But, don't you lose any credits that you have amassed in the
meantime if you cancel later?
With Libro.fm, you can PAUSE your membership, (no recurring
monthly credit fee), and resume when you are ready to buy. Or..
you can continue to pay the monthly, and buy the books you want
with those credits all at once at any time.
I have all my Audible books downloaded on my Kindle and also
my iPad for good measure.
That is very smart. But anything can happen during a Kindle/app
update. They could "update" your collection anyway they see fit
- even deleting controversial titles that you already have.
I don't know if they can be ripped and placed onto CDs,
etc... I have never tried the Audible app on a PC.
Probably not.. since the files are DRM-ed.
But Libro.fm versions are DRM-free and yours to keep and play as
you see fit, with any player you want. I play my files that
I've copied to USB or SSD and plug them into my TV so that I can
crawl into bed and listen from there.
You can suspend your subscription to Audible also, I have
done so in the past. The issue there is that you can only do
it in 3 month intervals and once you've frozen your account
for 3 months, you cannot do it again for another 6 months.
I think it's unecessary and anti-consumer -- I don't
understand why they refuse to let the customer keep their
accumulated credits for later use.
The one good thing is that you can pre-order audio books so
if you do leave and you're waiting on a book, it's still
possible ot get what you want. I guess Amazon are very
insistent that you remain a paying member each and every
month.
Whoa.. I did not know about the 3-month/6-month pattern with
Audible. I'm trying to educate people who *might* be interested
in an audio alternative (when driving, or when wanting to sit in
a dimmed/darkened room to relax) and enjoy a good telling of a
story. Ultimately, I would think it would be better to "own"
your purchases and be able to play them anywhere and any way you
want - and even maybe share them with other people; Libro.fm
allows that.
I think it's unecessary and anti-consumer -- I don't
understand why they refuse to let the customer keep their
accumulated credits for later use.
Time is money. Audible wants you to use up your credit asap to
increase the likelyhood that you will buy your next product
sooner. But unused credits are eliminated after 1 yr: "Unused
credits carry over to the next month for up to 1 year. "
ref: https://lovelyaudiobooks.info/kindle-unlimited-vs-audible/
The one good thing is that you can pre-order audio books so
if you do leave and you're waiting on a book, it's still
possible ot get what you want. I guess Amazon are very
insistent that you remain a paying member each and every
month.
A-n wants to make you feel dependant on them.
So.. why not subscribe to the Libro.fm model, have the ability
to play on any device, or use any player, keep your files, pause
the membership, retain your credits, and support your local
community?
--
I know what Audible use a DRM format which is meant to only
run on their Apps but it's not too big a problem for most
people because the App is available on all major platforms
-- iOS, MacOS, PC and Android.
I can just Bluetooth audiobooks to my car stereo whenever I
am driving which is what I would normally do with music
anyway.
I would argue that you DO get to own your books because even
if you unsubscribe you still get to keep them. I don't
believe there would be any justificaion for Amazon to
retrospectively patch the App to disallow people from plaing
their previously owned audiobooks even if Audible one day
goes under.
Audible also do a $7.95 Plus plan which offers an "all-you-
can-listen" service giving you access to thousands of pre-
selected audiobooks.
..for $14.95 per month, the price of a Libro.fm
subscription, you can have access to both Audible Plus AND
gain a credit which can be used to purchase and keep any
book. There is no doubt that Audible a more cost effective
service than Libro.fm
-- there are pros and cons with both so even though Audib
dominates the distribution of audiobooks by orders of
magnitude, users should consider options and pick whichever
suits their requirements.
I would argue that you DO get to own your books because even if you unsubscribe you
still get to keep them. I don't believe there would be any justificaion for Amazon
retrospectively patch the App to disallow people from plaing their previously owned
audiobooks even if Audible one day goes under.
Hello Zouf!
** On Thursday 06.05.21 - 11:41, Zouf wrote to Ogg:
I know what Audible use a DRM format which is meant to only
run on their Apps but it's not too big a problem for most
people because the App is available on all major platforms
-- iOS, MacOS, PC and Android.
True.. as long as the app works and never "breaks" when you need
to upgrade it, fine. But the libro.fm files are not tied to any
app. You can play them any way you like.
I can just Bluetooth audiobooks to my car stereo whenever I
am driving which is what I would normally do with music
anyway.
That is handy for sure. The Audible/Kindle built-in features for
that are well planned out. Libro.fm files can be caste the same
way as long as your favourite device supports it.
I would argue that you DO get to own your books because even
if you unsubscribe you still get to keep them. I don't
believe there would be any justificaion for Amazon to
retrospectively patch the App to disallow people from plaing
their previously owned audiobooks even if Audible one day
goes under.
But it has happened before. Perhaps if people had some of the
controversial Dr.Seuss ebooks, they would have been pulled from
the devices. Those books are nolonger available to buy. The
problem probably doesn't apply to the audio versions because it
was the images that triggered the discontinuance. Other ebooks
have been replaced with censored/redacted/woke versions.
Audible also do a $7.95 Plus plan which offers an "all-you-
can-listen" service giving you access to thousands of pre-
selected audiobooks.
I just remembered that one too. That's a smart one for people
who don't particularly care to keep something once it has been
experienced, but the selection from that catalog is quite large
just the same.
..for $14.95 per month, the price of a Libro.fm
subscription, you can have access to both Audible Plus AND
gain a credit which can be used to purchase and keep any
book. There is no doubt that Audible a more cost effective
service than Libro.fm
One final option that libro.fm has that the others do not. Being
drm-free, people can share an audiobook much like you can a real
book. One family or group doesn't need multiple accounts just to
be able to listen to the same book. That gives "cost effective"
a different meaning. ;)
-- there are pros and cons with both so even though Audib
dominates the distribution of audiobooks by orders of
magnitude, users should consider options and pick whichever
suits their requirements.
It's nice to have options out in the market. One service for
all isn't a good ending.
So.. why not subscribe to the Libro.fm model, have the ability
to play on any device, or use any player, keep your files, pause
the membership, retain your credits, and support your local
community?
Re: Audible v Libro.fm
By: Ogg to Zouf on Wed May 05 2021 09:21:00
So.. why not subscribe to the Libro.fm model,
. .. and support your local community?
Should I subscribe to my grocery store to buy food? Should I subscribe to the gas station to fuel up or to a book store to buy a book?
What ever happened to just buying stuff, then owning it. And that's the end of it.
I don't want to have to sit down and do math to calculate whether or not it's in my best interest to enter into a long-term contract with a merchant just to have the privilage of buying from them. You have a product? just sell it and be done with it.
That's a good point you made about being able to share your non-DRM audiobooks with friends and family.
but smaller companies like Libro.fm need to be supported
long term because they don't have a trillion dollar company
behind them. I can even forsee something like an Amazon
takeover occurring if they hit a rough patch and their
shareprice drop W
Hextor wrote to Ogg <=-
Should I subscribe to my grocery store to buy food? Should I subscribe
to the gas station to fuel up or to a book store to buy a book?
What ever happened to just buying stuff, then owning it. And that's the end of it.
I don't want to have to sit down and do math to calculate whether or
not it's in my best interest to enter into a long-term contract with a merchant just to have the privilage of buying from them. You have a product? just sell it and be done with it.
Re: Audible v Libro.fm
By: Zouf to Ogg on Thu May 06 2021 11:41 am
I would argue that you DO get to own your books because even if you unsub still get to keep them. I don't believe there would be any justificaion f retrospectively patch the App to disallow people from plaing their previo audiobooks even if Audible one day goes under.
YOu only own the books as long as the provider has no licensing issues with platform is not EOLed, of the provider decides to EOL their application from platform.
These days people does not care for these things, but I have books in my hom date from the 19th century and I am sure many digital goods covered by DRM w survive in a family even half they did.
--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
Should I subscribe to my grocery store to buy food? Should
I subscribe to the gas station to fuel up or..
Re: Audible v Libro.fm
By: Ogg to Zouf on Wed May 05 2021 09:21:00
So.. why not subscribe to the Libro.fm model, have the ability
to play on any device, or use any player, keep your files, pause
the membership, retain your credits, and support your local
community?
Should I subscribe to my grocery store to buy food? Should I subscribe to t gas station to fuel up or to a book store to buy a book?
What ever happened to just buying stuff, then owning it. And that's the end it.
I don't want to have to sit down and do math to calculate whether or not it' in my best interest to enter into a long-term contract with a merchant just have the privilage of buying from them. You have a product? just sell it an be done with it.
I don't see how a platform holder could nuke an app on an operating system s as iOS. As long as it can operate independently from being online there is n reason you won't be able to use it even if it's EOL'd on the AppStore. It ju means that the app is no longer available for download along with all the bo that you own.
These days people does not care for these things, but I have
books in my hom date from the 19th century and I am sure
many digital goods covered by DRM w survive in a family even
half they did.
I don't see how a platform holder could nuke an app on an
operating system such as iOS. As long as it can operate
independently from being online there is no reason you won't
be able to use it even if it's EOL'd on the AppStore. It
just means that the app is no longer available for download
along with all the books that you own.
At lot of people are not going to be bothered preserving the
digital property that they own so a lot of games and books,
etc... are going to become near impossible to get ahold of
in say 50-100 years time.
I have a delightful collecion of old books also... my oldest
one is from 1814. :-)
but smaller companies like Libro.fm need to be supported
long term because they don't have a trillion dollar company
behind them. I can even forsee something like an Amazon
takeover occurring if they hit a rough patch and their
shareprice drop W
Are they public?
Libro.fm is very enthusiastic. I hope they don't give up. They
have a respectable business ethic. They really want to support
indies with the audio product. They KNOW that indies, such as my
biz, are a valuable marketing resource; I can recommend a
particular title - suggest an audio option - and the customer is
likely to check it out to get the drm-free version *and* support
an indie.
The life expectancy of a mobile device is 3 years. 4 for a
laptop. If you are a microhiphead you can extract much more
time out of those, but most people don't.
Ogg wrote to Zouf <=-
Audible. I'm trying to educate people who *might* be interested
in an audio alternative (when driving, or when wanting to sit in
a dimmed/darkened room to relax) and enjoy a good telling of a
story. Ultimately, I would think it would be better to "own"
your purchases and be able to play them anywhere and any way you
want - and even maybe share them with other people; Libro.fm
allows that.
Hextor wrote to Ogg <=-
Should I subscribe to my grocery store to buy food? Should I subscribe
to the gas station to fuel up or to a book store to buy a book?
What ever happened to just buying stuff, then owning it. And that's the end of it.
Ogg wrote to Hextor <=-
Should I subscribe to my grocery store to buy food? Should
I subscribe to the gas station to fuel up or..
People are already doing that with their affinity/points cards.
Arelor wrote to Zouf <=-
That content can be nuked from the device is a fact with many
platforms. Amazon has nuked books and Steam has nuked videogame soundtracks.
Amazon deleted user-licensed copies of "1984" and "Animal
Farm" from their customer's Kindles. Relevant to point out
that you don't purchase digital items from Amazon, you
purchase a license to use, subject to terms and
conditions.
That content can be nuked from the device is a fact with many platforms. Ama has nuked books and Steam has nuked videogame soundtracks. If you purchased game with a certain soundtrack at a given date you may find that a Steam pus update voids it one day. Sure, there are ways to fight against this, but at this point you are fighting against the platform, which is a counterproducti thing to do.
As for he survivability of the content after the platform itself is nuked fr the store, I suppose that depends on the platform. Afaik these thigns are designed so products you purchased are only available in devices on which yo have installed the client software and on which the client software is linke to your account. If the client software is EOLed from the store, maybe, _maybe_, depending on the aplication, you can keep using the stuff you purchased on your devices.
Until the devices get toasted, because there is no mechanism to migrate the content over to new devices when linked to EOLed applications.
The life expectancy of a mobile device is 3 years. 4 for a laptop. If you ar microhiphead you can extract much more time out of those, but most people don't.
Kobo does it in a sneaky way.
If someone uses the pc/desktop app to shop and DL books, that app will always check for app updates first. If it detects an update, the user is *forced* to acknowledge and grab the update - otherwise you can't use the app properly.
I just triggered my Kobo DT app. Friggin' thing consumed 13MB of my precious mobile data too. :/
After the update check, the app performs a sync. That's where the supplier can optionally adjust your collection. They can pull a controversial book
or replace it with a woke copy.
One *can* try to operate the Kobo DT app offline, but the autocheck announcement will always cover part of the screen.
At lot of people are not going to be bothered preserving the
digital property that they own so a lot of games and books,
etc... are going to become near impossible to get ahold of
in say 50-100 years time.
It's probably the same mindset for tangible things. We like to keep and
hold on to stuff (for the memories they trigger) yet rarely reuse them.
lot of digital content will disappear due to hardware failures. I think you' a little bit off though regarding the lifespan of computers, laptops and mov devices -- I have a laptop that's 16 yars old and was used extensively for 1 of those years and it's still in perfect working condition... I haven't replaced the HDD or anything. I think high quality tablets, due to their sol state, should last well over 10-15 years of use. Computers and mobile device can pretty much be stored indefinitely also which is why we still see workin machines from the 70s and 80s. HDDs are the weak point as they only tend to last 25-30 years before they require serious maintenence or are completely unfixable. This is why a lot of retro machines from the late 80s and early 9 are now booting from SSDs rather than their original HDDs.
consume and move onto the next product. This is why DVD/Blu-Ray sales are completely tanking... no one wants to pay $15 for a DVD when they could have months of all-you-can eat access to movies via a Netflix subscription.
Should I subscribe to my grocery store to buy food? Should I
subscribe to t gas station to fuel up or to a book store to buy a
book? What ever happened to just buying stuff, then owning it. And
that's the end it.
Amazon deleted user-licensed copies of "1984" and "Animal Farm" from their customer's Kindles. Relevant to point out that you don't purchase digital items from Amazon, you purchase a license to use, subject to terms and conditions.
You can't make this kind of news up.
"The retailer will still wipe an e-book if a court or
regulatory body orders it, [..]
Therefore it is in the best interests for the seller's app to
have the ability to call the mother ship and purge your device
as desired.
It's probably the same mindset for tangible things. We like
to keep and hold on to stuff (for the memories they
trigger) yet rarely reuse them.
..I reckon you could easily get close to 2 books from
Audible for the price of 1 book from Libro.fm. Now you
might never truly OWN that audiobook, but most people won't
take that aspect into consideration.
People just want to consume and move onto the next product.
This is why DVD/Blu-Ray sales are completely tanking... no
one wants to pay $15 for a DVD when they could have 2
months of all-you-can eat access to movies via a Netflix
subscription.
Ownership is now overrated. The problem is that thrift
stores and swap meets are going to be full of bugger all in
the near future as everything is considered disposable and
things that were previously tangible are now intangible.
I still think it is ironic that the titles removed were
"1984" and "Animal Farm." :O
Zouf wrote to Ogg <=-
There is always the ever present danger that non-DRM free platforms can alter or remove products via client updates. It's a cost/benefit in the end in relation to the end user.
Now you might never truly OWN that audiobook, but most people
won't take that aspect into consideration. People just want to consume
and move onto the next product.
Arelor wrote to Zouf <=-
consume and move onto the next product. This is why DVD/Blu-Ray sales are completely tanking... no one wants to pay $15 for a DVD when they could have months of all-you-can eat access to movies via a Netflix subscription.
This is what is going to obliterate the movie industry.
Dr. What wrote to Zouf <=-
That's not entirely true. I agree that most people just want to pay a
few dollars to watch a movie once (and for most Hollywood stuff, that's all it's worth). But what happens when the movie you want to watch is
no longer on NetFlix because of a spat between companies? Or worse,
that the Cancel Culture wants to cancel your favorite movie? (Ever see Disney's Song of the South? You won't here in the U.S.)
Moving to get-it-on-demand puts companies in control of whether or not they allow you see that content. And companies have a bad track record
of censorship, especially today.
Re: Audible v Libro.fm
By: Arelor to Hextor on Sun May 09 2021 07:11 am
Should I subscribe to my grocery store to buy food? Should I
subscribe to t gas station to fuel up or to a book store to buy a
book? What ever happened to just buying stuff, then owning it. And
that's the end it.
I hate this subscription crap going on in the online stores. "Prime on Amazon" is $120 per month or
when they have a "discount". You get free shipping but there's no way I buy enough products that need
$120 dollars for delivery.Ebay has better deals and most sellers offer free shipping. The only thing i
there's little accountability at Ebay. Amazon has much better customer service then Ebay. Ebay is just
hub for thousands of sellers from all over the world. Amazon will refund your money in a Jiffy. Ebay
supports the sellers. Not the buyers. Subscription? I don't think so. I don't see what I can gain payi
subscription fees.
... Advertising is legalized lying.
Arelor wrote to HusTler <=-Amaz
I hate this subscription crap going on in the online stores. "Prime on
on" is $120 per month or
Wow, Prime is expensive over there! I think it is 36 eur per year in Spain. It is actually cost effective and you only have to offer your
soul to Amazon in the bargain :-P
I hate this subscription crap going on in the online stores. "Prime on Amazon" is $120 per month or $99 when they have a "discount". You get free shipping but there's no way I buy enough products that need $120 dollars for delivery.Ebay has better deals and most sellers offer free shipping. The only thing is there's little accountability at Ebay. Amazon has much better customer service then Ebay. Ebay is just a hub for thousands of sellers from all over the world. Amazon will refund your money in a Jiffy. Ebay supports the sellers. Not the buyers. Subscription? I don't think so. I don't see
Wow, Prime is expensive over there! I think it is 36 eur per year in Spain. It is actually cost effective and you only have to offer your soul to Amazon in the bargain :-P
That said, is is easy to get free deliveries or discounts in Spain from most e-commerces anyway, which makes Amazon's offer less desirable. In
Amazon deleted user-licensed copies of "1984" and "Animal Farm" from their customer's Kindles. Relevant to point out that you don't purchase digital items from Amazon, you purchase a license to use, subject to terms and conditions.
You can't make this kind of news up.
I wonder what made them choose those two titles to delete?
* SLMR 2.1a * The Word of the Day is "Legs." Spread the word.
I still think it is ironic that the titles removed were "1984" and "Animal Farm." :O
I hate this subscription crap going on in the online stores. "Prime on Amazon" is $120 per month or $99 when they have a "discount".
Elf wrote to Dr. What <=-
Yeah, thanks to the "cancel culture" of the day, I have been collecting all my favorite media from the past - in Non-DRM contaminated form, of course - before it gets "canceled."
We obviously are not teaching history in our schools/homes today
that as you move back in time, you find not just different people, but different cultures among people in different regions of the country.
Sure, what is not acceptable today was yesterday so everything needs to
be reviewed and understood *in the context* of the time period it took place. Don't look down upon or judge harshly those from the past, but learn from them and be thankful for how far we have come. I think that
is what should be taught today instead of, "Oh my! How offensive, erase the past! Erase the past!"
Arelor wrote to Zouf <=-
I wonder if the creative bankrupcy we are in, with heavy reuse and
abuse of franchises, remakes and sequels, is a symthom of this, or just
a parallell phenomenom.
I hate this subscription crap going on in the online stores. "Prime o Amazon" is $120 per month or $99 when they have a "discount".
Pretty sure that's an annual fee, not monthly.
I hate this subscription crap going on in the online stores. "Prime on
Wow, Prime is expensive over there! I think it is 36 eur per year inAmazon Prime is actually $120/year (not month).
Arelor wrote to Zouf <=-
I wonder if the creative bankrupcy we are in, with heavy reuse and abuse of franchises, remakes and sequels, is a symthom of this, or just a parallell phenomenom.
I always heard it was marketing AI. Get this star and this director in this franchise/reboot, pay X
dollars, and you'll be guaranteed to make X times 3
in revenues. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Compare with a critically acclaimed but untested director, an unknown star, and a new story - the ris
is much higher.
... Observe the procedures of a general alert.
amazon prime is 119/ a YEAR, not month
if you order more than 2 things a month, it pays for itself.
Re: Re: Audible v Libro.fm
By: Elf to Arelor on Tue May 11 2021 10:14 am
I hate this subscription crap going on in the online stores. "Prime on
Wow, Prime is expensive over there! I think it is 36 eur per year inAmazon Prime is actually $120/year (not month).
Oooops. Typo?? ;-) Prime is $120 per year too much. lol
Nah. I can buy for much less on Ebay. I just need to be more selective who I buy from. With ebay I have to open a case and wait for a decision. Amazon is no questions asked. The seller provides a tracking number and that means I got it? Bull dinky! If I say I didn't get it, I didn't get it. Now I buy from sellers that provide pictures of the delivery. Now that's smart. In my area there is so much theft going on (mostly from UPS) I need to see where my stuff is delivered.
When I was in high school, we read Orwell's 1984. I
highly doubt that any student would be allowed to read
that today. Even the indoctrinated would realize that
it's being used as a manual for the Lefties today.
Ogg wrote to Dr. What <=-
When I was in high school, we read Orwell's 1984. I
highly doubt that any student would be allowed to read
that today. Even the indoctrinated would realize that
it's being used as a manual for the Lefties today.
I sold a healthy amount last year at my shop, and primarily to
young people.
MRO wrote to HusTler <=-
Nah. I can buy for much less on Ebay. I just need to be more selective who I buy from. With ebay I have to open a case and wait for a decision. Amazon is no questions asked. The seller provides a tracking number and that means I got it? Bull dinky! If I say I didn't get it, I didn't get it. Now I buy from sellers that provide pictures of the delivery. Now that's smart. In my area there is so much theft going on (mostly from UPS) I need to see where my stuff is delivered.
your tracking number shows where it went and when it was delivered.
maybe you should buy a camera for where you have dropoffs or rent a
cheap PO box and get deliveries there. ---
maybe you should buy a camera for where you have dropoffs or rent a cheap PO box and get deliveries there. ---
Does UPS deliver to PO boxes now?
Arelor wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
I could have 90 Anthony Hopkins films if they were original films, but
I can't have 90 remakes of a Hopkins film even if they switch to a different famous actor each time.
fusion wrote to Digital Man <=-
their movie selection is a bit different though. a bit like if netflix
has Jackie Chan, Amazon gets Jean-Claude Van Damme.
Arelor wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
I could have 90 Anthony Hopkins films if they were original films, but I can't have 90 remakes of a Hopkins film even if they switch to a different famous actor each time.
Oh, god.
Vin Diesel in "Silence of the Lambs".
Channing Tatum in "The Bounty".
... From nothing to more than nothing
MRO wrote to Elf <=-
there's atleast one in each city.
i didnt mean us postal box.
i dont even know why someone would use those.
Yeah, I don't know why we still use the US Postal Service at all. It's terrible. We even contacted Amazon recently and asked if there was
anyway they could flag our account to NEVER deliver through the US
Postal Service because the packages are ALWAYS delayed or sometimes delivered to the wrong address. They said, "No." :-(
ELF wrote to HEXTOR <=-
AMEN!!!! Tired of everyone trying to get me to become part of THEIR recurring revenue stream.
JIMMY ANDERSON wrote to ELF <=-
AMEN!!!! Tired of everyone trying to get me to become part of THEIR recurring revenue stream.
So I guess you don't want to join my Patreon? :-)
I have working computers that are much older than 16 years. I know this sort equipment can be made to last and be kept in operational condition for long.
The issue with computer survivability is that not everybody is a BBS person can keep using the same computer for all eternity.
My numbers seem harsh until you realize the people here are not the average consumers. The average consumer loses a smartphone to obsolescence or market hype earlier than the phone falls appart. This is specially true because man phones will develop data storage issues - run out of necessary room to store the operating system and crucial programs - after just a few years of use.
It is the same with laptops, specially low cost ones. A laptop you are actua using will have its bettery fried in 2-4 years in the hands of somebody who does not follow good practices. The _really_, _really_ low cost ones will develop data storage issues just as the smartphones do, at which point avera users just discard them and get a new one. The non-low-cost ones will last longer, but eventually will lack RAM or GHzs enough to power the new shiny g of the year and will be put in the dumpster soon after.
Keep in mind that, for an average consumer, a device that cannot perform a t deemed usual at a given time (such as running Windows 800 in 2050) is not fi for service and, consequently, as good as broken. Off to the dumpster it goe
My numbers come from a talk with a guy doing hardware provisioning at a data center. He actually expected mobile devices to last 2 (!) years before falli to obsolescence and laptops to last 4 before falling to a combination of obsolescence and fixable hardware failures. If they last more, that is great but when you buy a phone for 500 USD, he said you should be thinking you wer paying 250USD +ISP fees per year in phone use.
For the record, this guy rotates server hardware for HPC applications once every 4 or 5 years.
This is what is going to obliterate the movie industry.
The movie is no longer worth 15 bucks from the producer's point of view. It worth a tiny fraction of the subscription fee the consumer is paying. There heavy devaulation at work here.
The producer is going to be forced to produce more films in order to keep up , each worth less than the film after, and therefore we are going to see a b shift in the quantity vs quality spectrum in film making. Since each film is not worth peanuts, the producer is not going to spend peanuts in it either, with some counted exceptions.
I wonder if the creative bankrupcy we are in, with heavy reuse and abuse of franchises, remakes and sequels, is a symthom of this, or just a parallell phenomenom.
When I was younger, there were also films in the making that I was eager to released. When films where released, they stood in theatres for quite a long time. Not, theatres rotate movies so fast that if you blink you will miss them,but it does not matter to me, because it was probably a movie I didn't want to watch :-(
Hello Zouf!
** On Monday 10.05.21 - 11:55, Zouf wrote to Ogg:
It's probably the same mindset for tangible things. We like
to keep and hold on to stuff (for the memories they
trigger) yet rarely reuse them.
..I reckon you could easily get close to 2 books from
Audible for the price of 1 book from Libro.fm. Now you
might never truly OWN that audiobook, but most people won't
take that aspect into consideration.
Ah.. but with the Libro.fm option, you can have a copy ready to
play at home on the hi-fi and one in the car cd-player ready
when you hop into the car to drive, and on a portable device -
and extra copies for "family". ;)
People just want to consume and move onto the next product.
This is why DVD/Blu-Ray sales are completely tanking... no
one wants to pay $15 for a DVD when they could have 2
months of all-you-can eat access to movies via a Netflix
subscription.
Ahh.. but the internet connection is not free for a service
suitable for streaming movies. For the audio downloads, 300MB
to 400MB per book max, any free wi-fi hotspot will do.
For Netflix, you have to add the fibe/cable/Starlink price per
month. ;) Over the course of a year, that's still pretty
expensive for a couple of movies per week. I can probably buy
a mix of the same new and used DVDs for much less in the same
time period.
Ownership is now overrated. The problem is that thrift
stores and swap meets are going to be full of bugger all in
the near future as everything is considered disposable and
things that were previously tangible are now intangible.
But that indeed seems to be the trend. Many people are in the
mode to purge stuff faster as they approach retirement years.
Young people are fine with a-la-carte viewing and never keeping
copies taking it for granted that they could always get it
again from then 'net at any time.
Correct. But in many instances the companies offering DRM contaminated eBoo are committing fraud.
They offer an eBook for "sale" and charge a paper book price for such a sale But they aren't selling an eBook. They are selling you a limited use licens to read the eBook for certain time frame (which may be limited by the licens or by the life of the company).
When a library wants to let me borrow an eBook that expires. That makes sen
They aren't offering a sale. They are offering a borrow and everyone has t expectation that the eBook will stop being readable by a certain time.
I've told authors/publishers that my rule is: If your content is contaminate with DRM, it's worth $1 - and that's only so I can watch/read it now instead borrowing it from the local library for free.
Now you might never truly OWN that audiobook, but most people
won't take that aspect into consideration. People just want to consume and move onto the next product.
That's not entirely true. I agree that most people just want to pay a few dollars to watch a movie once (and for most Hollywood stuff, that's all it's worth). But what happens when the movie you want to watch is no longer on NetFlix because of a spat between companies? Or worse, that the Cancel Cult wants to cancel your favorite movie? (Ever see Disney's Song of the South? won't here in the U.S.)
Moving to get-it-on-demand puts companies in control of whether or not they allow you see that content. And companies have a bad track record of censorship, especially today.
2. I wouldn't really count the cost of the internet service in regards to the cost of steaming
conent. I don't think I've known people prior to Netflix to NOT have an internet connection. It'
necessity nowaways. You have an internet connection and also the ability to steam video via a
subscription service. You DO get a lot more for your money than previous times, but I have seen
many people sign up to all the subscription services -- Netflix, Disney and Prime along with
specialist services such as Crunchyroll, etc... the cost builds up.
Zouf wrote to Dr. What <=-
I think this kind of mindset is going to bite a lot of people in the
ass.
Netflix continually rotate movies and TV shows as licence agreements expire and either get renewed or not. There are many films I've watched
on Netflix that are no longer available to me.
JIMMY ANDERSON wrote to ELF <=-
AMEN!!!! Tired of everyone trying to get me to become part of THEIR recurring revenue stream.
So I guess you don't want to join my Patreon? :-)
Dr. What wrote to Zouf <=-
It already has. Many people got burned when they bought into DRM
schemes only to have the DRM servers shutdown when the company decided
to not support it anymore. And it's not the little guys. Amazon and Microsoft have taken money and left people with nothing.
On 05-17-21 08:35, Elf wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
Well, honestly, now that you mention Patreon, that is different. While
I have not joined anyone's Patreon at this point, I must admit I have never discounted the idea. I think because joining someone's Patreon
would be more personal to me, more like supporting one of my peers who
are doing something I really appreciate and want to see continue. It
feels different than a corporation - *not* that I am a corporation
hater. I do pay for some services monthly like Spotify, Disney+ (annually), Amazon Prime (annually), and Hulu. I just don't want to add
to that list - I don't want EVERYTHING to become a monthly payment that
I feel obligated to pay. :-)
... The answer is easier when the question is hypothetical.
I think that is only half truth.
I quote a friend of mine: "The reason Spanish ISPs are not complaining again that they know they would not sell decent Internet subscriptions if they did
Maybe most people would have Internet access if they didn't stream or torren cheaper Internet subscriptions. There are only three reasons to purchase mas
* Streaming and downloading torrents and Usenet warez like crazy.
* Playing games (and then, it is more of an issue with latency than bandwidt * Running Internet facing services that are bandwidth intensive.
The Internet plan I am using to post this message costs me less than 15 buck wanted to stream movies from here I would have to upgrade from this cheapo p the current offer but I think it would put me in the 60 bucks league. With t fair to say streaming would cause me a 60 - 15 = 45 eur/month in data overco
Zouf wrote to Dr. What <=-
I think this kind of mindset is going to bite a lot of people in the ass.
It already has. Many people got burned when they bought into DRM schemes on to have the DRM servers shutdown when the company decided to not support it anymore. And it's not the little guys. Amazon and Microsoft have taken mon and left people with nothing.
Netflix continually rotate movies and TV shows as licence agreements expire and either get renewed or not. There are many films I've watched on Netflix that are no longer available to me.
At least in the case of Netflix, you understand that you are only renting content. They make that pretty clear. Unlike Amazon who says that you are "buying" that DRM-contamined eBook.
... A jerk present in a group indicates a jerk in charge.
Zouf wrote to Dr. What <=-
The ALL digital future is near.
POINDEXTER FORTRAN wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
AMEN!!!! Tired of everyone trying to get me to become part of THEIR recurring revenue stream.
So I guess you don't want to join my Patreon? :-)
You could start your own patreon and have everyone's recurring revenue stream be a part of your recurring revenue stream. How delightfully Meta...
Zouf wrote to Dr. What <=-
The ALL digital future is near.
But it doesn't have to be on the Corporate terms.
If I want to read an eBook, or play a game, and I don't care about being abl to redo that year year, and the price is right for that effective-one-time u then DRMed content is fine.
Personally, I think it all comes down to value. If the paper book (yes, the still make those) is $20, but the DRM-contamined eBook version is the same, then that's a poor value and people will shy away.
As more people get burned by not being able to access their DRMed content (without any compensation), they will turn away from these sources. The mar will always have an alternative.
And remember: It only takes 1 person to break the lock to let everyone have content for free. And if customers feel cheated by DRMed content, they won' have any compulsion against taking it for free.
... "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar" - Freud
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 266 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 10:01:40 |
Calls: | 2,093 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 4,449 |
D/L today: |
29 files (1,470K bytes) |
Messages: | 413,174 |