• Old News

    From Rob Mccart@618:250/1 to ALL on Fri Oct 31 09:21:16 2025
    Odd news story this week. Probably in the last place anyone would
    expect, a fossilized animal footprint about the size of a human
    hand was found on Prince Edward Island, Canada and thrown the
    Paleontologists into tizzy because it's been dated at 290 million
    years old, about 60 million years older than any life that size was
    thought to exist to date.

    Shows there's always room for surprises and to learn new things.. B)

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * BUFFERS=20 FILES=15 2nd down, 4th quarter, 5 yds to go
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)
  • From August Abolins@618:400/23.10 to Rob Mccart on Sun Nov 2 20:24:00 2025
    Hello Rob Mccart!

    ** On Friday 31.10.25 - 09:21, Rob Mccart wrote to ALL:

    Odd news story this week. Probably in the last place anyone would
    expect, a fossilized animal footprint about the size of a human
    hand was found on Prince Edward Island, Canada and thrown the..

    I'm not convinced that methods to date things like that is
    completely accurate or reliable.



    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.64
    * Origin: (618:400/23.10)
  • From digimaus@618:618/1 to Rob Mccart on Fri Oct 31 17:10:56 2025
    Rob Mccart wrote to ALL <=-

    Shows there's always room for surprises and to learn new things.. B)

    It could also be that we know so much that isn't so. We think we know
    all of the things then something comes along and remind us that we know
    so little.

    -- Sean

    ... You have my two cents' worth. Now can I have my change?
    --- MultiMail/Win
    * Origin: Outpost BBS * Johnson City, TN (618:618/1)
  • From Mortar M.@618:250/19 to digimaus on Tue Nov 4 12:02:19 2025
    Re: Re: Old News
    By: digimaus to Rob Mccart on Fri Oct 31 2025 17:10:56

    It could also be that we know so much that isn't so. We think we know
    all of the things then something comes along and remind us that we know
    so little.

    It's been said over the years that we know more about outer space than we do about the ocean depths. Now that we have vehicals that can reach the ocean bottoms, that may soon change, if it hasen't already.
    --- SBBSecho 3.31-Linux
    * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (618:250/19)
  • From Rob Mccart@618:250/1 to AUGUST ABOLINS on Wed Nov 5 09:50:11 2025
    Odd news story this week. Probably in the last place anyone would
    expect, a fossilized animal footprint about the size of a human
    hand was found on Prince Edward Island, Canada and thrown the..

    I'm not convinced that methods to date things like that is
    >completely accurate or reliable.

    Probably not totally accurate but I'm sure they are using the same
    methods that have been used to 'date' other specimens, or in this
    case it's more like estimating the age of rock in that area, so
    the numbers may be inaccurate but should be comparative..

    It's like the carbon dating, we think of it as being pretty
    accurate but you often find that the older the specimen is,
    the wider the margin of error, like you start getting the age
    of a sample may be plus or minus 5,000 years old when you're
    getting close to the maximum it can do, about 50,000 years old..

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Don't Vote... It only encourages them...
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)
  • From Rob Mccart@618:250/1 to DIGIMAUS on Wed Nov 5 09:50:11 2025
    Shows there's always room for surprises and to learn new things.. B)

    It could also be that we know so much that isn't so. We think we know
    >all of the things then something comes along and remind us that we know
    >so little.

    Yes, over time most of the scientific information we've collected gets overturned or at least updated once we find better ways to look at
    things.

    But that's a bit like people.. You learn as you grow/age - if
    you're paying attention... (I went back to add that last bit..)

    I always liked the Mark Twain quote, he said when he was 14 that
    his father was so ignorant he couldn't bear to be around him, but
    when he was 21 he said he was astounded how much the old man had
    learned in just 7 years.. B)

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Public office... the last refuge of the incompetent
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)
  • From digimaus@618:618/1 to Rob Mccart on Wed Nov 5 16:04:46 2025
    Rob Mccart wrote to DIGIMAUS <=-

    I always liked the Mark Twain quote, he said when he was 14 that
    his father was so ignorant he couldn't bear to be around him, but
    when he was 21 he said he was astounded how much the old man had
    learned in just 7 years.. B)

    "A man is like a plank of wood: needs to be seasoned before it's
    useful."

    -- Sean
    (who is 18 with 35 years of experience)

    ... "My wife and I were happy for twenty years. Then we met." - R. Danerfield --- MultiMail/Win
    * Origin: Outpost BBS * Johnson City, TN (618:618/1)
  • From Jimmy Anderson@618:250/24 to Rob Mccart on Wed Nov 5 22:05:37 2025
    Rob Mccart wrote to AUGUST ABOLINS <=-

    Odd news story this week. Probably in the last place anyone would
    expect, a fossilized animal footprint about the size of a human
    hand was found on Prince Edward Island, Canada and thrown the..

    I'm not convinced that methods to date things like that is
    >completely accurate or reliable.

    Probably not totally accurate but I'm sure they are using the same
    methods that have been used to 'date' other specimens, or in this
    case it's more like estimating the age of rock in that area, so
    the numbers may be inaccurate but should be comparative..

    It's like the carbon dating, we think of it as being pretty
    accurate but you often find that the older the specimen is,
    the wider the margin of error, like you start getting the age
    of a sample may be plus or minus 5,000 years old when you're
    getting close to the maximum it can do, about 50,000 years old..

    And of course carbon dating is not historically accurate. Look
    at the dating of the trees buried during Mount St. Helens.




    ... Black holes are where God divided by zero.
    === MultiMail/Mac v0.52
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (618:250/24)
  • From Rob Mccart@618:250/1 to MORTAR M. on Thu Nov 6 07:46:23 2025
    It could also be that we know so much that isn't so. We think we know
    > > all of the things then something comes along and remind us that we know
    > > so little.

    It's been said over the years that we know more about outer space than we do
    >ut the ocean depths. Now that we have vehicals that can reach the ocean bott
    >, that may soon change, if it hasen't already.

    And whether this will be good or bad remains to be seen.. I've read a
    lot of books where waking something up down there didn't work out well.. B)

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Very funny Scottie! Now beam up my trousers!
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)
  • From Rob Mccart@618:250/1 to JIMMY ANDERSON on Fri Nov 7 10:44:47 2025
    It's like the carbon dating, we think of it as being pretty
    accurate but you often find that the older the specimen is,
    the wider the margin of error, like you start getting the age
    of a sample may be plus or minus 5,000 years old when you're
    getting close to the maximum it can do, about 50,000 years old..

    And of course carbon dating is not historically accurate. Look
    >at the dating of the trees buried during Mount St. Helens.

    My impression is it doesn't matter what the carbon based matter
    is buried in, they check the age by the break down of the
    radioactive isotope of the carbon which occurs at a relatively
    predictable rate over time, although it's harder to nail down
    as accurately when it gets quite old.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * She's goin' ta BLOW Captain, and nothin' kinna STOP it!
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)
  • From Mike Powell@618:250/1 to JIMMY ANDERSON on Fri Nov 7 13:15:34 2025
    It's like the carbon dating, we think of it as being pretty
    accurate but you often find that the older the specimen is,
    the wider the margin of error, like you start getting the age
    of a sample may be plus or minus 5,000 years old when you're
    getting close to the maximum it can do, about 50,000 years old..

    And of course carbon dating is not historically accurate. Look
    >at the dating of the trees buried during Mount St. Helens.

    Did something about the volcanic erruption prevent them from being dated properly? I had never heard that before.

    Mike

    * SLMR 2.1a * One good turn gets all the blankets.
    --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)
  • From Mortar M.@618:250/19 to Rob Mccart on Sat Nov 8 13:20:16 2025
    Re: Re: Old News
    By: Rob Mccart to MORTAR M. on Thu Nov 06 2025 07:46:23

    And whether this will be good or bad remains to be seen.. I've read a
    lot of books where waking something up down there didn't work out well.. B)

    RELEASE THE KRACKEN!!!
    --- SBBSecho 3.31-Linux
    * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (618:250/19)