Anyone else have a problem with the LFS section on creating an
initrd?
Alexey Vissarionov wrote to Andrew Alt <=-
Anyone else have a problem with the LFS section on creating an
initrd?
Do you still use floppies? If not, you don't need the initrd at all.
Keeping the modules for disk controllers that don't need external
firmware compiled into the kernel is generally a wise idea for several good reasons. Support for everything else may be built as modules and loaded from the /lib/modules during the userspace initialization.
Anyone else have a problem with the LFS section on creating an initrd? Me
and a friend tried the mkinitramfs from https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/initramfs.html
When we ran it, we wound up with a 770Mb file. When we extracted it with cpio, it only extracted about 64K bytes. We tried a few times and the
results were consistent.
It only contained a few files, related to microcode (I don't have access to his computer right now so I can't be more specific).
Alan Ianson wrote to Andrew Alt <=-
I don't normally use an initramfs but I had one with a gentoo install
and I found the same thing. Gentoo's initramfs tool (i forget what it called now) created a huge initramfs but I was only able to see the intel-ucode bits of it when I tried to look inside of it.
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 253 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 52:01:14 |
Calls: | 1,647 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 4,003 |
Messages: | 387,110 |