it...
Well then the GOP changed the rules, as per the Democrats
prior actions, we lowered the threshold for Justices and we
crammed in 3 conservative justices... remember how pissed
y'all were...
Who tabled that? I haven't heard of this though it sounds like a MTG
stunt.
Good luck with that!
Anna Paulina Luna, from my home state of Florida... This is getting traction...
Recent history... recall back in the day when the Democrats lowered the threshold for 60 to simple majority to cram through some Obama appointees... remember?? and what did we say then... don't do it because someday you won't be in power and you might regret it.... and then you changed the rules to appoint federal Judges from a 60 vote to simple majority... and we said don't do that because someday you won't be in power and you may regret it...
Well then the GOP changed the rules, as per the Democrats prior actions, we lowered the threshold for Justices and we crammed in 3 conservative justices.. remember how pissed y'all were...
Keep it up!!!! Someday you won't be in power...
Every single time the debt celling was raised it was done by congress and was negotiated with the WH, every time.
GOP is simply saying, we'll raise the debt celling but you'll have to cut back a little on your discretionary spending.... like... stop leaving $80 BILLION dollars in military equipment to our enemy, ISIS.
The US can't just print money forever willy nilly... Congress needs to pass
a budget and the WH needs to suck it up...
Congress is, or has, tabled a $16,000.000.00 sanction against Schift...
Even if he does get booted out be said he's running for senate in 2024...
He'll more than likely get the seat because of his loyalty the Deep State.
Who tabled that? I haven't heard of this though it sounds like a MTG stunt.
Good luck with that!
Adam schiff never held the economy hostage. If Keven McCarthy doesn't
change course he (and his GOP supporters) are going to tank the economy.
It'll be an American first.
It's not an American first...
It would be an American first, the US have never (for very good reasons) defaulted.
There's a thing called the constitution...
Constitution says ....
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 7 contains two clauses: The Appropriations
Clause
and the Statement and Accounts Clause: "No Money shall be drawn from the
Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular
Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money
shall be published from time to time."
I am not sure what you are quoting there but the constitution also says this.
"The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."
The above is simple and clear.
Every single time the debt celling was raised it was done by congress and
was
negotiated with the WH, every time. GOP is simply saying, we'll raise the
debt celling but you'll have to cut back a little on your discretionary
spending...
The debt ceiling is about paying debts that the US government owes.
It is not about new debt or spending. Congress does and is welcome to consider spending at all times and adjust as needed. That is not what is happening here. Congress needs to pay this debt as it always has, or ...
The GOP is holding the economy hostage.
The US can't just print money forever willy nilly... Congress needs to pass
a budget and the WH needs to suck it up...
This is not about printing money, it is about paying the debt that congress
has already spent.
Was that a motion filed by Luna (R-FL)? Did it get any traction?
Two points -- first, the researchers felt as they were intimidated, but
I don't see that there is much justification for their feeling, and
second it was not Adam Shiff who was involved.
Think more about the reasons for that displeasure. The Senate (i.e.
Mitch McConnell) denied Obama to even bring a nominee to a vote for
almost a year. But then Trump rammed through a nominee only several
weeks before his term expired.
Had normal procedure would have been followed, Obama would have gotten a nominee, Trump would have gotten only one nominee and the Biden would
have gotten the third one.
Is it? I still haven't seen it. I haven't gone looking for it either.
Is this what's happening in your right wing bubble?
We know that you don't like Joe Biden and/or the democrats but we are talking about the paying the debt.
This is not some surprise that arrived in the mail. Pay your bills or
your credit rating flops.
That must have been some negotiating - three times - between
the Congress and Donald Trump - each time raising the debt ceiling
rather than rescinding Trump's tax cuts for the wealthy program.
Amendment XIV, Section 4
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized
by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bouties
for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion shall not be questioned.
My, my. Just think of what would happen if and when President Biden decides to cite the 14th Amendment ...
Perhaps you have a different version of the report. The only mention of
Adam Schiff's name that I found were on pages 93, 227 and 281. I quote
the paragraphs that included his name below. I do not see where there
is any thing other than another person mentioning his name. If you see something encriminating there, please enlighten us.
Is it? I still haven't seen it. I haven't gone looking for it either.
Is this what's happening in your right wing bubble?
I think you might be retarded... This is going on in the house as we speak.. The Speaker of the House may be putting it to a full vote.
We know that you don't like Joe Biden and/or the democrats but we are
talking about the paying the debt.
And it'll get paid... The GOP has said they'll raise the celling but there wilL have to be a review of the discretionary spending... That's it... Democrats want to spend like a drunken sailor... GOP says spend money like a sailor who's just had a few...
This is not some surprise that arrived in the mail. Pay your bills or
your credit rating flops.
I don't recall your outrage on debt celling talks that happen with every-other president... Democrats busted Trump's balls. The difference between Trump and Biden is that Trump actively negotiated with the Democrats, where as Biden has no clue he's in Washington DC.
I still doen't see it although I still haven't gone looking for it.
Trump doesn't negotiate, he's a dictator.
A+ to you both for even finding Schiff's name in that jumbled mess, regardless of what it does or does not prove.
Pages 96, 233 and page 291
WOW! He does know how to make a global search on a PDF file!
But does he know how to read any of the three (3) hits of the name? Of course not, if you read and understand it, it's all -- as usual -- just hearsay.
You know, this reminds me of the difference between cooking a meal all by yourself, as opposed to just micro that frozen dinner at 750W for six minutes.
The first cook knows exactly what goes into the dish, the second one has no idea -- even in the unlikely scenario that he read past the 750W/6 minutes, and come down to the ingredients, he still has no idea what he is stuffing his body with.
The same goes with getting your facts right. Either you do your own search and evaluation, or you settle for ready made shite from a favourite "news" outlet, like TRUTH Social.
The Dunning-Kruger effect in a nutshell, this is how some people try to
appear smarter than they'll ever be.
I am not in power, never was and never will be.
The bill has arrived for your debt. Pay it.
This is not some surprise that arrived in the mail. Pay your bills or your credit rating flops.
What charges have been filed against Hillary Clinton?
What charges have been filed against Hunter Biden?
What charges have been filed against other Republicans'
perceived enemies?
I don't think you get it... no charges will be brought...
The Deep State will protect the ruling class.
I did say... if they don't find Joe useful any more he'll go down pretty hard.
On 26 May 2023, Mike Powell said the following...
A+ to you both for even finding Schiff's name in that jumbled mess, regardless of what it does or does not prove.
Thank you for the A+. The original question was what page was AdamI had the same issue with pdf viewer within the browser and even download adobe pdf viewer the find option would not function.
Schiff referred in the Durham report, and there were 3 locations...
It's a public document... like no one could search it and find his name.
Here's a post from today I think... Next News Network Pointing out Schiff's troubles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyyKM9WMQiw&list=WL&index=2&t=293s
On 05-26-23 10:33, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Durham Report explai <=-
Good grief, what you quoted is difficult to read. At first, I thought
the first person to post it butchered it, but you have confirmed that those sections are indeed difficult to follow.
A+ to you both for even finding Schiff's name in that jumbled mess, regardless of what it does or does not prove.
I don't think you get it... no charges will be brought...
Whatever gave you that clue? Could it be John Durham's inability
to have done so? No matter how hard he tried, how hard he huffed and puffed, he just couldn't do it.
I had the same issue with pdf viewer within the browser and even
download adobe pdf viewer the find option would not function.
I do have Microsoft Office I had to have word convert the document and then I was able find references of Adam Schiff.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyyKM9WMQiw&list=WL&index=2&t=293s
Sponsored by Mike (the pillow guy) Lindell.
That explains why it's not in the news!
That explains why it's not in the news!
They showed evidence and facts that could be supported by even CNN...
Who cares about a sponsor...
BTW, my pillow is an extremely good product and can be gotten for a big discount if you use their discount codes, free shipping throughout the continental US as well.
On 26 May 2023, Gregory Deyss said the following...
I had the same issue with pdf viewer within the browser and even download adobe pdf viewer the find option would not function.
I do have Microsoft Office I had to have word convert the document and
then I was able find references of Adam Schiff.
Looks like Durham is going in front of congress soon... and it looks
like there may be a vote to expel Schiff and sanction him the $16,000.000.00. This would be a start at finding some accountability.
On 26 May 2023, Alan Ianson said the following...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyyKM9WMQiw&list=WL&index=2&t=293s
Sponsored by Mike (the pillow guy) Lindell.
That explains why it's not in the news!
They showed evidence and facts that could be supported by even CNN...Alan, won't tell us how CNN was pushing the Trump-Russia narrative which turned out to be Fake News.. Now it's the FBI and the DOJ and CNN and pMSNBC including that smug witch on CBS nightly news and others will cover for these demons too. There ain't a side of the tracks more wrong than under 'em.
Mike Lindell has been showing his evidence and facts for years.That explains why it's not in the news!They showed evidence and facts that could be supported by even CNN...
Who cares about a sponsor...
It's important to know that this is not news, it's sponsored
(engineered) by Mike (the pillow guy) Lindell.
No No, Alan pays twice the retail price. Liberals spend other peoples money,BTW, my pillow is an extremely good product and can be gotten for a big discount if you use their discount codes, free shipping throughout the continental US as well.
I don't think you get it... no charges will be brought...
Whatever gave you that clue? Could it be John Durham's inability
to have done so? No matter how hard he tried, how hard he huffed and
puffed, he just couldn't do it.
No, I just see the system and being rigged... There is something sinister afoot and there is nothing a can do to change things.
Just because charges are brought, or not brought, doesn't change the bad thing the US went through because of this Russia Hokes.
BTW, Durham is going to testify soon in front of congress...
I had the same issue with pdf viewer within the browser and even
download adobe pdf viewer the find option would not function.
I do have Microsoft Office I had to have word convert the document and
then I was able find references of Adam Schiff.
Looks like Durham is going in front of congress soon... and it looks like there may be a vote to expel Schiff and sanction him the $16,000.000.00. This would be a start at finding some accountability.
BTW, my pillow is an extremely good product and can be gotten for a big
discount if you use their discount codes, free shipping throughout the
continental US as well.
No No, Alan pays twice the retail price.
Liberals spend other peoples money, so its fine. Right Alan?
Liberals spend other peoples money, so its fine.
I hope Florida Rep Anna Paulina Luna gets the 218 votes that is needed.
These people need to be swiftly and absolutely CRUSHED, without any apology.
CNN...That explains why it's not in the news!They showed evidence and facts that could be supported by even
Mike Lindell has been showing his evidence and facts for years.
Who cares about a sponsor...
It's important to know that this is not news, it's sponsored
(engineered) by Mike (the pillow guy) Lindell.
bigBTW, my pillow is an extremely good product and can be gotten for a
thediscount if you use their discount codes, free shipping throughout
continental US as well.
No No, Alan pays twice the retail price. Liberals spend other peoples money,
so its fine. Right Alan?
Liberals spend other peoples money, so its fine.
So, how do you classify the TCJC $1.9T that the GOP spent in 2017, if not spending other peoples money to enrich the already mega-rich?
When did the GOP ever spend any of the $7.8T that they raised the US
debt with during the four Trump years, on other people than themselves
and their donors?
People who think that democratic elections are all about picking the
right winner, are in dire need of re-education.
The truth will find its way to the surface, always does.
BTW, my pillow is an extremely good product and can be gotten for a big
discount if you use their discount codes, free shipping throughout the
continental US as well.
No No, Alan pays twice the retail price.
I never bought and pillows from the pillow guy.
Liberals spend other peoples money, so its fine. Right Alan?
No, that is a false right wing talking point.
Liberals spend other peoples money, so its fine.
So, how do you classify the TCJC $1.9T that the GOP spent in 2017, if not spending other peoples money to enrich the already mega-rich?
When did the GOP ever spend any of the $7.8T that they raised the US debt with during the four Trump years, on other people than themselves and their
donors?
The truth will find its way to the surface, always does.
Q: What's the difference between a consipiracy theory and the truth?
A: Three months.
Alan is not worth discussing anything with. He doesn't have critical thinking or reasoning skills and believes everything he's told by his government and Canadian media completely and without question. Even his fellow Canadians in Fidonet have told me this.
I put Alan into my twit filter in here so I can concentrate on real discussion instead of his constant pious bloviating.
The truth will find its way to the surface, always does.
Q: What's the difference between a consipiracy theory and the truth?
A: Three months.
Alan is not worth discussing anything with.
On 05-28-23 10:46, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Björn Felten about Re: Durham Report explain <=-
Conservatives do not see groups or victims. We want everyone to
succeed. The tired charge that WE Conservatives are racist, sexist, bigot, homophob does not exist within us, again we want everyone to succeed.
You say that, but the GOP record of what they do is far from it. GOP controlled states are busy passing laws that effectively restrict the ability to vote of minorities, passing laws that restrict education that even mentions gender, bans books, and is seen as a party of rich old
white men.
The truth will find its way to the surface, always does.
Q: What's the difference between a consipiracy theory and the truth?
A: Three months.
Alan is not worth discussing anything with. He doesn't have criticalhis
thinking or reasoning skills and believes everything he's told by his
government and Canadian media completely and without question. Even
fellow Canadians in Fidonet have told me this.
Yes I have gathered this for sometime now, the light is on but no one has been home for decades. Alan is not alone, there are others who are just as
dense.
People who think that Biden is just wonderful.
They all seem to be wearing those special glasses that show the optic nerve?the same thing for the ears. I would get my money back because
only the positive feel good stories and yes they seem to also have hearing devices from the same manufacture; that does
these people are living in a dreamworld that is completely disconnected from
reality.
I put Alan into my twit filter in here so I can concentrate on real
discussion instead of his constant pious bloviating.
It's good to hear from you Sean, Be Well.
Conservatives do not see groups or victims. We want everyone to
succeed. The tired charge that WE Conservatives are racist, sexist,
bigot, homophob does not exist within us, again we want everyone to
succeed.
You say that, but the GOP record of what they do is far from it. GOP controlled states are busy passing laws that effectively restrict the ability to vote of minorities, passing laws that restrict education that even mentions gender, bans books, and is seen as a party of rich old
white men.
You say that, but the GOP record of what they do is far from it. GOP
controlled states are busy passing laws that effectively restrict the
ability to vote of minorities, passing laws that restrict education that
even mentions gender, bans books, and is seen as a party of rich old
white men.
The devil is in the details. You're being very generalistic.
Show me the bills of which you speak of. It's a kinder way of saying PUSU.
Alternative Genders other then Boy or Girl should have no place within any house of education.
These books that you say are being banned...
Do you have any idea what is in these books, these are not text books from the good folks at McGraw-Hill Education in many cases these pornographic and explicit in nature, which is why they should be banned for minors.
Here is another list of banned books https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=banned+books+in+schools+
Banning "To Kill a Mockingbird" is ridiculous, but why, is it on the banned
list because these good for nothing liberal colleges are indoctrinating students as they are making them intolerant to a book written from earlier time in history, editing existing works is now underway as well.
Why? So they will not offend the easily offended or overly sensitive. Other works being modified Isaac Asimov and even Ian Fleming 007 Dumb as Fu*k
This nation needs more testosterone, to which may I recommend
This is an international echo, where folks from around the world
are welcome to participate, in the language of their choice. Maybe
you should expand your horizons by listening to what they have to
say. Even if you don't like it, you might learn a thing or two.
Dr. Jill does. As well as his dogs (who are also very loyal).'Jill baby' might be into Joe for the $money$ and definitely not for the ride. I can see it now, Joe punching himself in his own crotch,
And everybody knows he trounced the orange one by over 7 million
votes in the last election ...
He thinks this is the FLAME echo. And maybe it is, come to thinkAs I said before your not even nodelisted.
of it. After all, there is no real moderator. And there are no real
rules ...
I hope Florida Rep Anna Paulina Luna gets the 218 votes that is needed.
This is not about sides. This money has already been spent, the bills have >> arrived and it's due now.
Again, why did they spend money they didn't have?
That's what govt's do. The collect revenue and they spend it on the nations in
rests.
At the end of the month the bills arrive and they need to be paid.
I think you might be retarded...
And it'll get paid... The GOP has said they'll raise the celling but there wil
have to be a review of the discretionary spending... That's it... Democrats w
t to spend like a drunken sailor... GOP says spend money like a sailor who's j
t had a few...
You say that, but the GOP record of what they do is far from it. GOP controlled states are busy passing laws that effectively restrict the
ability to vote of minorities, passing laws that restrict education that
even mentions gender, bans books, and is seen as a party of rich old
white men. ^^^^^^^^^^
than under 'em. The truth will find its way to the surface, always does.
Speaker McCarthy can do many things.
He does not seem to understand the negotiation process that is going
on... "we will pay this debt if you stop spending so much and putting us in (more) debt..." He is not able to make the connection between the
two.
That's what govt's do. The collect revenue and they spend it on the nations >> in rests.
Governments should spend money they don't have, and don't have the revenue streams to cover.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Sean Dennis <=-
I would get my money back because these people are
living in a dreamworld that is completely disconnected from
reality.
It's good to hear from you Sean, Be Well.
Mike Powell wrote to IB JOE <=-
He does not seem to understand the negotiation process that is going
on... "we will pay this debt if you stop spending so much and putting
us in (more) debt..." He is not able to make the connection between
the two.
IB Joe wrote to Mike Powell <=-
What did we learn from the Twitter buyout ... we learned
that you can fire ~80% of your staff and still run a
company ... Washington should take note...
Mike Powell wrote to DALE SHIPP <=-
If dumbasses on the left were not so dead-set on
having books in school libraries that, for example, graphically depict oral sex between two underaged males, this wouldn't be happening.
If you try to explain that to a leftist moron who wanted such things in the schools, they won't understand. If it was oral sex between an underaged male and underaged female, most of them would call it out for being the pornography that it is.
They also won't understand that, thanks to them, there are several more harmless books that are gone from schools and that even "used"
retailers like eBay won't allow to be sold.
Dale Shipp wrote to Gregory Deyss <=-
You say that, but the GOP record of what they do is far from it. GOP controlled states are busy passing laws that effectively restrict the ability to vote of minorities, passing laws that restrict education
that even mentions gender, bans books, and is seen as a party of rich
old white men.
I hope Florida Rep Anna Paulina Luna gets the 218 votes that is needed.
They may have the votes...
and it maybe going forward.
Durham is suppose to be in front of congress soon to testify...
I'd like to hear what he has to say!!
This is an international echo, where folks from around the world
are welcome to participate, in the language of their choice. Maybe
you should expand your horizons by listening to what they have to
say. Even if you don't like it, you might learn a thing or two.
"You ain't nothin' but a couyon!"
This coming from someone (you) who is not even nodelisted.
Bless your heart.
Maybe you should head over yonder and take a gander look-see at Policy 4
https://www.fidonet.org/policy4.txt
as per Policy 4.07 document of June 9th 1989
1.0 Language
The official language of FidoNet is English. All documents must exist in English. Translation into other languages is encouraged.
Dr. Jill does. As well as his dogs (who are also very loyal).
And everybody knows he trounced the orange one by over 7 million
votes in the last election ...
'Jill baby' might be into Joe for the $money$ and definitely not for the ride. I can see it now, Joe punching himself in his own crotch,
gasping "wake up dam it, c'mon man." Then as he bends down a slow and creepy
whisper escapes his lips "for real, stop being a dog-faced pony soldier."
I would wager w/ his dogs there is plenty tilting of the heads w /confusion.
He thinks this is the FLAME echo. And maybe it is, come to think
of it. After all, there is no real moderator. And there are no real
rules ...
As I said before your not even nodelisted.
So Don't be worrying your gumbo head about Sean.
You're so far down from his level of greatness, just fuggedaboutit.
Speaker McCarthy can do many things.
Yes, like lead us out of a crisis and to a resolution...
Banning books that have sexual perversion to push it on children is bad? What kind of pervert are you?
this one is funny. they make it sound like the books are unavailable. they can
be purchased on amazon, checked out from the library, etc. we just don't want them in school libraries or in the children's section of public libraries. in fact to avoid problems i'm sure many libraries specifically keep them in the general library and not the children's/young adults part.
the problem is they HATE that they don't have direct access to children. it's not good enough that it's easily available. it has to also be easily happened upon by a young child. it doesn't work if children can't accidentally look through it and see pictures of sexual acts. in the 70s the authors of these books probably would have spent a good portion of their time walking the streets naked covered only by a trenchcoat.
He does not seem to understand the negotiation process that is going on...
IB Joe wrote to Mike Powell <=-
What did we learn from the Twitter buyout ... we learned that you can
fire ~80% of your staff and still run a company ... Washington should
take note...
IB Joe wrote to Gregory Deyss <=-
They may have the votes... and it maybe going forward. Durham is
suppose to be in front of congress soon to testify... I'd like to hear what he has to say!!
Sean Dennis wrote to Gregory Deyss <=-
I just think that these people have their heads so far up their rectums that they've cut off all oxygen to their brains.
I chuckle at the fact that a lot of non-Americans in here think they
can pontificate about American politics believing what their mainstream media tells them which is normally wholesale fabrications. Especially
Congress is a voter-endorsed prison. So many career criminals like Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Shumer (sp?), Mitch McConnell (and his Chinese wife)...I could go on and on. Let's not forget the Biden crime family. Heck,
even the Dimmies don't want Biden anymore. He needs to be in a nursing home enjoying ice cream and not being an empty vessel for Obama's third term.
There are enough Republicans alone to expel George Santos
from the House. Yet, they have chosen not to do so. Why?
Because Speaker McCarthy needs his vote in order to remain
Speaker.
Durham was not able to find evidence to file charges against
any Republicans' perceived enemies. But the Repuclican-majority
House can subpoena him anytime it wants to testify ...
Governments should spend money they don't have, and don't have the revenue streams to cover.
Is that so?
So passing laws that effectively restrict the ability to vote of minorities, you need an ID to open a bank account, you need an ID to buy booze or tobacco, you need an ID to register a car, but no ID to prove you're a citizen of this country to affect its future? So you're okay with illegal aliens (who make up a majority of the minorities according to the feds) deciding the future of the country you were born in?
Banning books that have sexual perversion to push it on children is bad?
What kind of pervert are you?
Alan is Canadian. No matter how he pretends to know US politics, he has no clue. I don't pretend to know everything about Canadian politics (to me, an insider, it looks pretty much like a dictatorship, just like the US right now). That is why I twitted him. Ignorance is no excuse for an arguement.
He does not seem to understand the negotiation process that is goingon...
What some people obviously fail to understand, is the huge difference between raising the debt ceiling (yes or no) and discussing the budget.
Someone really should tell them that the budgetary debate comes later this year.
There are enough Republicans alone to expel George Santos
from the House. Yet, they have chosen not to do so. Why?
Because Speaker McCarthy needs his vote in order to remain
Speaker.
The problem with kicking a representative, politician, out for being a lier
you'll have to get rid of them all.
Let the electorate vote him in or out.
George Santos even said he lied.
Durham was not able to find evidence to file charges against
any Republicans' perceived enemies. But the Repuclican-majority
House can subpoena him anytime it wants to testify ...
You don't know...
he'll be testifying soon, wait like anyone else to see what
he says.
Someone really should tell them that the budgetary debate comes later
this year.
Oh boy oh boy oh boy! Just in time for Christmas!
Here comes Santa Claus!
Here comes Santa Claus!
Right down Santa Claus Lane!
On 05-30-23 11:47, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: See what they do, no <=-
Then your statement as it relates to the difficulty of minorities to vote remains unproven. Besides what are we really talking about here Democrats - and how they are being treated unfairly, clearly if that was the case people would have revolted or don't you remember the riots of 2020 chaos, and no the majority of those events were far from peaceful protests.The news of any kind rarely gives the number of a bill, but rather jus
what the effect is. Texas and Georgia passed laws that have the effec
of making it harder for minorities to vote. Some of the tools are reducing the days for voting, reducing the number of ballot boxes, and
even things that make it harder to wait in line at a polling place -- e.g. a crime to give water to those in line.
Again show me the bills or current laws that exist.
You can stand behind that mantra all you like, but you know your request is not possible.
Right, such as Steele Dossier hoax?I believe what is happening here is the use of a liberalYou believe. I state facts. Big difference.
lens to find fault when in reality there is really nothing
to gripe about.
The burden of proof is yours to prove, facts do this nicely.I think when the facts are known it
will turn out to be a whole lot of nothing.
There have been all sorts of things done. One example was South Dakota removing all voters from the roles who did not have a valid street address, knowing full well that such a requirement hit the native Americans hard since many of them live on reservations that had no
street addresses. I have named other things. If you have not heard of such things, then you need to expand your sources of knowledge.
These people exist, they are always in your face propagating filth.Being blunt as it refers to biology.
If you have a penis then you're a boy, if you have a vagina
then you're a girl. What is so complex about that?
Perhaps that is your simplistic explanation -- but it is not always that simple. You are automatically excluding all who are part of the LBGTQ+ spectrum.
You are confusing drag queens with cross dressers. As to drag queen
story hour for elementary school children, I have only recently heard of this, nor heard why it is being done. I'll leave judgement until I hear information as to why the educators are allowing it.
You removed what I was responding to. Here it is:It was not intentional, but yes you are welcome for that of which is below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vofiOCIWnCY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZaByNEPBeU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkgU0ZtKUxg https://www.youtube.com/shorts/1gSsEHu4UZ0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vofiOCIWnCY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uLKs1PoIEcbanned list because these good for nothing liberal colleges are indoctrinating students as they are making them intolerant
to a book written from earlier time in history, editing
existing works is now underway as well.
I don't understand where you are getting such a statement. What do book bans have to do with "liberal colleges"? How are they indoctrinating students? Or the rest of your statements in that paragraph, none of
which make sense to me.
Politicians never lie. They are just more expedient with the truth.
So that is not the issue. At least not in this case. The real issue
is that George Santos has been indicted, on multiple counts, and is
likely to be convicted on most, if not all, of those charges, and
sent to prison.
laterSomeone really should tell them that the budgetary debate comes
this year.
Oh boy oh boy oh boy! Just in time for Christmas!
Here comes Santa Claus!
Here comes Santa Claus!
Right down Santa Claus Lane!
Sorry Lee. Here's a secret: this lefty Euro Trash Pacifist Shit Pig Pussy actually knows, that the budgetary debate must be ended on October 1st.
Yeah, if not the MAGA idiots come up with another stunt to try to make the Dems look bad. After all, that's the only card they've had for five decades
now. I think that eventually someone is able to call their bluff.
Not to say that all the brainwashed idiots will ever understand what hit them.
Politicians never lie. They are just more expedient with the truth.
So that is not the issue. At least not in this case. The real issue
is that George Santos has been indicted, on multiple counts, and is
likely to be convicted on most, if not all, of those charges, and
sent to prison.
So then when Trump says that the 2020 election was stolen then it's the truth.
On 05-31-23 09:27, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: A window provides cle <=-
The news of any kind rarely gives the number of a
bill, but rather jus
what the effect is. Texas and Georgia passed
laws that have the effec
of making it harder for minorities to vote. Some of the tools are reducing the days for voting, reducing the number
of ballot boxes, and
even things that make it harder to wait in line
at a polling place --
e.g. a crime to give water to those in line.
Again show me the bills or current laws that exist.
You can stand behind that mantra all you like, but you know your request is not possible.
Then your statement as it relates to the difficulty of minorities to
vote remains unproven.
That is the problem, as you have no issue with calling these legitimate and that there are multiple examples.Then your statement as it relates to the difficulty of minorities to vote remains unproven.
It is proven by the recurring presence in multiple legitimate news sources.
As an example, this week the Republican legislatation in Texas passed a law which allows them to replace the (Democratic) election supervisor in Harris county. Harris county happens to be strongly Democratic in a mostly Republican state. The law *only* applies to Harris county.
Google will show you multiple reporting on these facts. Here is one
such:
On 06-03-23 12:53, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Voting <=-
Then your statement as it relates to the difficulty of minorities to
vote remains unproven.
It is proven by the recurring presence in multiple legitimate news sources.
That is the problem, as you have no issue with calling
these legitimate and that there are multiple examples.
The real truth is that there is no such thing as legitimate news
source as these are corporations who have a left leaning agenda and
not only this but they craft this as a production that has
a intentional purpose, orchestrated and executed and are
built in a way to make you sit on the edge of your seat as
you digest what they are suggesting. You don't seem to
understand that they have built this for your mind to make
you believe their narrative as they hope that it becomes
yours.
The truth as it relates to Harris County is that
March 8, 2022
The elections administrator Isabel Longoria in Harris County, Texas, announced Tuesday that she had submitted her resignation,
amid a mail-in ballot counting discrepancy in election
night results.
As an example, this week the Republican legislatation in Texas passed a law which allows them to replace the (Democratic) election supervisor in Harris county. Harris county happens to be strongly Democratic in a mostly Republican state. The law *only* applies to Harris county.
Google will show you multiple reporting on these facts. Here is one
such:
Incorrect, she resigned in disgrace.
Google can not trusted as they lean left.
The real truth is that there is no such thing as legitimate news source as these are corporations who have a left leaning agenda and not only this but they craft this as a production that has
a intentional purpose, orchestrated and executed and are
built in a way to make you sit on the edge of your seat as
you digest what they are suggesting. You don't seem to
understand that they have built this for your mind to make
you believe their narrative as they hope that it becomes
yours.
Your opinion, not mine.
So how is this different or incorrect, from what I said. She resigned.Incorrect, she resigned in disgrace.
Not incorrect. Longoria resigned because of errors
What I'm saying is that there is liberal bias within Media especially CNN. This left leaning bias does not just exist within the media, it exists in periodicals, newspapers and it is prevalent on the Internet too.Google can not trusted as they lean left.Google is a search engine, full stop.
I am not sure how to fix that, either.
Paper only. In person, except for absentee voting with all the restrictions around it. Voting only 1 day and all votes counted in each precinct that day.
I would be very leary of some national-level requirements
Those requirements are unconstutional on their face.
because we both know the current
administration would have all the states allowing all sorts of stupid stuff.
As well as Blue states.
You should be able to sort the little cards from 0-X and see if someone's missing or duplicated. You should be able to sort the ballots from 0-(Y+Z) an
see if a ballot is missing. And, of course X should equal Y.
Oh, but math is racist.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
They were stuffing paper ballots, so how does that help? There are
areas where they cheated long before COVID and multiple day voting.
I agree, none of the electronic touch-screen machines, but those old tabulating machines we used to use (pull lever) worked here great, and were a lot faster than the touch-screens.
Also, some folks seem to think "paper only and hand counting only" will fix it. There is no way they'd get them all counted "that day" that
way,
and there is no way you'd convince someone like me that someone hand-counting it will somehow be less biased than a machine. After
all, the machine is biased because of how a *person* programmed it.
In person is good. One vote per person is good. Each ballot only able
to be counted once is good. The only way you can enforce those last
two, especially the last one, is if a machine counts them.
I would go as far as to say the ballot should expire after X amount of time. That way it cannot easily leave the polling location and come
back later, and it cannot be pulled back out from under a table and rescanned later.
Part of the reason I like the idea of multiple days is that it keeps places like Leftistexcrementholeville from claiming that people don't
have enough time to vote and trying to keep the polls open past 6pm on Election night. They used to complain all the time.
Our paper ballots go into a locked machine. I don't know if it
tabulates it or not at that moment, but it tells us that our ballot has been accepted.
I would rather them not tabulate, or at least not be able to tell
anyone what was tabulated, until after 6pm Election night. On the
other hand, it could be handy if it gave the voter a receipt that told them what their ballot was counted as... although I see a lot of
confusion and people claiming it was wrong when it really wasn't if it could do that.
and there is no way you'd convince someone like me that someone hand-counting it will somehow be less biased than a machine. After
all, the machine is biased because of how a *person* programmed it.
The problem is that it's easy to produce a bunch of machines to cheat. It's much harder to produce a bunch of people who will cheat.
In person is good. One vote per person is good. Each ballot only able to be counted once is good. The only way you can enforce those last two, especially the last one, is if a machine counts them.
Only if the code is open source, vetted as correct, and the machines are completely disconnected from any ability to change after loaded with the software. Hm.... I just realized that we do almost all of this with electronic payment devices that stores use to read your credit card.
I would go as far as to say the ballot should expire after X amount of time. That way it cannot easily leave the polling location and come back later, and it cannot be pulled back out from under a table and rescanned later.
But this is how the machines were designed. They were designed to allow for cheating.
Currently, I do not trust **any** current machine to tabulate ballots.
Part of the reason I like the idea of multiple days is that it keeps places like Leftistexcrementholeville from claiming that people don't have enough time to vote and trying to keep the polls open past 6pm on Election night. They used to complain all the time.
Does anyone listen to those ignorants? They are the same ones who keep pushin
the false Narrative that "Blacks can't get IDs to vote."
Polls are open long enough for nearly everyone to be able to vote in person. For the outliars, we have mail in voting.
Our paper ballots go into a locked machine. I don't know if it tabulates it or not at that moment, but it tells us that our ballot has been accepted.
In my area, it's a locked box. About the only thing it does it verify that th
ballot is not spoiled (i.e. you voted for 2 candidates when you were only allowed to vote for 1).
There's no perfect solution to this. About all we can do is make voter fraud not worth the effort.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
I don't think so. For local elections, yes, but you honestly don't
think they could find plenty of Never-Trumpers in electoral-vote rich states?
I don't know that they were designed to allow for it specifically,
You can honestly mis-map a screen, but I would expect then that all choices of Y would also turn into votes for X. I have never heard of
that happening. Have you?
I like mail-in even less than multilple day in-person.
I like mail-in even less than multilple day in-person.
When I say "mail in voting", I'm talking about the process that's been in plac
for a long time. I show up at the city office and explain my need (i.e. I wil
be out of state that day), then show my ID, and I am given a ballot that I can
fill out and mail in.
Again, much harder to cheat. And if you have an Elitist run state (like Michigan), the Sec of State will ignore the law and set her own election rules
and the AG will not prosecute the people who broke the laws.
| Sysop: | deepend |
|---|---|
| Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
| Users: | 253 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 14:08:19 |
| Calls: | 1,646 |
| Files: | 3,994 |
| Messages: | 387,903 |