Mike Powell wrote to ALL <=-
I don't think there is any conspiracy to keep this out of the news, although I won't claim that I would be confortable drinking the water
or breathing the air there.
But the Ohio derailment (because there have been more derailments recently) is certainly newsworthy due to the extreme mishandling of things. It's not generally reported and there are no other, more important, news items.
So, I have to call this non-reporting a "conspiracy".
But the Ohio derailment (because there have been more derailments recently) is certainly newsworthy due to the extreme mishandling of things. It's not generally reported and there are no other, more important, news items.
So, I have to call this non-reporting a "conspiracy".
On 02-17-23 07:36, Ron L. <=-
spoke to Mike Powell about Re: The Train Wreck <=-
But the Ohio derailment (because there have been more derailments recently) is certainly newsworthy due to the extreme mishandling of things. It's not generally reported and there are no other, more important, news items.
So, I have to call this non-reporting a "conspiracy".
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
There's a lack of coverage about the covid "vaccine" not being a
vaccine.
Dan Bongino is now openly advising people against the vaccine, which is great, but he should have been saying that long ago (the big faker.)
There's a lack of coverage about every nasty thing the Democrats are doing. People still don't know that Joe peddled influence in Ukraine,
or that he ripped open the border to accommodate the Soros Media
Company.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
So I believe *that* is what "they" (the press or, more specifically, Biden's press handlers) are trying to cover-up or gloss-over.
So I believe *that* is what "they" (the press or, more specifically, Biden's press handlers) are trying to cover-up or gloss-over.
It's certainly getting harder to tell what's real, what's Narrative,
what's real but warped to fit the narrative. The Elitists are well known
for never letting an opportunity go to waste.
There's a lack of coverage about the covid "vaccine" not being a vaccine.
That's been the case for a while now. But we now know that lack of coverage to be active censorship.
And it's why I stopped watching the Propaganda Ministry (aka "mainstream" media) and sought out alternative news sources.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
True. I turned on the local news this morning, and the train wreck was
a top story. It was all still the same report, though... government official says everything OK, townspeople still angry... except they
added that some government medical response team was going to be there
to try to put the town at ease.
Last night I saw a report that included current drone footage. The
crash is cleaned off the track, although there are still some deformed
and damaged railcars nearby. It looked like the track had been rebuilt or, at least, freshly ballasted.
There may turn out to be negligence on the part of the railroad (I have not heard what started the derailment)
So I believe *that* is what "they" (the press or, more specifically, Biden's press handlers) are trying to cover-up or gloss-over.
It's certainly getting harder to tell what's real, what's Narrative,
what's real but warped to fit the narrative. The Elitists are well known
for never letting an opportunity go to waste.
True. I turned on the local news this morning, and the train wreck was a top story. It was all still the same report, though... government official says everything OK, townspeople still angry... except they added that some government medical response team was going to be there to try to put the town at ease.
Interesting, last I heard FEMA declined to send any aid. For "government medical response", which "government"? Local, state, federal?
And, of course, are any of these people who claim everything's OK actually drinking the water?
There may turn out to be negligence on the part of the railroad (I have not heard what started the derailment)
Ya, that lack of investigation is giving rise to sabotage rumors.
But any focus on the derailment is just a smoke screen. We do need to knowh
that happened, but the important question is why they decided to burn allhos
toxic chemicals and why they sill insist that it was safer.
MIKE POWELL wrote to Dr. What <=-
There is another story that has fallen out of the news cycles, at least locally, that feels "burried." What is happening to the kid that ran
that fradulent crypto scheme and donated his profits to democrat candidates? You know, the one that was first or second on the top 2022 donor list with George Soros.
That one has gone quiet.
There was a report on the Weather Channel (why them I don't know?) that was posted the week after the derailment that showed supposed security cam footage from ~20 miles away. That footage showed one of the cars was sparking and possibly on fire. That would play along with the investigation into whether or not one of the cars had an axle issue.
Ya, but railroads have sensors in place to detect that. 20 miles away?
The engineer would have known much sooner than that and stopped the train before there was a big problem.
alkingThe last report I saw (and others before it) indicated that allowing them to drain from the cars and burn was better than keeping them contained in the cars and exploding due to the existing fire.
That's the excuse that I heard too. I wonder what "experts" they were
to. The ones that are outstanding in the fields, or the ones chosen forheir
intersectionality and are just out, standing in their fields.
The reason that I ask about the gov't level is the trust factor. We can be resonably certain that the federal level will just tow the Narrative. The local level will probably be more trustworthy. The state gov't seems like
a group that would try to sweep things under the rug, but I don't have good information about that.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
Yes, hot box sensors. I am not certain how far they are apart, i.e. in miles. Supposedly, the train did pass at least one and it was not working. The train crew was not aware of that fact.
Part of the recent
labor dispute was that the railroads want to start staffing trains with only 1 person, the engineer.
Not sure. They made it sound like it was the railroad's decision,
which would make me think they had an idea of what was being hauled and what they thought was best. If it was the government, I would expect
it to be more likely the "out, standing" variety. :)
But this is another red flag. Hot box detectors broadcast their findingsver
a normal radio. Rail fans often tune into these because it can tell themhen
a train is coming.
For an engineer to not notice one is "missing" is certainly strange.
e.Part of the recent
labor dispute was that the railroads want to start staffing trains with only 1 person, the engineer.
That's not recent. 1 person trains have been the norm for a while now, at least on many other railroads.
That's why engines are equiped with a mechanism to make the engineer prove that he's still awake. They have to do things like acknowledge signals
or the train automatically goes into emergency breaking. I'm not sure if
the hot box detector is part of that, though. But I would think it should
Not sure. They made it sound like it was the railroad's decision,
which would make me think they had an idea of what was being hauled and what they thought was best. If it was the government, I would expect
it to be more likely the "out, standing" variety. :)
Which makes me think along the lines of: the railroad **thought** they knew what they were hauling, but someone sent some cars with stuff that wasn't recorded. After that, it was a series of making decisions without 100%
of the available information.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
IIRC, and ironically, some passenger trains are 1-person in the cab. I didn't think that freight trains did that. Maybe they do but, if true,
it should not be.
Maybe. I would be surprised they didn't know what they were hauling,
but not shocked.
Are you a railfan? I have been trying to get back into model RRing for
a while now, but never seem to feel up to it after work. That should change soon enough. :)
I was a big railfan, but today not so much. No trains in my local area anymore.
I mainly enjoy watching videos of trains where I used to live (since there are
plenty of railfans still there) and I've always been interested in "industrial
archeology", so I like reading up on rail systems that served things like old mines.
MIKE POWELL wrote to Dr. What <=-
That is too bad. I can actually see a former Class 1 mainline from the front of my house (at least, during the times of year when the leaves
are gone!). It is a shortline now that sees 2-4 trains a day running between Lexington and the Louisville area.
I like watching videos of older trains, and engines...
the industrial bit of it. One of my first jobs was at a meat packing plant that used to do a lot of rail business. By the time I got there, they only moved tank cars, but there were still some old reefers parked
Ya, it is. I've been near trains pretty much all my live. My home towntill
has a CSX line running through. When I visited my grandparents, they were 2 blocks from the C&NW ore yard - and there was another short line near by too.
But where I live now, the tracks have long been converted to trails. The nearest trains are a good 30 minutes away, in a part of the city I reallyon'
want to go to.
I remember a while back, one of my co-workers told us he was quitting. As usual, we asked where he was going. He said "Loram". I was the only one in the group who recognized the name. "The rail grinding company?!" He laughed and said yes. He was going to be working on the computers for those machines (since the process is mostly automated). Lucky guy.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
My great-grandmother's house had either an L&N or a Illinois Central
line running through the front yard. She passed when I was young. If
it was L&N, it is still likely there, as a CSX line. My aunt and uncle near Grand Rapids also had a line that ran along their property line.
I think it was probably Grand Trunk. It is a trail now.
There were some places around Louisville that would have been great for train watching if they were not in such bad areas. Southern's main
yard in town was in a bad area, and I think IC's was also.
I'm in the Grand Rapids area now. They seemed to have converted most of those
old lines to trails.
The east/west one west of Grand Rapids city was Grant Trunk. Supposedly you can bike all the way to Muskegon.
The north/south one goes from the north end of Grand Rapids city all the way t
Cadillac. I think that one was Pere Marquette.
There were some places around Louisville that would have been great for train watching if they were not in such bad areas. Southern's main
yard in town was in a bad area, and I think IC's was also.
Even back in our grandparent's day, the areas near the trains was not a good area. But I think it's much worse today.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
Now I am curious, I will have to look it up in some old atlases I have
and see which one it is. They lived North of the city, near Belmont.
Now I am curious, I will have to look it up in some old atlases I have and see which one it is. They lived North of the city, near Belmont.
Belmont is on the old Pere Marquette route from Grand Rapids to Cadillac.
I used to bike through there all the time on the trail. It's now the Fred Meijer White Pine trail.
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 253 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 14:30:09 |
Calls: | 1,646 |
Files: | 3,994 |
Messages: | 387,903 |