Re: Re: Election
By: Vlk-451 to Andeddu on Sat Dec 05 2020 01:31 pm
A 'debate', as a noun, is understood as a formal discussion between people or groups of people that is regulated. Interestingly, debates are considered based on 'arguments', which are lines of reasoning, support or evidence about a subject. However, a debate has the feeling of a larger, longer or more formal discussion. A formal debate may even be judged by a person or a panel of people, with one side winning the debate by providing the best lines of reasoning or support for the issue. For example, She argued that people should have the right to decide about their own medical care at the debate.
A lot of the time certain posters here constitute a 'debate' as hurling insults at one another. I won't name names, but it's fairly evident who they are.
Re: Re: Election
By: Dennisk to Dumas Walker on Wed Dec 09 2020 09:07 pm
It seems odd how easily some are willing to dismiss fraud, but have no alternative explanation. Its like they've stopped trying to maintain a vene of credibility now.
Because the whole system is Freudulent. What would they do if they allowed it? Toss out the entire election? Preidents are just puppets. They are really not that important and do not have the power people believe they have. It's time to move on.
|03 HusTler
Al wrote to Dennisk <=-
Re: Re: Election
By: Dennisk to Dumas Walker on Wed Dec 09 2020 09:07 pm
It seems odd how easily some are willing to dismiss fraud, but have no alternative explanation. Its like they've stopped trying to maintain a veneer of credibility now.
The allegations of fraud were never dismissed. This election has been looked over time and again. There have been hearings and investigations but never any real evidence of a stolen election.
Here in the message areas we can make any kind of claims we want and argue day and night.
In a court if you make allegations you have to have proof and none has been provided.
Isn't the whole point of being an investigative journalist, to look into it?
That is my point, journalists weren't interested in digging into the claims. They were merely dismissed.
I get touchy if they always criticise my country but never
criticise, or even discuss, their own, or seem overly obsessed
with my country's leadership. Otherwise, I feel they are free to
their opinion. :)
if people from other countries criticize the usa it's usually because
of their edia is so sensationalized. they've been that way a lot
longer than our media as been.
Yes, or they've been watching our media. It would be nice if the media would quit trying to compete with the cable news and the internet and just present the news for what it is and not the entertainment value.
Was Walter Cronkite on of the last honest News anchors?
These day's we have cockroaches like Chris Cuomo, Don Lemon, Wolf Blitzer spreading the daily gossip.
Dumas Walker wrote to DENN <=-
Was Walter Cronkite on of the last honest News anchors?
Maybe not *the* last, but certainly a member of the last group.
These day's we have cockroaches like Chris Cuomo, Don Lemon, Wolf Blitzer spreading the daily gossip.
Those are not news men, especially the first two. Pot stirrers
at best.
Was Walter Cronkite on of the last honest News anchors?
Maybe not *the* last, but certainly a member of the last group.
These day's we have cockroaches like Chris Cuomo, Don Lemon, Wolf
Blitzer spreading the daily gossip.
Those are not news men, especially the first two. Pot stirrers at best.
Those are not news men, especially the first two. Pot stirrers at best.
I equate them to the Enquirer and others.
My ex wife used to buy those and she thought they were true stories, lol
| Sysop: | deepend |
|---|---|
| Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
| Users: | 240 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 90:01:54 |
| Calls: | 1,446 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 3,340 |
| Messages: | 358,007 |